What happens behind the scenes in Whitehall when power changes hands
Preparations must begin for a possible transition of power to a Labour government, says think tank
The Labour Party should immediately begin talks with the civil service to ensure a smooth transition of power should they win the next general election, according to a major think tank.
The Institute for Government (IfG) has warned that time is running out to prepare both the Labour Party and the civil service for a new government under Keir Starmer. Labour has an enormous 24-point lead in the polls, according to the latest YouGov figures.
With so-called "access talks" between Whitehall mandarins and the opposition typically beginning at around 16 months before polling day, the IfG report says that "time is running short", with the next general election to be held no later than 28 January 2025.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Access talks 'blocked' by Sunak
Cabinet Secretary Simon Case is said to have recommended access talks, only to be "blocked" by Rishi Sunak, who "feared it would lead to civil servants 'downing tools' in preparation for an election", said The Times.
But as leader of the opposition, Starmer "must write a letter formally requesting" access talks, which the prime minister can accept or refuse, said The House. It is unclear whether Starmer has yet requested talks. However, the magazine reported in December that the Labour leader's office has said only "that there have been no talks nor talk of talks".
The party wants to ensure all of its "costings" are correct before they meet with Whitehall officials, according to Labour sources who spoke to the magazine. Until "you've bashed the wrinkles out" of your policies, "there's a real limit on what the civil service can do other than smile and nod", a former mandarin told the magazine.
'Douglas-Home rules'
Pre-election talks between opposition politicians and officials are "established routines" in many countries, said The Economist, and are occasions where "questions can be posed and plans tested" before the transition of power, especially when – as in the UK – there is no formal transition period.
In Britain, there is instead an "awkward dance of hesitant approaches and furtive exchanges" between the opposition and the civil service.
So-called "access talks" began roughly 60 years ago, approved by then-prime minister Alec Douglas-Home. They were allowed under three conditions: they were "discreet", conducted on a "factual basis" and, most importantly, the prime minister had to "know nothing whatsoever" about their content.
But aside from these guidelines, now known as the "Douglas-Home rules", the actual terms of these meetings – such as who should be involved, and when they should happen – remain murky for all involved.
For the prime minister, there is a risk that being seen to "connive with the opposition" will damage party morale, while opposition leaders fret about "appearing presumptuous". And for civil servants too, the process is "awkward" as they attempt to "tactfully" advise shadow ministers under whom they may soon be working, without attracting the ire of the current prime minister.
Yet these talks are an extremely important part of ensuring that if an opposition party takes power, they have given "advance notice (or warning) of their policy priorities", said The New Statesman.
"It's not the civil service advising the opposition," Terence Burns, a former permanent secretary of HM Treasury, told the magazine, but rather "receiving rather than transmitting, so that if the opposition party wins the general election, the civil service can help them to hit the ground running".
'Measuring the curtains'
The Labour Party may face accusations of "measuring the curtains" at No. 10 by triggering access talks, said the IfG, but "history is clear: any opposition that is serious about winning and wants to achieve change should make this a priority in the final 12–18 months before an election".
And whenever these talks do begin, Labour "must make the most of them", said Cath Haddon, a programme director at the IfG, writing for LabourList.
Civil servants will doubtless be facing "many difficulties under a potential Labour government", said The New Statesman, including having to "grapple with rising prices, Brexit, the UK's unbalanced economy, artificial intelligence regulation, climate change" and a plethora of other challenges facing the country.
Access talks will be far from straightforward, not least because "Labour's five missions are not confined neatly to five individual departments, so Starmer and his team will need to work with the Cabinet Office to arrange cross-cutting talks", said Haddon.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Sorcha Bradley is a writer at The Week and a regular on “The Week Unwrapped” podcast. She worked at The Week magazine for a year and a half before taking up her current role with the digital team, where she mostly covers UK current affairs and politics. Before joining The Week, Sorcha worked at slow-news start-up Tortoise Media. She has also written for Sky News, The Sunday Times, the London Evening Standard and Grazia magazine, among other publications. She has a master’s in newspaper journalism from City, University of London, where she specialised in political journalism.
-
The Week contest: Airport goodbyes
Puzzles and Quizzes
By The Week US Published
-
'We shouldn't be surprised that crypto is back'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
How the national debt affects your finances
Rachel Reeves has changed the rules, but why does that matter?
By Marc Shoffman, The Week UK Published
-
Extremism is becoming more common among veterans and service members
Under the Radar Nearly 500 people arrested for extremist crimes between 2017 and 2023 had military backgrounds
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
Is Labour risking the 'special relationship'?
Today's Big Question Keir Starmer forced to deny Donald Trump's formal complaint that Labour staffers are 'interfering' to help Harris campaign
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Why are Democrats suddenly focused on Donald Trump's mental acuity?
Today's Big Question As Election Day looms, Kamala Harris and her allies are mounting a late-stage attack on the former president's mental health — but why now? And will it matter to voters?
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
UK cedes Chagos Islands to Mauritius, minus US base
Speed Read Mauritius has long argued it was forced to give up the islands in 1965 in return for independence from Britain
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How a kidnapped pilot put Free Papua movement in the spotlight
Under the Radar New Zealand pilot Phillip Mehrtens was held for 19 months, drawing international attention to violent insurgency in Indonesia
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The rules on what gifts MPs can accept from donors
The Explainer It's the 'system we have' says Labour cabinet minister as campaigners calls for overhaul of the ministerial code
By The Week Staff Published
-
California's new AI regulations are cracking down on political deepfakes
Under the radar In the age of generative AI, there is a lot of sophisticated fake content floating around the web
By Theara Coleman, The Week US Published
-
Men in Gray suits: why the plots against Starmer's top adviser?
Today's Big Question Increasingly damaging leaks about Sue Gray reflect 'bitter acrimony' over her role and power struggle in new government
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published