Former President Donald Trump is no longer permitted to verbally attack federal prosecutors or court employees working on his election subversion case or go after potential witnesses, after the federal judge overseeing the case reimposed a limited gag order Sunday evening. U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan's reasoning in restoring the gag order, which she imposed on Oct. 16 and agreed to suspend on Oct. 20, was not immediately released.
Trump has argued that the gag order limits his free speech rights, a claim Chutkan initially rejected, saying no other criminal "defendant is permitted to call the prosecutor deranged, or a thug," or intimidate witnesses. After Chutkan agreed to suspend the order, Trump went back to slamming special counsel Jack Smith and sent what prosecutors called "an unmistakable and threatening message" to Mark Meadows, Trump's former White House chief of staff, after it was reported he was given immunity to testify against Trump.
Trump "knows the effect of his targeting and seeks to use it to his strategic advantage," the prosecutors argued in their request to reinstate the gag order. They cited the Meadows posting and examples of "harassment, threats, and intimidation" that followed Trump's other comments.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
"Trump is personally furious about the gag order," The Washington Post reported, citing Trump advisers, "but his campaign sees it as a political asset." If Trump violates Chutkan's order, she will have to decide how to sanction him — a New York judge has fined Trump $15,000 for violating his similar gag order, and "in other cases, violators of gag orders have gone to jail, but the logistics and political implications of imprisoning a former president and current presidential candidate make that unlikely," the Post added.
-
Why does Trump keep interfering in the NYC mayoral race?Today's Big Question The president has seemingly taken an outsized interest in his hometown elections, but are his efforts to block Zohran Mamdani about political expediency or something deeper?
-
Judge lets Cook stay at Fed while appealing ousterSpeed Read Trump had attempted to fire Cook over allegations of mortgage fraud
-
House posts lewd Epstein note attributed to TrumpSpeed Read The estate of Jeffrey Epstein turned over the infamous 2003 birthday note from President Donald Trump
-
Trump threatens critics with federal chargesFeature Days after FBI agents raided John Bolton's home, Trump threatened legal action against Chris Christie
-
Why are Trump's health rumors about more than just presidential fitness?TODAY'S BIG QUESTION Extended absences and unexplained bruises have raised concerns about both his well-being and his administration's transparency
-
'The McDonald's menu board is one fascinating thing'Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
DC sues Trump to end Guard 'occupation'Speed Read D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb argues that the unsolicited military presence violates the law
-
Epstein accusers urge full file release, hint at own listspeed read A rally was organized by Reps. Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie, who are hoping to force a vote on their Epstein Files Transparency Act
