Why Putin is weaponising grain in the war with Ukraine
Russian president’s use of food as a strategic weapon could prove brutally effective

The cynicism of Vladimir Putin knows no bounds, said The Sunday Times. Having abandoned the UN-brokered grain deal that ensured safe passage for Ukraine’s crops to markets, despite warnings that it could cause “hunger or worse” in low-income African nations, the Russian president last week had the nerve to pose as a loyal friend of the continent at the Russia-Africa Summit in St Petersburg.
He promised to supply free Russian grain to six African countries, including Eritrea and Somalia. He talked of wiping out debt and quoted Nelson Mandela. It emerged that he had given a helicopter to Zimbabwe’s president. Africa should beware of Putin’s blandishments, said Tafi Mhaka on Al Jazeera. When 43 African heads of state attended the first of these summits nearly four years ago (only 17 attended last week’s meeting), the “nature and scale of Russia’s imperial aggression” wasn’t yet clear. It is now. “Africa needs progressive, law-abiding and dependable partners. It doesn’t need a friend like Russia.”
‘Cynical but effective’
Cynical it may be, but Putin’s use of grain as a strategic weapon could prove brutally effective, said Simon Johnson and Oleg Ustenko in the Los Angeles Times. It threatens to bring about a global food crisis and a surge in disaster-driven migration that will heap pressure on the West. In 2021-22, Ukraine exported between three and six million metric tonnes of grain a month, mostly by ship through the Black Sea. This route is now blocked. Last month, Russian forces destroyed a grain terminal in the port of Odesa, “wiping out storage facilities holding enough grain to feed nearly 300,000 people for a year”.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Ukrainian farmers can still export some grain by road, rail and barge, said The Economist. But this is slower and more expensive, and Russia has started attacking these alternative routes. It’s taking a huge toll on the economy of Ukraine, which relies on food exports. If farmers can’t earn enough, they won’t be able to replant their fields, ruining the next harvest.
‘Giving in to Moscow could exacerbate the problem’
Russia’s blockage of Ukraine’s food exports could spell “disaster for millions” in the developing world, said Simon Jenkins in The Guardian. On humanitarian grounds, we must do all we can to avoid that, even if it means negotiating with Putin and lifting some of our “ineffective” sanctions on Russia’s economy. But giving in to Moscow’s demands will only encourage it to make further use of this pressure point, said Yevgeniya Gaber in The Washington Post. Better to address “the root cause of the problem: Russia’s control of maritime routes”.
If Nato won’t send ships to escort grain vessels through the Back Sea, it must at least provide Ukraine with the means – anti-ship and anti-submarine weapons, jets, long-range missiles – to defend its sea lanes. “Ukraine’s grain is vital for keeping the world fed, and Russia simply cannot be allowed to have a veto on whether it gets to market.”
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Taking aim at Venezuela’s autocrat
Feature The Trump administration is ramping up military pressure on Nicolás Maduro. Is he a threat to the U.S.?
-
Comey indictment: Is the justice system broken?
Feature U.S. attorney Lindsey Halligan has indicted former FBI Director James Comey on charges of lying and obstructing Congress
-
Government shuts down amid partisan deadlock
Feature As Democrats and Republicans clash over health care and spending, the shutdown leaves 750,000 federal workers in limbo
-
How should Nato respond to Putin’s incursions?
Today’s big question Russia has breached Nato airspace regularly this month, and nations are primed to respond
-
Russia’s war games and the threat to Nato
In depth Incursion into Poland and Zapad 2025 exercises seen as a test for Europe
-
What will bring Vladimir Putin to the negotiating table?
Today’s Big Question With diplomatic efforts stalling, the US and EU turn again to sanctions as Russian drone strikes on Poland risk dramatically escalating conflict
-
The mission to demine Ukraine
The Explainer An estimated quarter of the nation – an area the size of England – is contaminated with landmines and unexploded shells from the war
-
Ottawa Treaty: why are Russia's neighbours leaving anti-landmine agreement?
Today's Big Question Ukraine to follow Poland, Finland, Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia as Nato looks to build a new ‘Iron Curtain' of millions of landmines
-
How drone warfare works
The Explainer From Ukraine to Iran, it has become clear that unmanned aircraft are rapidly revolutionising modern warfare
-
How long can Nato keep Donald Trump happy?
Today's Big Question Military alliance pulls out all the stops to woo US president on his peacemaker victory lap
-
How far would Russia go for Iran?
Today's Big Question US air strikes represent an 'embarrassment, provocation and opportunity' all rolled into one for Vladimir Putin