Trump suggests he 'wouldn't let' the CIA use Kim Jong Un's brother as a source under his watch


To be honest, it's not really clear what President Trump meant when he brought up Kim Jong Un's brother at a press gaggle on Tuesday.
The North Korean leader's half brother, whom Kim is suspected of ordering the murder of in 2017, was reported Monday to be a CIA informant prior to his death. But when Trump was asked about the news on Tuesday, he responded by saying "I wouldn't let that happen under my auspices."
Trump was seemingly asked about the report on Tuesday, but his full quote on the matter doesn't exactly clear things up. "I saw the information about the CIA with respect to [Kim Jong Un's] brother ... and I would tell him that would not happen under my auspices," Trump said. That could mean Trump wouldn't let his metaphorical half brother lend information to foreign intelligence agencies, or it could mean he wouldn't let the CIA work with Kim's family. But judging by Trump's favorable discussion of Kim both before and after his "auspices" drop, it seems to be the latter. Watch the whole clip below. Kathryn Krawczyk
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Kathryn is a graduate of Syracuse University, with degrees in magazine journalism and information technology, along with hours to earn another degree after working at SU's independent paper The Daily Orange. She's currently recovering from a horse addiction while living in New York City, and likes to share her extremely dry sense of humor on Twitter.
-
Can Texas redistricting save the US House for the GOP?
Today's Big Question Trump pushes a 'ruthless' new plan, but it could backfire
-
'No one should be surprised by this cynical strategy'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Intellectual property: AI gains at creators' expense
Feature Two federal judges ruled that it is fair use for AI firms to use copyrighted media to train bots
-
SCOTUS greenlights mass DOE firings
Speed Read The Supreme Court will allow the Trump administration to further shrink the Education Department
-
Cuomo announces third-party run for NYC mayor
Speed Read He will go up against progressive Democratic powerhouse Zohran Mamdani and incumbent Mayor Eric Adams
-
Secret Service 'failures' on Trump shooting
Speed Read Two new reports detail security breakdowns that led to attempts on the president's life
-
Trump set to hit Canada with 35% tariffs
Speed Read The president accused Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney of failing to stop the cross-border flow of fentanyl
-
Mahmoud Khalil files $20M claim over ICE detention
Speed Read This is the 'first damages complaint' brought by an individual targeted by the Trump's administration's 'crackdown' on Gaza war protesters
-
Trump threatens Brazil with 50% tariffs
Speed Read He accused Brazil's current president of leading a 'witch hunt' against far-right former leader Jair Bolsonaro
-
AI scammer fakes Rubio messages to top officials
Speed Read The unknown individual mimicked Rubio in voice and text messages sent to multiple government officials
-
SCOTUS greenlights Trump's federal firings
speed read The Trump administration can conduct mass federal firings without Congress' permission, the Supreme Court ruled