David Cameron considered arming and training a 100,000-strong army of Syrian rebels to defeat president Bashar al-Assad, it has emerged. The secret plan was proposed two years ago but rejected as being too risky, says the BBC’s Newsnight.
The initiative was the brainchild of General Sir David Richards, now Lord Richards, at the time the UK’s most senior military officer. It was seriously considered by the Prime Minister, the National Security Council and US officials.
Richards’s “extract, equip, train” plan involved an international coalition turning the rebels into a concerted fighting force at camps set up in Turkey and Jordan. He intended to vet the participants to ensure they were moderates.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
It would take a year, Richards believed. Then, the troops would return to Syria for a “shock and awe” campaign with Syrian fighters on the ground and support from fighter jets supplied by Gulf states and the West.
During the training period, there would be time for an alternative Syrian government to be formed in exile.
Monzer Akbik, from the opposition group the Syrian National Coalition, said: “A huge opportunity was missed and that opportunity could have saved tens of thousands of lives actually and could have saved also a huge humanitarian catastrophe.
“The international community did not intervene to prevent those crimes and at the same time it did not actively support the moderate elements on the ground.”
Professor Michael Clarke of the Royal United Services Institute told the BBC that it was too late now for a plan which would have been “dangerous”. He said: “We have missed the opportunity to train an anti-Assad force that would have real influence in Syria when he is removed, as he will be.
“I think there was an opportunity two or three years ago to have become involved in a reasonably positive way, but it was dangerous and swimming against the broader tide of history… and the costs and the uncertainties were very high.”
In three years of civil war in Syria, tens of thousands have died and millions more have been displaced.
-
Political cartoons for October 25Cartoons Saturday’s political cartoons include hospital bill trauma, Independence Day, and more
-
Roasted squash and apple soup recipeThe Week Recommends Autumnal soup is full of warming and hearty flavours
-
Ukraine: Donald Trump pivots againIn the Spotlight US president apparently warned Volodymyr Zelenskyy to accept Vladimir Putin’s terms or face destruction during fractious face-to-face
-
Sanae Takaichi: Japan’s Iron Lady set to be the country’s first woman prime ministerIn the Spotlight Takaichi is a member of Japan’s conservative, nationalist Liberal Democratic Party
-
Russia is ‘helping China’ prepare for an invasion of TaiwanIn the Spotlight Russia is reportedly allowing China access to military training
-
Interpol arrests hundreds in Africa-wide sextortion crackdownIN THE SPOTLIGHT A series of stings disrupts major cybercrime operations as law enforcement estimates millions in losses from schemes designed to prey on lonely users
-
China is silently expanding its influence in American citiesUnder the Radar New York City and San Francisco, among others, have reportedly been targeted
-
How China uses 'dark fleets' to circumvent trade sanctionsThe Explainer The fleets are used to smuggle goods like oil and fish
-
Syria's returning refugeesThe Explainer Thousands of Syrian refugees are going back to their homeland but conditions there remain extremely challenging
-
One year after mass protests, why are Kenyans taking to the streets again?today's big question More than 60 protesters died during demonstrations in 2024
-
What happens if tensions between India and Pakistan boil over?TODAY'S BIG QUESTION As the two nuclear-armed neighbors rattle their sabers in the wake of a terrorist attack on the contested Kashmir region, experts worry that the worst might be yet to come
