Read Trump's garbled argument about how Obama was dealt an easier economic hand

During a wide-ranging interview on Tuesday, The Washington Post's Philip Rucker asked President Trump about the raft of bad economic news, noting dips in the stock market and GM's decision to close five auto plants and lay off 15,000 workers. Trump pointed to his trade deals, blamed the Federal Reserve's interest rate hikes, said he's "not blaming anybody," then offered this explanation, apparently arguing that former President Barack Obama had less challenging economic headwinds than he's weathered:

It's not clear how Obama's "rules" were different, or why inheriting a historically brutal recession, as Obama did, was better than Trump's taking office in the middle of a long economic upturn. Trump appears to be specifically complaining about the Fed's slow increase in interest rates and its balance-sheet reduction via unloading billions of dollars worth of bonds — "pay-downs" clearly doesn't refer to paying down the ballooning national debt — but it certainly isn't obvious what he's talking about.

Trump, like all of us, fares better with an editor — reading his transcribed interviews is always an adventure — but presumably he makes sense to himself. "I have a gut," he told Rucker, "and my gut tells me more sometimes than anybody else's brain can ever tell me." You can peruse the entire (annotated) interview at The Washington Post.

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up