Former President Donald Trump is no longer permitted to verbally attack federal prosecutors or court employees working on his election subversion case or go after potential witnesses, after the federal judge overseeing the case reimposed a limited gag order Sunday evening. U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan's reasoning in restoring the gag order, which she imposed on Oct. 16 and agreed to suspend on Oct. 20, was not immediately released.
Trump has argued that the gag order limits his free speech rights, a claim Chutkan initially rejected, saying no other criminal "defendant is permitted to call the prosecutor deranged, or a thug," or intimidate witnesses. After Chutkan agreed to suspend the order, Trump went back to slamming special counsel Jack Smith and sent what prosecutors called "an unmistakable and threatening message" to Mark Meadows, Trump's former White House chief of staff, after it was reported he was given immunity to testify against Trump.
Trump "knows the effect of his targeting and seeks to use it to his strategic advantage," the prosecutors argued in their request to reinstate the gag order. They cited the Meadows posting and examples of "harassment, threats, and intimidation" that followed Trump's other comments.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
"Trump is personally furious about the gag order," The Washington Post reported, citing Trump advisers, "but his campaign sees it as a political asset." If Trump violates Chutkan's order, she will have to decide how to sanction him — a New York judge has fined Trump $15,000 for violating his similar gag order, and "in other cases, violators of gag orders have gone to jail, but the logistics and political implications of imprisoning a former president and current presidential candidate make that unlikely," the Post added.
-
No Kings rally: What did it achieve?Feature The latest ‘No Kings’ march has become the largest protest in U.S. history
-
Push for Ukraine ceasefire collapsesFeature Talks between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin were called off after the Russian president refused to compromise on his demands
-
Trump eyes regime change in VenezuelaFeature Officials believe Trump’s ‘war on narco-terrorism’ is actually a push to remove Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro
-
‘Social media is the new tabloid’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
How are ICE’s recruitment woes complicating Trump’s immigration agenda?TODAY’S BIG QUESTION Lowered training standards and ‘athletically allergic’ hopefuls are hindering the White House plan to turn the Department of Homeland Security into a federal police force
-
Trump vows new tariffs on Canada over Reagan adspeed read The ad that offended the president has Ronald Reagan explaining why import taxes hurt the economy
-
Donald Trump’s week in Asia: can he shift power away from China?Today's Big Question US president’s whirlwind week of diplomacy aims to bolster economic ties and de-escalate trade war with China
-
Marjorie Taylor Greene’s rebellion: Maga hardliner turns on TrumpIn the Spotlight The Georgia congresswoman’s independent streak has ‘not gone unnoticed’ by the president
