"Make no mistake about it: if people like Jimmy Savile were alive today, they would be perpetrating their crimes online – and Nigel Farage is saying that he is on their side."
Last week's comments by Technology Secretary Peter Kyle, in response to Farage's criticism of the government's new Online Safety Act, are "the talk show equivalent of a declaration of war", said The Telegraph. In political battles, there is no weapon as loaded with controversy as associating your enemy with the DJ and TV presenter believed to be Britain's worst sexual abuser.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The 'weaponisation of suffering'
Kyle's remarks were not a slip of the tongue; they were sanctioned in advance by Downing Street, according to multiple reports.
Ministers believe Farage and Reform UK have "made a misjudgement in pledging to scrap internet safety laws, given the massive unease across the country about what children are viewing online", said Sky News political correspondent Rob Powell. "But the risk inherent in tactics like this is that it makes some on your own side feel a little icky."
When former PM Boris Johnson "dragged Savile's name" into an "attempt to save his disintegrating premiership" and suggested that Keir Starmer had failed to prosecute Savile when he was Director of Public Prosecutions, widespread "disgust" was "felt across the political spectrum", said John Rentoul in The Independent.
Johnson's "deliberate attempt to invoke conspiracy theories driven by fears of paedophilia" prompted his policy adviser, Munira Mirza, to resign, and did little to deflect from the furore around lockdown-busting parties that ultimately ended his tenure as PM.
Richard Scorer, a lawyer who represented survivors of Savile's abuse, condemned Johnson's remarks at the time. And he told The Telegraph last week he felt the same way about Kyle's comments: "It is completely wrong for any politician of any party to seek to score points using the suffering of Savile victims. Victims and survivors want to see action to protect children, not weaponisation of their suffering for political purposes".
An opening for Farage
Johnson's attack on Starmer was "desperate" but it was also "more relevant than Kyle's attack on Farage", said Rentoul. "Farage has nothing to do with Savile" and attempting to "link the Reform leader with a notorious child sex abuser" is not only "gratuitous and offensive" but "makes Kyle seem desperate, and allows Farage to pose as the wronged party".
Now, Farage's criticisms of the Online Safety Act "seem more credible". And, said The Telegraph, Kyle's outburst "opens the door" for Farage to go after Starmer's actions "at the time the first complaints" against Savile were filed in the 2000s.
Reform "sources" have already signalled they "could focus on the PM's record as a prosecutor" and even try to contrast it with their ever-tougher-on-crime stance that is proving popular with voters.
Kyle's comments could "backfire" dramatically, said The Spectator. "Opposing a law that fails to protect children and cracks down on free speech doesn't put you in the same group as Savile", and trying to suggest that it does only makes "one thing clear: Labour is seriously rattled about the rise of Reform".
-
6 homes for entertainingFeature Featuring a heated greenhouse in Pennsylvania and a glamorous oasis in California
-
Obesity drugs: Will Trump’s plan lower costs?Feature Even $149 a month, the advertised price for a starting dose of a still-in-development GLP-1 pill on TrumpRx, will be too big a burden for the many Americans ‘struggling to afford groceries’
-
The ‘Kavanaugh stop’Feature Activists say a Supreme Court ruling has given federal agents a green light to racially profile Latinos
-
Morgan McSweeney: has he lost control of Keir Starmer’s No. 10?In the Spotlight Downing Street chief of staff is under pressure again after a reported ‘shouty’ row with Wes Streeting
-
Asylum hotels: everything you need to knowThe Explainer Using hotels to house asylum seekers has proved extremely unpopular. Why, and what can the government do about it?
-
Will Rachel Reeves’ tax U-turn be disastrous?Today’s Big Question The chancellor scraps income tax rises for a ‘smorgasbord’ of smaller revenue-raising options
-
Will the public buy Rachel Reeves’s tax rises?Today’s Big Question The Chancellor refused to rule out tax increases in her televised address, and is set to reverse pledges made in the election manifesto
-
Five takeaways from Plaid Cymru’s historic Caerphilly by-election winThe Explainer The ‘big beasts’ were ‘humbled’ but there was disappointment for second-placed Reform too
-
The end of ‘golden ticket’ asylum rightsThe Explainer Refugees lose automatic right to bring family over and must ‘earn’ indefinite right to remain
-
Does Reform have a Russia problem?Talking Point Nigel Farage is ‘in bed with Putin’, claims Rachel Reeves, after party’s former leader in Wales pleaded guilty to taking bribes from the Kremlin
-
The Liberal Democrats: on the march?Talking Point After winning their highest number of seats in 2024, can the Lib Dems marry ‘stunts’ with a ‘more focused electoral strategy’?
