Biden ends another war — sort of
After 18 years, the U.S. combat mission in Iraq will come to an end, President Biden and Iraqi Prime Minister Mustafa al-Kadhimi will announce Monday, pursuant to an agreement that includes a specific timeline.
This is excellent news, long overdue. The war in Iraq began under false pretenses and was never necessary for U.S. security. Our long occupation has exacted an obscene cost, and U.S.-orchestrated regime change has significantly been a source of chaos — al Qaeda in Iraq, for example, did not organize until after our 2003 invasion, and Iraq's ancient church will likely never recover from the persecution unleashed by the post-ouster power vacuum and the rise of the Islamic State. Moreover, the Iraqi government has been consistently requesting our departure for more than a year.
But the question remains whether this is truly a departure. Is Biden actually ending U.S. wars or simply downsizing them?
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Consider what's happened with the last two wars Biden "ended." Yes, most U.S. troops will leave Afghanistan by the end of this summer. But, as I wrote in May, airstrikes will continue; there will still be a large presence of "clandestine Special Operations forces, Pentagon contractors, and covert intelligence operatives;" and many of the troops who leave will move just across the border to a neighboring state or Navy vessel so they can continue doing their same work but with a longer commute.
Likewise, in Yemen, Biden said he ended U.S. support for "offensive operations" of the Saudi-led coalition intervention. But his administration has yet to explain what that means and even whether it will stop enabling the Saudi blockade that has Yemen in catastrophic, near-famine conditions. A letter from congressional Democrats asking for details was met with a belated, largely useless reply from Biden's team.
So what about Iraq? As recently as April, Marine Gen. Frank McKenzie, commander of U.S. Central Command, was saying there were no plans to leave Iraq. The language of Monday's announcement, which speaks of ending the "combat mission" rather than full withdrawal, suggests that's still true.
There will still be U.S. forces in Iraq, almost certainly in harm's way, leaving the real possibility of re-escalation when they inevitably come under attack. If not fully ended, the war in Iraq could easily ramp back up — as indeed it did after 2011, when then-President Barack Obama and then-Vice President Joe Biden "brought an end to the combat mission in Iraq."
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Bonnie Kristian was a deputy editor and acting editor-in-chief of TheWeek.com. She is a columnist at Christianity Today and author of Untrustworthy: The Knowledge Crisis Breaking Our Brains, Polluting Our Politics, and Corrupting Christian Community (forthcoming 2022) and A Flexible Faith: Rethinking What It Means to Follow Jesus Today (2018). Her writing has also appeared at Time Magazine, CNN, USA Today, Newsweek, the Los Angeles Times, and The American Conservative, among other outlets.
-
Can 'slow shopping' help you spend less this holiday season?
The explainer You may feel pressured to act fast in order to get the best deals — but this can lead to superfluous spending
By Becca Stanek, The Week US Published
-
Crossword: November 15, 2024
The Week's daily crossword puzzle
By The Week Staff Published
-
Sudoku medium: November 15, 2024
The Week's daily medium sudoku puzzle
By The Week Staff Published
-
'The burden of the tariff would be regressive'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
Should Sonia Sotomayor retire from the Supreme Court?
Talking Points Democrats worry about repeating the history of Ruth Bader Ginsburg
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
'There are benefits, but not acknowledging them would tell only half of the story'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
'The problem with deliverism is that it presumes voters will notice'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
US election: who the billionaires are backing
The Explainer More have endorsed Kamala Harris than Donald Trump, but among the 'ultra-rich' the split is more even
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Donald Trump and the fascism debate
Talking Points Democrats sound the alarm, but Republicans say 'it's always the F-word'
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Harris keeps her crime policies close to the vest
The Explainer How a post-pandemic crime wave changed the Democratic nominee's priorities
By David Faris Published