Judge orders Trump's NIH grant cuts reversed

What happened

A federal judge in Massachusetts ruled Monday that the Trump administration's decision to cancel more than $1 billion in National Institutes of Health research grants was illegal and discriminatory, and ordered most of the funding restored. The grants were largely directed toward research covering the health of racial minorities, women, and the LGBTQ+ community.

Who said what

The abrupt cancellation of the grants was a result of the administration's crackdown on diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives. Monday's decision settled two lawsuits, one from a group of Democratic-led states and the other from a coalition of researchers and unions led by the American Public Health Association. It "marked at least a temporary win for the academic community," The New York Times said.

In his ruling, U.S. District Judge William Young, a Ronald Reagan appointee, said he had "never seen government racial discrimination like this" in his four decades on the bench, adding, "I would be blind not to call it out. My duty is to call it out." Young's "sweeping rebuke" marked an "extraordinary departure for a federal judge of any era,” said Politico. White House spokesperson Kush Desai said it was "appalling that a federal judge would use court proceedings to express his political views and preferences."

The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

What next?

Andrew Nixon, a spokesperson for the Department of Health and Human Services, said the agency "stands by its decision to end funding for research that prioritized ideological agendas" and was considering an appeal.