Aspartame and cancer: should you stop drinking Diet Coke?
The artificial sweetener could soon be designated as "possibly carcinogenic to humans"
The World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) is set to deem aspartame, the artificial sweetener used in many diet sodas and chewing gums, "possibly carcinogenic to humans," Reuters reported at the end of June. The impending ruling "does not take into account how much of a product a person can safely consume," Reuters continued. Instead, the WHO and the Food and Agriculture Organization's Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) is set to decide appropriate consumption levels in a different report. Both analyses — the IARC's and the JECFA's — will be released on July 14.
But the unconfirmed news is already causing quite a stir. Aspartame has been considered safe for consumption since 1974 and was approved as a general sweetener in 1996, per Bloomberg. "There is broad consensus in the scientific and regulatory community that aspartame is safe," the American Beverage Association told the outlet. Still, however, this is not the first time research has shown a link between aspartame and cancer — last year, a study tied the sweetener to increased risks of "breast cancer ... and obesity-related cancers." The Center for Science in the Public Interest also flagged the artificial sweetener to the IARC back in 2014 and 2019, citing "compelling evidence that it causes cancer and is a potent carcinogen," Bloomberg continued. Assuming Reuters' reporting is correct, and the "possibly carcinogenic" classification is on its way, is it actually time to ditch diet soda?
Don't panic
The IARC "is not the agency that consumers should listen to with regard to food safety" because it is only equipped to assess the "hazard of a given substance" and "not the risk," Victoria Song wrote for The Verge. For example, while there is "a hazard of a meteor destroying the Earth or the sun causing skin cancer," that's "not what matters to the average person." The bottom line? Don't base your decision to consume aspartame on "a leaked report from a non-food safety agency."
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The categories into which the IARC sorts these things "do one very specific thing," Amanda Mull mused for The Atlantic: "They describe how definitive the agency believes the evidence is for any level of increased risk, even a very tiny one." The "possibly carcinogenic" category, into which aspartame may soon be sorted, "makes no grand claims about carcinogenicity." It just communicates "how sure or unsure the organization is that there's a risk associated with a thing or substance at all."
In other words, "they're saying there is some evidence, but they're not saying the evidence is foolproof, and they're not saying anything about how risky it is," Kevin McConway, emeritus professor of applied statistics at the Open University in England, told Slate's Dan Kois. The actual threshold of consumption will be dictated by the JECFA.
Sure, "in a perfect world, you'd only drink plain water, but human beings like their flavor and [diet soda] is one way to get it without consuming a pile of calories," fitness coach Mitch Calvert lamented in the Winnipeg Free Press. "If a diet drink helps you reduce night-time snacking ... have at it." There are hundreds of studies that prove aspartame safe for human consumption, he said, and "unless you're a rat, or guzzle 20-plus diet drinks per day, you have nothing to worry about in moderation."
Perhaps we should listen ...
Maybe we shouldn't completely disregard the IARC's findings here, Keren Landman noted in a piece for Vox. "The way IARC conducts its evaluations gives its assessments a particularly high level of integrity," she wrote, meaning it's "worth paying attention to the agency's take on product safety." The IARC is also selective in using "unpublished, confidential commercial data," and takes care to "exclude people with conflicts of interest from contributing to its evaluations," something that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration or the European Food Safety Authority might struggle with.
Moreover, it's "mind-blowingly lazy to not explore the dangerous effects associated with these ingredients that are proven over and over," Huib van Bockel, founder of Tenzing Natural Energy drink, remarked in a piece for The Drum. "The lobby to keep these artificial sweeteners firmly in our drinks is real," and it's spending "tens of billions" on marketing to bolster its case, he claimed. "I guess, as always, it will become a David versus Goliath battle."
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Devika Rao has worked as a staff writer at The Week since 2022, covering science, the environment, climate and business. She previously worked as a policy associate for a nonprofit organization advocating for environmental action from a business perspective.
-
Will auto safety be diminished in Trump's second administration?
Today's Big Question The president-elect has reportedly considered scrapping a mandatory crash-reporting rule
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
One great cookbook: 'A Girl and Her Greens' by April Bloomfield
The Week Recommends Vegetables deserve the best. In this chef-author's hands, they achieve their ultimate potential.
By Scott Hocker, The Week US Published
-
DeSantis appoints Florida's top lawyer to US Senate
Speed Read The state's attorney general, Ashley Moody, will replace Sen. Marco Rubio in the Senate
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
The decline of the contraceptive pill
In the Spotlight Fears of the pill's side effects, stoked by social media, behind switch to fertility trackers – or no contraception at all
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
What are the long-term effects of alcohol?
It's not just cancer
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
How close are we to a norovirus vaccine?
Today's Big Question A new Moderna trial raises hopes of vanquishing a stomach bug that sickens millions a year
By David Faris Published
-
Kidney stones are affecting children far more than they once did
Under the radar Salt may be to blame
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
HMPV is spreading in China but there's no need to worry
The Explainer Respiratory illness is common in winter
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Walking pneumonia cases are picking up pace
The explainer Another respiratory illness to be wary of
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
California declares bird flu emergency
Speed Read The emergency came hours after the nation's first person with severe bird flu infection was hospitalized
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
The future of fluoridated water is up for debate
The Explainer The oral benefits are watery
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published