U.S. aid resumes as Ukraine agrees to cease-fire
As Trump pressures Ukraine, NATO and European allies weigh new strategies

What happened
The Trump administration lifted its pause on intelligence sharing and military assistance for Ukraine after Ukraine agreed under pressure to a possible 30-day cease-fire with Russia. At negotiations in Saudi Arabia, the U.S. also said it would assist with humanitarian relief, while Ukraine agreed in principle to a deal to develop its mineral resources, with revenue going toward a reconstruction investment fund that the U.S. would partly own. Conceding territory to Russia — which Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky had once vowed never to do — is on the table, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said. “That’s the only way this is going to end,” he said. “There’s no military solution.” He said it was now up to Russia, which was not at the talks, to accept the cease-fire.
Ukraine said the one-week pause in U.S. intel sharing had resulted in “hundreds of dead Ukrainians” because the country’s defenses were unable to stop a barrage of Russian missiles, but President Trump said Russian President Vladimir Putin was just “doing what anybody else would do” in pressing the advantage. Ukraine fired back this week, launching its largest drone attack on Moscow of the three-year war, killing three people. Meanwhile, at an unprecedented emergency summit in Paris, more than 30 army chiefs from NATO and EU countries as well as Japan and Australia met without the U.S. to discuss how to respond to the Trump administration’s growing rapprochement with Moscow. They proposed posting European troops at key infrastructure sites in Ukraine, with France and the U.K. offering up their own forces for deployment. “The political message is we can do it together, and without the United States,” said one European diplomat, “but it’s clear there are things we can’t do.”
What the editorials said
The cease-fire deal is “an offer Kyiv can’t refuse,” said The Wall Street Journal. Without U.S. assistance, Ukraine had been losing ground, particularly in Russia’s Kursk region. Yet even if Russia accepts, “this will not mean peace in our time.” Putin has broken multiple truces since he first invaded Crimea in 2014. He’d likely use any pause only “for a military respite and to rearm.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
We can only hope that “Ukraine will not be required to give up too much and Russia too little,” said The Dallas Morning News. Trump has demanded painful concessions from Zelensky but nothing from Putin. The only chance at lasting peace is for the U.S. to continue to back Ukraine with weapons and intelligence, and to fully support the presence of European peacekeeping troops as a “red line against Russian aggression.”
What the columnists said
Trump’s cease-fire proposal “just called Putin’s bluff,” said Matthew Chance in CNN.com. The Russians have been gloating about the apparent pro-Kremlin shift in American policy in recent weeks, especially after Trump kicked Zelensky out of the Oval Office last month. But “in exchange for all his courting, concessions, and praise, Trump may now expect Putin to play ball—or risk his wrath.”
That’s wishful thinking, said Trudy Rubin in The Philadelphia Inquirer. “Do not mistake” this cease-fire offer for progress toward peace. Trump has been steadily emboldening Putin—halting cyber operations against Russia, discussing the reopening of consulates— and all while cornering Ukraine into a “suicide deal” that would see it lose chunks of territory with no guarantee that Russia won’t invade again next year. Trump aides are reportedly looking to oust Zelensky, too, having made overtures to his political rivals. “Optimistically,” said Marc Champion in Bloomberg, that might be a smart strategy if Trump thinks Zelensky “just doesn’t get it” and is an obstacle to peace. But it looks like Trump is “deliberately ceding” Eastern Europe to Russia.
“Our policy toward Russia is all carrots and no sticks, and our policy toward Ukraine is all sticks and no carrots,” said Jim Geraghty in National Review. Here’s what Trump has given away so far: Ukraine can’t join NATO. The U.S. won’t send peacekeepers but will send home some 240,000 Ukrainian refugees. And the U.S. won’t seize Russia’s frozen assets or pursue its disinformation networks. If we were really serious about a lasting peace, we’d “arm the Ukrainians to the teeth and make eastern Ukraine look like the bloodiest quagmire for the Russians.” What’s on offer right now isn’t a cease-fire. It’s a “wholesale surrender” to Putin.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
5 jackbooted cartoons about L.A.'s anti-ICE protests
Cartoons Artists take on National Guard deployment, the failure of due process, and more
-
Some of the best music and singing holidays in 2025
The Week Recommends From singing lessons in the Peak District to two-week courses at Chetham's Piano Summer School
-
Sudoku medium: June 14, 2025
The Week's daily medium sudoku puzzle
-
Wall Street has coined a new term for Trump's tariff threats
Feature TACO stands for 'Trump Always Chickens Out'
-
Democrats: Solving the 'man problem'
Feature Democrats are spending millions to win back young men
-
Deportations: A crackdown on legal migrants
Feature The Supreme Court will allow Trump to revoke protections for over 500,000 immigrants
-
Stephen Miller: Trump's extremist 'brain'
Feature Stephen Miller has emerged as an unrivaled power within the White House. What does he want?
-
Musk: What did he achieve in Washington?
Feature Elon Musk leaves his government job but not after bruising his image, slashing aid and firing thousands
-
Courts deal Trump a setback on tariffs
Feature A federal court ruled that Trump misused emergency powers to impose tariffs
-
'The bilateral relationship has eroded'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
'The answer isn't to shake faith in the dollar'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day