French fury over the new Aukus submarine pact has been something to behold, said Kim Sengupta in The Independent. “There has been a lie,” raged the country’s foreign minister, Jean-Yves Le Drian. “There has been duplicity, there has been a major breach of trust, there has been contempt, so things are not right between us.” The anger has been directed mainly at Washington and Canberra, the key players in the deal that scotched France’s submarine contract with Australia, but “perfidious Albion” has also come under withering fire. Paris withdrew its ambassadors to the US and Australia – but it kept its British ambassador in place, apparently to signal that the UK is too unimportant to merit retribution. As one French official icily put it: “You complain about the bad food in a restaurant to the manager and the chef, not the dishwasher.”
The political stakes are high for Macron, who faces re-election next year – but the anger in France is “legitimate”, said Antoine Bondaz on Politico. France, unlike other EU nations, is “not a spectator” in the Indo-Pacific region: it is “a resident power”. More than 1.6 million of its citizens, including 8,000 soldiers, live in its territories there. Its cancelled submarine deal was supposed to be the cornerstone of a new Indo-Pacific security partnership with Australia, said John Keiger in The Spectator. The Aukus pact has destroyed that vision and left France out in the cold, facing a potential “strategic demotion” as a global power – but raging about that reality will not help Paris. Macron must know that “turning to that old chestnut of calling for greater European defence integration” won’t achieve much in the near future. And it’s certainly not going to make much difference in the Indo-Pacific, “given that other EU states have no naval power to project”. No, if Macron wants France to have a defence and security role in this region, his only choice is to “swallow his pride” and try to work constructively with Aukus.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
-
Should you add your child to your credit card?The Explainer You can make them an authorized user on your account in order to help them build credit
-
Cracker Barrel crackup: How the culture wars are upending corporate brandingIn the Spotlight Is it 'woke' to leave nostalgia behind?
-
'It's hard to discern what it actually means'Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
How drone warfare worksThe Explainer From Ukraine to Iran, it has become clear that unmanned aircraft are rapidly revolutionising modern warfare
-
How the Israel-Iran conflict broke outThe Explainer Israel's strike on Iran's nuclear and missile programmes was years in the planning
-
The state of Britain's Armed ForcesThe Explainer Geopolitical unrest and the unreliability of the Trump administration have led to a frantic re-evaluation of the UK's military capabilities
-
Russia's spies: skulduggery in Great YarmouthIn the Spotlight 'Amateurish' spy ring in Norfolk seaside town exposes the decline of Russian intelligence
-
British defence: the crisis in the Armed ForcesTalking Point Depleted military power may not be able to meet its own commitment to up defence spending to 2.5%
-
Aid to Ukraine: too little, too late?Talking Point House of Representatives finally 'met the moment' but some say it came too late
-
Why Putin is weaponising grain in the war with UkraineUnder the Radar Russian president’s use of food as a strategic weapon could prove brutally effective
-
Putin vs. Wagner: saved by kompromat?Talking Point Analysts believe the mercenary may know too much about the workings of the Kremlin
