Did Americans have anything to celebrate on Independence Day?
Recent Supreme Court decisions might have put a damper on the spirit of the Fourth of July


The Fourth of July is typically a day for Americans to celebrate the foundation of the nation's democracy. Still, some find it hard to be jovial this year amid a spate of Supreme Court decisions that appear to undermine those ideals. For many, it was too hard to get in the spirit of the holiday when it appeared that many of our fundamental freedoms could be at risk.
Gallup poll results released in late June indicated that less than 4 in 10 adults describe themselves as "extremely proud" to be American, continuing to maintain "last year's record low and down from about 7 in 10 two decades ago," The Washington Post reported. In today's increasingly polarized political climate and with patriotism on the decline, was there anything worth celebrating on Independence Day?
Americans need both "reckoning and celebration"
This year, the Fourth of July brought an "uneasy political divide into focus," Cristina Beltrán wrote at Politico. The U.S. is split between those who believe the nation "requires a reckoning and those demanding only celebrations." Progressives might be more comfortable with "highlighting hypocrisy than extolling the aspects of American life that make us proud," but only focusing on the negatives makes it easier for conservatives to "caricature our beliefs and commitments." The nation needs "something richer than patriotism" and "more than righteous indignation and anxious disavowal," Beltrán opined. "As a people, we need reckoning and celebration."
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Esau McCaulley agreed that "uncritical celebration is a limited and false definition of patriotism" in The New York Times. Instead of succumbing to pressure to "put our complaints aside" for Independence Day, "recounting the full story of America and asking it to be better than it is can be an expression of love," McCaulley suggested. "I don't think we have to be proud of everything this country has done to be proud of our progress despite unrelenting opposition."
There was "much to celebrate" on the Fourth of July
For one, Independence Day is a time to celebrate the country's "proven capacity for renewal and self-improvement," The Washington Post editorial board wrote. Our country's system of democracy has been maintained by "its ability to correct and recalibrate." While people might say, "things have never been this bad," that belief is "as historically myopic as it is objectively wrong" because "by almost every metric, the United States is better off than 200 — or even 20 — years ago," the board contends. "Despite the corrosiveness of self-doubt and political tribalism, there is much to celebrate." Our values have "matured and endured," and while the U.S. is "still far from perfect," the Post's editorial board still believes " it's an experiment worth pursuing."
In the wake of a spate of contentions Supreme Court decisions, it had admittedly been a "grim week or so in the United States" leading up to the holiday, Margaret Sullivan acknowledged in The Guardian. But there are still "reasons to feel encouraged about the future of the nation," such as the Electoral Count Act reform, a "successful effort in Congress to protect democracy and electoral integrity." The criminal prosecution of the Jan. 6 insurrectionists is "heartening as well" because it shows that to "some degree, the democratic guardrails are holding and the rule of law prevailing."
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Theara Coleman has worked as a staff writer at The Week since September 2022. She frequently writes about technology, education, literature and general news. She was previously a contributing writer and assistant editor at Honeysuckle Magazine, where she covered racial politics and cannabis industry news.
-
Trump uses tariffs to upend Brazil's domestic politics
IN THE SPOTLIGHT By slapping a 50% tariff on Brazil for its criminal investigation into Bolsonaro, the Trump administration is brazenly putting its fingers on the scales of a key foreign election
-
3 questions to ask when deciding whether to repair or replace your broken appliance
the explainer There may be merit to fixing what you already have, but sometimes buying new is even more cost-effective
-
'Trump's authoritarian manipulation of language'
Instant Opinion Vienna has become a 'convenient target for populists' | Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
The Supreme Court and Congress have Planned Parenthood in their crosshairs
Talking Points Trump's budget bill and the court's ruling threaten abortion access
-
SCOTUS greenlights Trump's federal firings
speed read The Trump administration can conduct mass federal firings without Congress' permission, the Supreme Court ruled
-
U.S. v. Skrmetti: Did the trans rights movement overreach?
Feature The Supreme Court upholds a Tennessee law that bans transgender care for minors, dealing a blow to trans rights
-
Supreme Court lets states ax Planned Parenthood funds
Speed Read The court ruled that Planned Parenthood cannot sue South Carolina over the state's effort to deny it funding
-
'If smoke can affect health early in life, it also can affect life's end'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Supreme Court clears third-country deportations
Speed Read The court allowed Trump to temporarily resume deporting migrants to countries they aren't from
-
Discrimination: Expanding the definition
Feature The Supreme Court ruled in favor of a straight woman who sued her gay boss for discrimination
-
Deportations: A crackdown on legal migrants
Feature The Supreme Court will allow Trump to revoke protections for over 500,000 immigrants