What's at stake in Julian Assange's extradition fight?
Prosecutors say he committed espionage. Defenders say the case threatens press freedom.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
After more than a decade in detention and exile, Julian Assange may be on the verge of prosecution for spilling American secrets.
The WikiLeaks founder, imprisoned in the U.K. since 2019, this week faced an extradition hearing in a British court, The Associated Press said. U.S. lawyers told a judge that Assange's "bid to solicit, steal and indiscriminately publish classified U.S. government documents" put lives at risk. Assange, they said, went far beyond the bounds of journalism by encouraging leaker Chelsea Manning to steal the secret files that were published in 2010. "The allegations are that he sought to encourage theft and hacking that would benefit WikiLeaks," said one prosecutor.
But Assange's defenders said the American espionage charges are a form of "state retaliation" after being embarrassed by the WikiLeaks disclosures, the BBC said. Among its startling revelations, WikiLeaks released top-secret files on Guantanamo detainees and a video depicting the U.S. military killing Iraqi civilians and Reuters journalists from an Apache helicopter. "Mr. Assange was exposing serious criminality," said one of Assange's lawyers.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
More broadly, Assange is being championed by a wide array of human rights and media groups who say the American prosecution threatens journalism and free expression, Al Jazeera said. "A successful prosecution of Assange on the basis of this indictment would criminalize a great deal of the investigative journalism that is absolutely crucial to democracy," said Columbia University's Jameel Jaffer.
What did the commentators say?
The charges against Assange are "an iniquitous threat to journalism, with global implications," The Guardian said in an editorial. "Journalists sometimes depend on whistleblowers." That's particularly true in the case of national security, where the stakes "are especially large." And those stakes now include more than Assange's freedom. A successful prosecution could be a "death blow" to investigative reporting that reveals secrets the public has a right to know. "A society that claims to uphold freedom of the press cannot possibly remain indifferent."
"Even Julian Assange's critics should defend him," Thomas Fazi said at UnHerd. WikiLeaks exposed mass surveillance programs, corruption and civilian massacres that had been kept from public scrutiny "and thus allowed to operate with impunity." Those revelations proved that "nominally democratic states are willing to bend and even break the law to silence those who threaten the status quo." The case against Assange is just another example of that phenomenon.
Given the implications, it's tough to find current press voices arguing for Assange's extradition to the U.S. The Economist made the case back in 2019. WikiLeaks "did some good in its early years," the magazine said. But the decision to publish more than 250,000 cables in 2010 "was malicious." Most of the messages revealed no misdeeds, but did put America's diplomatic sources at risk of reprisal. Later on, WikiLeaks "disseminated lurid conspiracy theories" about Hillary Clinton, publishing emails stolen from her campaign by the Russians. Bottom line? "Neither journalists nor activists, like Mr. Assange, have carte blanche to break the law in exercising their First Amendment rights."
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
What next?
The British government decided in 2022 that Assange could be extradited, CBS News said. In this week's hearings — before a pair of London High Court judges — Assange is seeking the right to appeal that decision to the European Court of Human Rights. No ruling came at the end of Wednesday's hearing, and the judges "could take weeks to consider" their decision.
"If the court's decision goes against Assange, he must be extradited within 28 days," CNN said. If convicted on all the charges, he faces up to 175 years in prison. Assange's wife, though, said her husband's health is brittle enough — he had a mini-stroke in 2021 — that an adverse decision could be dire. "His life is at risk every single day he stays in prison," Stella Assange said. "If he is extradited, he will die."
Joel Mathis is a writer with 30 years of newspaper and online journalism experience. His work also regularly appears in National Geographic and The Kansas City Star. His awards include best online commentary at the Online News Association and (twice) at the City and Regional Magazine Association.
-
Democrats push for ICE accountabilityFeature U.S. citizens shot and violently detained by immigration agents testify at Capitol Hill hearing
-
The price of sporting gloryFeature The Milan-Cortina Winter Olympics kicked off this week. Will Italy regret playing host?
-
Fulton County: A dress rehearsal for election theft?Feature Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard is Trump's de facto ‘voter fraud’ czar
-
‘The West needs people’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
‘The censorious effect is the same, even if deployed covertly’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Vietnam’s ‘balancing act’ with the US, China and EuropeIn the Spotlight Despite decades of ‘steadily improving relations’, Hanoi is still ‘deeply suspicious’ of the US as it tries to ‘diversify’ its options
-
‘The sport is still run on a shoestring’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Why is Tulsi Gabbard trying to relitigate the 2020 election now?Today's Big Question Trump has never conceded his loss that year
-
How ‘Manchesterism’ could change the UKThe Explainer The idea involves shifting a centralized government to more local powers
-
What is at stake for Starmer in China?Today’s Big Question The British PM will have to ‘play it tough’ to achieve ‘substantive’ outcomes, while China looks to draw Britain away from US influence
-
‘We know how to make our educational system world-class again’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
