MITT ROMNEY has emerged as the clear winner of last night's first presidential debate in Denver, trouncing President Barack Obama by an almost three-to-one margin in snap polls taken in the immediate aftermath of the 90-minute set-piece event.
The Republican challenger was aggressive and combative from the outset, taking the fight to a tired and irritable Obama. Veteran Democrat strategist James Carville told CNN that the President "gave you the impression that this whole thing was a lot of trouble".
Although few felt the debate contained the game-changer that would shift the race in Romney's favour, it will at least serve as a fillip for Republican morale after weeks of Romney gaffes and poor ratings.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
Join more than 350,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with a selection of The Week’s most interesting, enlightening and entertaining stories - plus daily puzzles.
Join more than 350,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with a selection of The Week’s most interesting, enlightening and entertaining stories - plus daily puzzles.
Latest Videos FromThe Week
Poll guru Nate Silver tweeted "I'd be surprised if tonight didn't move the head-to-head polls some (in Romney's direction)."
"In the end there were no zingers; no knockout blows; no major blunders," wrote Gary Younge in The Guardian. "But there was a winner: Mitt Romney. After several reboots and roll-outs he finally, finally found his voice."
Obama had his moments, like on Romney's tax plans, but he lost the debate on style, and failed to even highlight issues thought to be Romney's Achilles’ heel. "Not once did [Obama] mention Bain Capital or Romney's 47 per cent blunder, even when the questions gifted them to him," said Younge.
Chris Matthews, a liberal talk show host on MSNBC, said despairingly: "I don't know what he was doing out there. I know he likes to say he doesn't watch cable television but maybe he should start. I don't know how he let Romney get away with the crap he threw at him tonight about social security."
Remarking on the president's tired demeanour, Roger Simon on Politico offered "one word of advice for Obama before the next debate: caffeine. I had a Pepsi right before the debate started Wednesday night and was tingly for the next 90 minutes. President Obama looked like someone had slipped him an Ambien."
Daily Telegraph blogger Tim Stanley said that "Romney humiliated Obama in the debate", adding that the president fell to pieces without an autocue to tell him what to say and his performance “was a mess”.
"By contrast, Mitt Romney was a human dynamo. This is why the Republicans nominated him: he’s great at debating and he doesn’t look mad," Stanley enthuses. "Mitt was funny, enthusiastic, almost gleeful.
Anything worth remembering from the debate came from Romney’s lips."
Douglas Schoen on Fox News was more moderate, saying that "Romney didn't close the deal in Denver. There were no knock outs. But he made it clear he has an alternative vision. He wasn't seen as extreme, he avoided that attack. But he failed to outline a jobs program or a specific plan to revitalise the economy."
Commenting on the debate's format, Alessandra Stanley in the New York Times said this "was a glaringly public confrontation that looked oddly intimate and personal. And that may help explain why tens of million of people tune in — there is nothing else like it on television".
And many commentators felt the biggest loser from the evening was moderator Jim Lehrer, the veteran news anchor of the publicly funded PBS network who has overseen affairs at 11 previous presidential and vice presidential debates.
"Rather than prodding the candidates on their responses, Lehrer focused on trying to keep them within the 15 minutes allotted for each segment and ensuring that they were given equal speaking time. Yet, he failed even in that task," wrote New York magazine's Margaret Hartmann.
But as Erik Wimple notes in the Washington Post, "Lehrer’s real problem was that, for one night, he had to play stand-in for the entire American media. And if there’s one thing the American public enjoys, it’s bashing the American media, no matter how it performs."
