Elon Musk says he's 'done enough' political spending. What does that really mean?
The world's richest man predicted he'd do 'a lot less' electoral financing moving forward. Has Washington seen the last of the tech titan?


After Tesla CEO Elon Musk played a crucial role in Donald Trump's return to presidential power, the self-proclaimed avatar of "dark, gothic MAGA" announced this week he will "do a lot less" political spending in the future. After giving hundreds of millions of dollars to conservative campaigns, closing his wallet signifies a potentially seismic shift in how Republicans and Democrats alike fundraise.
What did the commentators say?
Musk's claim that he'll step back from political spending is "rippling across the nation's political landscape," said Politico, but that's "if he means it." While Democrats fret that Musk's departure could leave them without "their foil," Republicans who have grown accustomed to Musk's active role worry that they "might be losing their whale." The announcement is Musk's "most explicit" yet regarding his future political finance plans, said The New York Times, even though it "remains unclear" whether he will "ultimately cut off all or most of his political donations." Musk may also simply choose to direct his political giving through nonprofit groups, which keep donor lists private, a "tactic that he used before the 2024 election."
For many political observers, Musk's decision can be traced in no small part back to his unsuccessful $20 million attempt to elect conservative Brad Schimel to the Wisconsin Supreme Court this spring. Schimel's loss left Musk "humiliated," said The New Republic, even if he "pretended he didn't even care about the results." After his Wisconsin defeat, he "deserves to be labeled as toxic," said longtime Wisconsin Republican operative Brandon Scholz to The Associated Press. "He became the campaign. He became the story."
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The announcement may disappoint congressional Republicans who were "likely counting on Musk's largesse" to help them "maintain control" of the legislative branch in next year's midterms, Bloomberg said. But Musk's proclamation "does not mean we've seen the last of his influence in government," said conservative commentator Charlie Sykes at MSNBC. As the wealthiest man on Earth who enjoys an enduring relationship with Trump, the "most powerful man" in the world, Musk can "still do a lot more damage" regardless of his direct political spending plans.
What next?
Musk's plans to cut back "isn't a big surprise for investors" who sent Tesla stock skyward after the announcement, said Barron's. Following his April assertion that he'd be stepping back from his political work in the Trump White House, "anything that indicates Musk is focused on his car company is generally good for the stock." For Musk, the "plan thus far" seems to be to "get back to business," said Foreign Policy. Given how much his various companies are "still hurting and facing more uncertainty from his relationship with Trump," the question for Musk is how he "turns it around and how much more his personal wealth" takes a hit.
However, Musk hasn't counted out changing his mind. When asked whether his decision was based on "blowback" from his political activism, Musk "dodged the question" and instead "left the door open for future outlays on elections," The New York Times said. "If I see a reason to do political spending in the future, I will do it," Musk said. "But I don't currently see a reason."
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Rafi Schwartz has worked as a politics writer at The Week since 2022, where he covers elections, Congress and the White House. He was previously a contributing writer with Mic focusing largely on politics, a senior writer with Splinter News, a staff writer for Fusion's news lab, and the managing editor of Heeb Magazine, a Jewish life and culture publication. Rafi's work has appeared in Rolling Stone, GOOD and The Forward, among others.
-
Hotels with kitchen gardens for a foodie weekend away
The Week Recommends Feast on seasonal produce straight from the veg patch at these country retreats
-
Succession planning as the Dalai Lama turns 90
In the Spotlight China 'determined to shape the narrative' around choice of Tibet's next spiritual leader
-
AI is creating a luxury housing renaissance in San Francisco
Under the Radar Luxury homes in the city can range from $7 million to above $20 million
-
Are masked ICE agents America's new secret police?
Today's Big Question Critics say masks undermine trust in law enforcement
-
Trump's strikes on Iran: a 'spectacular success'?
In Depth Military humiliations 'expose the brittleness' of Tehran's ageing regime, but risk reinforcing its commitment to its nuclear program
-
Will NATO countries meet their new spending goal?
today's big question The cost of keeping Trump happy
-
GOP races to revise megabill after Senate rulings
Speed Read A Senate parliamentarian ruled that several changes to Medicaid included in Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill" were not permissible
-
Trump plans Iran talks, insists nuke threat gone
Speed Read 'The war is done' and 'we destroyed the nuclear,' said President Trump
-
Trump embraces NATO after budget vow, charm offensive
Speed Read The president reversed course on his longstanding skepticism of the trans-Atlantic military alliance
-
Bibi's back: what will Netanyahu do next?
Today's Big Question Riding high after a series of military victories, Israel's PM could push for peace in Gaza – or secure his own position with snap election
-
Is Trump sidelining Congress' war powers?
Today's Big Question The Iran attack renews a long-running debate