French government ‘enabled foreseeable’ Rwandan genocide, report claims
Investigation finds that Paris ‘did nothing to stop’ slaughter of 800,000 people in 1994 mass killings
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a43da/a43da3c1f90629635d6d84f7d7589279c384ddba" alt="Paul Kagame and Emmanuel Macron in 2018"
France bears “significant responsibility” for the genocide of hundreds of thousands of Tutsis in Rwanda, according to a newly published landmark report.
Commissioned by the Rwandan government, the report offers a “damning perspective on the events” that led to the murders of around 800,000 people over 100 days between April and July 1994, says The New York Times (NYT).
The government in Paris was a “collaborator” of the extremist Hutu-majority government that orchestrated the killings and remained “unwavering in its support” even though officials knew the mass slaughter was being planned, claim the report authors, from Washington-based law firm Levy Firestone Muse.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26e60/26e60cb924a49f61d1c912d9db390eb10f6d3fa2" alt="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg"
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
France “did nothing to stop” the outbreak of violence against the Tutsi minority, they write, adding: “It is our conclusion that the French government bears significant responsibility for enabling a foreseeable genocide.”
The release of the 600-page report comes weeks after a separate inquiry commissioned by Emmanuel Macron reported that France bears “heavy and damning responsibilities” but was not complicit in the slaughter.
‘Neither blind nor unconscious’
The genocide followed the downing of an airplane carrying the then president of Rwanda, Juvenal Habyarimana, and neighbouring Burundi’s president Cyprien Ntaryamira on 6 April 1994.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Both men were killed in the crash, which was originally thought to have been ordered by Hutu extremists. However, reports would later emerge suggesting that the attack may have been ordered by Rwanda’s current president, Paul Kagame, head of the Tutsi-led Rwandan Patriotic Force.
Almost three decades on from the massacre, “both France and Rwanda are making attempts to set the record straight on what happened during the bloodletting”, the NYT says.
The Rwandan government-commissioned report accuses France of having been “neither blind nor unconscious” to the genocide. French officials are alleged to have “armed, advised, trained, equipped, and protected” the then government, in spite of “the Habyarimana regime’s commitment to the dehumanisation and, ultimately, the destruction and death of Tutsi in Rwanda”.
The report also claims that France later withheld “critical documents and testimony” that could have shed more light on the killing, but found “no evidence that French officials or personnel participated directly in the killing of Tutsi during that period”.
The investigation by the US law firm began in 2017 and “drew on millions of pages of documents and interviews with more than 250 witnesses”, France 24 reports.
Welcoming the findings, President Kagame, a former Tutsi rebel, said that the new report was “an important step toward a common understanding of what took place”. However, a “decades-long effort by certain French officials to cover up their responsibilities” had caused “significant damage”, he warned.
Uneasy allies
In June 1994, as the Tutsi death roll mounted, the UN launched Operation Turquoise, a military-humanitarian intervention. But some critics have claimed that the operation “was in reality aimed at supporting the genocidal Hutu government”, The Guardian reports.
Rwanda and France have “for years tussled over accounts of how the genocide transpired and the extent of French complicity”, says the NYT.
In 2006, the two countries broke diplomatic ties after a Paris judge accused Kagame and nine of his then-aides of ordering the attack on Habyarimana’s plane that triggered the violence - a claim that Rwanda has always denied.
However, “relations have gradually started to thaw” in recent years, adds the newspaper,
Kagame has visited France at least three times since 2018, and Macron is reportedly planning to visit Rwanda later this year, becoming the first French president to do so since Nicolas Sarkozy in 2010.
In an interview with Le Monde on Monday, Rwandan Minister of Foreign Affairs Vincent Biruta said that the newly published report would “contribute to the reconciliation between France and Rwanda”, adding: “If apologies were to be formulated one day, it would be a step in the right direction to restore trust.”
Rwanda also hailed the release of the Macron-commissioned report in March as “an important step toward a common understanding of France’s role in the genocide”, despite the differing conclusion about the balance of blame.
Joe Evans is the world news editor at TheWeek.co.uk. He joined the team in 2019 and held roles including deputy news editor and acting news editor before moving into his current position in early 2021. He is a regular panellist on The Week Unwrapped podcast, discussing politics and foreign affairs.
Before joining The Week, he worked as a freelance journalist covering the UK and Ireland for German newspapers and magazines. A series of features on Brexit and the Irish border got him nominated for the Hostwriter Prize in 2019. Prior to settling down in London, he lived and worked in Cambodia, where he ran communications for a non-governmental organisation and worked as a journalist covering Southeast Asia. He has a master’s degree in journalism from City, University of London, and before that studied English Literature at the University of Manchester.
-
Who is actually running DOGE?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION The White House said in a court filing that Elon Musk isn't the official head of Donald Trump's Department of Government Efficiency task force, raising questions about just who is overseeing DOGE's federal blitzkrieg
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
How does the Kennedy Center work?
The Explainer The D.C. institution has become a cultural touchstone. Why did Trump take over?
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
What are reciprocal tariffs?
The Explainer And will they fix America's trade deficit?
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
The catastrophic conflict looming in the heart of Africa
In the Spotlight Showdown between DR Congo and Rwanda has been a long time coming
By The Week UK Published
-
Blood minerals in DR Congo
Under the Radar Battle for control of DRC fuelled by increasing demand for minerals such as coltan and cobalt, crucial in smartphones and laptops
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The M23 rebels fuelling conflict in DR Congo
The Explainer Ethnic tensions and allure of valuable mineral resources have sparked a resurgence of longstanding conflict
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Who is the Hat Man? 'Shadow people' and sleep paralysis
In Depth 'Sleep demons' have plagued our dreams throughout the centuries, but the explanation could be medical
By The Week Staff Published
-
US accuses Sudan rebels of genocide, sanctions chief
Speed Read Sudan has been engaged in a bloody civil war that erupted in 2023
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Why Assad fell so fast
The Explainer The newly liberated Syria is in an incredibly precarious position, but it's too soon to succumb to defeatist gloom
By The Week UK Published
-
Romania's election rerun
The Explainer Shock result of presidential election has been annulled following allegations of Russian interference
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Russia's shadow war in Europe
Talking Point Steering clear of open conflict, Moscow is slowly ratcheting up the pressure on Nato rivals to see what it can get away with.
By The Week UK Published