Environmental groups filed a lawsuit Monday against the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), alleging the agency broke federal conservation acts when it allowed the launch of SpaceX's Starship rocket last month.
The lawsuit, filed in Washington, D.C., district court, alleges that the FAA did not conduct an in-depth environmental study on the potential effects of the rocket — the heaviest ever assembled. The launch, which took place in Boca Chica, Texas, on April 20, resulted in the explosion of Starship. While the ship was unmanned, the explosion caused concrete, metal, and debris to be spewed thousands of feet into environmentally protected areas. A 3.5-acre fire also broke out in a nearby state park as a result, CNBC reported.
The FAA allegedly authorized the Starship launch "without complying with bedrock federal environmental law, without fully analyzing the significant environmental and community impacts of the Space X launch program — including destruction of some of the most vital migratory bird habitat in North America — and without requiring mitigation sufficient to offset those impacts," the lawsuit wrote. The suit also notes that the area around the launch site is home to environmentally protected species such as ocelots.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The lawsuit was filed on behalf of five environmental groups. One of them, the Center for Biological Diversity, said in a statement it was "vital that we protect life on Earth even as we look to the stars in this modern era of spaceflight."
The FAA had conducted a less-stringent study prior to the launch, but reported that Starship would have no impact on the environment. SpaceX founder Elon Musk also said after the explosion there had "not been any meaningful damage to the environment." This is despite Musk previously calling Starship "a box of grenades" that would probably explode.
The FAA has not commented on the lawsuit.
-
Should you add your child to your credit card?The Explainer You can make them an authorized user on your account in order to help them build credit
-
Cracker Barrel crackup: How the culture wars are upending corporate brandingIn the Spotlight Is it 'woke' to leave nostalgia behind?
-
'It's hard to discern what it actually means'Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Rabbits with 'horns' sighted across Coloradospeed read These creatures are infected with the 'mostly harmless' Shope papilloma virus
-
Why does the US want to put nuclear reactors on the moon?Today's Big Question The plans come as NASA is facing significant budget cuts
-
Lithium shows promise in Alzheimer's studySpeed Read Potential new treatments could use small amounts of the common metal
-
Scientists discover cause of massive sea star die-offSpeed Read A bacteria related to cholera has been found responsible for the deaths of more than 5 billion sea stars
-
'Thriving' ecosystem found 30,000 feet underseaSpeed Read Researchers discovered communities of creatures living in frigid, pitch-black waters under high pressure
-
What would happen to Earth if humans went extinct?The Explainer Human extinction could potentially give rise to new species and climates
-
New York plans first nuclear plant in 36 yearsSpeed Read The plant, to be constructed somewhere in upstate New York, will produce enough energy to power a million homes
-
Possible dwarf planet found at edge of solar systemUnder the radar The celestial body has an unusual orbit
