Biden's SCOTUS commission gives Democrats a rallying cry

The Supreme Court.
(Image credit: Illustrated | iStock)

Don't pack the Supreme Court.

At least, that's what the expert commision appointed by President Biden said. Thursday night, the panel released "discussion materials" that amount to a preliminary version of its anticipated report. Although they endorsed some possible reforms, most commissioners concluded that increasing the number of justices to boost Democrats' influence risks the court's legitimacy.

The result is not unexpected, but the commission's findings were a blow to progressives' goals. Fearful of the court's 6-3 conservative majority and angered by the Senate's refusal to consider former President Barack Obama's nomination of Merrick Garland (now Biden's attorney general), they hoped this report would build momentum for more sweeping change. "The GOP's rigged bench is contorting our laws and issuing decisions that do not reflect, understand, or serve the people the court is meant to represent," said Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and Reps. Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.), Hank Johnson (D-Ga.), and Mondaire Jones (D-N.Y.) in a statement Thursday. "We must pass legislation to expand the Supreme Court."

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

One proposal the commission viewed more favorably was term limits for Supreme Court justices. An 18-year rotating schedule would open two seats during each four-year presidential term and could lower the temperature of national politics and create a sense of bipartisan balance. The problem, commissioners noted, is that implementing this idea would require a constitutional amendment. Under today's polarized conditions, that's very unlikely to happen.

Yet with the court stuck as-is for the foreseeable future, progressive criticisms of the commision's conclusions shouldn't necessarily be taken at face value. Though they decry the court's swing to the right, Democrats know upcoming decisions on abortion, guns, and other culture war issues could help them mobilize dispirited supporters in 2022 — and perhaps 2024.

One reason the Supreme Court acquired its present exaggerated significance is that members of Congress relish the opportunity to run against a hostile court. When liberals dominated the judiciary, that strategy helped build the conservative movement — and the modern Republican party. Now it may be Democrats' turn to rail against tyrants in black robes.

To continue reading this article...
Continue reading this article and get limited website access each month.
Get unlimited website access, exclusive newsletters plus much more.
Cancel or pause at any time.
Already a subscriber to The Week?
Not sure which email you used for your subscription? Contact us
Samuel Goldman

Samuel Goldman is a national correspondent at TheWeek.com. He is also an associate professor of political science at George Washington University, where he is executive director of the John L. Loeb, Jr. Institute for Religious Freedom and director of the Politics & Values Program. He received his Ph.D. from Harvard and was a postdoctoral fellow in Religion, Ethics, & Politics at Princeton University. His books include God's Country: Christian Zionism in America (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2018) and After Nationalism (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2021). In addition to academic research, Goldman's writing has appeared in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and many other publications.