The first moon lander launch in decades almost didn't happen

5, 4, 3, 2 … drama

Vulcan launch.
The Vulcan Centaur launch from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station
(Image credit: CHANDAN KHANNA / AFP via Getty Images)

The U.S. recently launched what would have been its first commercial lunar lander since 1972, a flight that nearly stopped before it started. After a successful launch in January, the Peregrine lander was set to land on the moon's surface in February 2024. Part of the plan was for the rocket to deposit some human remains on the moon after landing. This sparked sufficient backlash to nearly ground Peregrine for good. 

What was the goal?

Private landers are instrumental in aiding NASA's Artemis project, which aims to put humans back on the moon and establish a long-term presence there. Peregrine was equipped with data collection gear to relay information about the moon's surface back to NASA. In addition, the lander was aiming to land at the mid-latitudes of the moon while carrying five payloads to be deposited. The payloads contained NASA equipment, as well as items and materials from private companies. "American companies bringing equipment and cargo and payloads to the moon is a totally new industry," NASA deputy associate administrator for exploration Joel Kearns said in a press call.

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

What was the concern?

Part of the Peregrine's payloads included material from two space-burial companies, Celestis and Elysium, which, according to NPR, "allow people to pay to send their loved ones' cremated remains into the cosmos on what are called 'memorial spaceflights.'" The lander was set to deposit the remains of almost 70 people, including George Washington and John F. Kennedy, on the moon. This was a problem for the Navajo Nation. "The moon holds a sacred place in Navajo cosmology," Buu Nygren, president of the Navajo Nation, wrote in a statement. "The suggestion of transforming it into a resting place for human remains is deeply disturbing and unacceptable to our people and many other tribal nations."

Officials from the White House and NASA met with Nygren to discuss the objections from the Navajo Nation, one of the largest of the U.S.'s Indigenous groups. "We really are trying to do the right thing," John Thornton, the chief executive of Astrobotic, told The New York Times. "I hope we can find a good path forward with the Navajo Nation." Both the government and companies sending the remains to space decided the Navajo Nation's concerns weren't "substantive," Celestis CEO Charles Chafer told CNN, and the launch happened as planned. 

Following the meeting, Nygren remarked, "They're not going to remove the human remains and keep them here on Earth where they were created, but instead, we were just told that a mistake has happened," and in the future, they're "going to try to consult with [us]." Kearns, NASA deputy associate administrator for exploration, added, "Those communities may not understand that these missions are commercial, and they're not U.S. government missions." In a rocket-powered bit of irony, the contested remains are not likely to make it to the moon anyhow. The spacecraft suffered a critical propellant loss from a fuel leak, precluding Peregrine from sticking its lunar landing.

Devika Rao, The Week US

 Devika Rao has worked as a staff writer at The Week since 2022, covering science, the environment, climate and business. She previously worked as a policy associate for a nonprofit organization advocating for environmental action from a business perspective.