Nagorno-Karabakh: disputed territory ‘laced with mines’ one year on from ceasefire
‘War wounds’ still open as Armenia and Azerbaijan mark first anniversary of deadly conflict
Landmines and unexploded ordnance left behind after intense fighting between Armenia and Azerbaijan last year could take over 10 years to be cleared.
As the two nations mark the first anniversary of the conflict over the disputed region of Nagorno-Karabakh, de-mining agencies have warned that “a lack of resources and insufficient information are complicating the clean-up operation” despite “thousands of munitions” having been removed already, Al Jazeera said.
“Several people have been killed and injured” since the ceasefire last year, the broadcaster added, while events to commemorate the war have served to highlight “the continued tensions over the breakaway region”, Radio Free Europe (RFE) said.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Open wound
In Azerbaijan, “tens of thousands of people rallied” in Baku, the nation’s capital, to “celebrate the country’s victory in the confrontation with Armenian forces that caused the deaths of some 6,000 people on both sides”, reported RFE.
Despite the war being ended 12 months ago by a Russia-brokered ceasefire agreement, it still remains “unclear how many more prisoners remain in captivity on either side”, the broadcaster added.
“All of Azerbaijan celebrates this glorious holiday,” President Ilham Aliyev told troops assembled to mark the celebration of the nation’s first Victory Day event.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
“Azerbaijan has restored its territorial integrity and restored historical justice”, he added. “We have shown the whole world that we are a great nation.”
In Armenia, which was forced to accept the deal “that handed a significant part of Nagorno-Karabakh and surrounding regions it had occupied for nearly three decades back to Azerbaijan”, reactions to the anniversary were far from celebratory, RFE said.
Thousands gathered in Yerevan, the capital, calling for the resignation of Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian and “demanding that the government make no additional concessions” in “Russian-mediated diplomacy to fulfil the terms of the peace agreement”.
In the eyes of Azerbaijanis, the conflict lasting just over one month was a war fought to “liberate” the country’s “lands from occupation”, the Daily Sabah said.
The Turkish pro-government paper – Istanbul provided weapons to Azerbaijan during the war – added that the fighting was seen as a necessary step to “to prosecute Armenia” over “aggressive policies, violations of international law and war crimes”.
In September, the Azerbaijani government filed a case at the UN’s top court, claiming that Armenia engaged in “ethnic cleansing and cultural erasure” while in control of the region and in the ensuing conflict.
But “in the eyes of the Armenian people, the conflict is still unresolved, with last year’s war catching the country off guard”, Nikkei Asia reported.
“Human rights groups have condemned the use of banned weapons during the war”, the site continued, while both countries have accused the other of “breaking the ceasefire”.
Armenians continue to accuse Azerbaijani troops of “unprovoked and sporadic small-arms fire” near border towns, it added. And “there are uncertainties over the status of their soldiers who are prisoners of war or missing in action”.
While the ceasefire has brought to an end the formal fighting in the disputed region, tensions “have remained high”, RFE said.
Days ago, as both countries prepared to mark the anniversary of the ceasefire, one ethnic Armenian was killed and three injured after they “came under fire while repairing water pipes just outside the Azerbaijani-controlled town of Susa”, the broadcaster added.
War scars
The Halo Trust, a non-governmental organisation that helps countries recover after conflict, has warned that “the biggest challenge” when it comes to rebuilding Armenian-held territory “is cluster munitions, which scatter submunitions or bomblets over a wide area”, Al Jazeera said.
The group has so far “found and destroyed almost 2,000 cluster munitions since the end of the war”, however, “found that 68% of inhabited settlements either had cluster munitions or evidence of their use”.
“Cluster munitions have a high failure rate and can cause injuries and fatalities long after war has finished,” Miles Hawthorn, Halo Trust’s programme manager in Nagorno-Karabakh, told the broadcaster.
“The most common type found in Nagorno-Karabakh has a distinctive pink ribbon, which makes them cruelly attractive to children.”
The mistrust between the two warring factions is borne out in research by Human Rights Watch, which found that “at least 71 schools on the Armenian side” and “54 Azerbaijani schools were damaged or destroyed” during the fighting.
In a report entitled Lessons of War, the rights group said that following the ceasefire “civilians who had fled for safety began to return to the areas of Nagorno-Karabakh that remain under Armenian control”.
But “Armenian civilians who used to live in territory that is now controlled by Azerbaijan remain displaced in Armenia or have moved to these Armenian-controlled areas of Nagorno-Karabakh”.
At least 2,000 Russian peacekeepers are still on deployment in the region, an outcome that has left the area at “the tender mercies of a predatory power”, according to Ian Kelly, the former US ambassador to neighbouring Georgia.
Writing in The Atlantic, Kelly, who co-chaired negotiations leading to the ceasefire, warned that the conflict aided Russia’s “abiding desire to reassert its hegemony over what it sees as its historic lands, and to minimise Western involvement in the region”.
“When war broke out in 2020, Putin alone was willing to throw his weight behind getting the fighting to stop,” he added. Russia is now “in the driver’s seat and “the West must step up its diplomatic game before the region slips further beneath the waves of Russia’s illiberal hegemony”.
Like the effort to clear mines from the region, the defusing of hostilities between the two nations will be, at best, a “years-long” effort, Al Jazeera said.
In the meantime, the “war wounds” opened by the six-week conflict will remain open, Nikkei Asia added.
-
The complaint that could change reality TV for ever
In the Spotlight A labour complaint filed against Love Is Blind has the potential to bolster the rights of reality stars across the US
By Abby Wilson Published
-
Assad's fall upends the Captagon drug empire
Multi-billion-dollar drug network sustained former Syrian regime
By Richard Windsor, The Week UK Published
-
Sudoku medium: December 19, 2024
The Week's daily medium sudoku puzzle
By The Week Staff Published
-
Ukraine-Russia: are both sides readying for nuclear war?
Today's Big Question Putin changes doctrine to lower threshold for atomic weapons after Ukraine strikes with Western missiles
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Iran and Israel: is all-out war inevitable?
Talking Points Tehran has vowed revenge for assassinations of Hamas and Hezbollah leaders, but Gaza ceasefire could offer way out
By The Week UK Published
-
'Second only to a nuclear bomb' – the controversial arms Russia is using in Ukraine
The Explainer Thermobaric bombs 'capable of vaporising human bodies' have been used against Ukraine
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Who would fight Europe's war against Russia?
Today's Big Question Western armies are struggling to recruit and retain soldiers amid fears Moscow's war in Ukraine may spread across Europe
By Abby Wilson Published
-
Aid to Ukraine: too little, too late?
Talking Point House of Representatives finally 'met the moment' but some say it came too late
By The Week UK Published
-
The murky role of military contractors in war
The Explainer A civil case against US company has revived debate over the increasing use of private security firms in military operations
By Richard Windsor, The Week UK Published
-
What would happen if World War Three started?
In depth With conflicts in Ukraine, Middle East, Africa and Asia-Pacific, the 'spark' that could ignite all-out war 'already exists'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Why is Islamic State targeting Russia?
Today's Big Question Islamist terror group's attack on 'soft target' in Moscow was driven in part by 'opportunity and personnel'
By Elliott Goat, The Week UK Published