Why I won't vote in November
Here's why I am both #NeverTrump and #NeverHillary
Now that Donald Trump is the presumptive Republican nominee for president, every officeholder and opinion maker associated with the American right is expected to announce whether they support him. Everyone is anxious to put their cards on the table.
Here are mine: I am both #NeverTrump and #NeverHillary, because I know how I will feel on election day.
When I was younger, I made a habit of voting for hopeless third party candidacies, hoping to send a message of disgust with the two parties as they were. Now I think that message is better sent by simply not voting at all. And I will send it again this November.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
If Clinton wins the presidency, I'll feel a little bit relieved and sad. And if Trump wins the presidency, I might crack a smile. But I'll wake up every morning afterward and immediately make sure my family's passports are in order.
A Hillary Clinton presidency certainly means the end of a divided era on the Supreme Court and the consolidation of liberal gains in the judiciary. In turn that means the reversal of incremental pro-life gains on the state level. It will mean more and more pitched battles over religious liberty that will gradually hamper the ability of my co-religionists to run their colleges, schools, and other businesses according to their consciences.
Since Clinton was shaped by the fear that Democrats lose elections for not being "tough" enough on foreign policy, she is likely to blunder with American air power. The model for these disasters is her Libyan intervention or the intervention in Kosovo. Both were launched in the name of human rights and empowered Islamist extremists in the end.
However, all the imaginable demerits of a Clinton presidency are known to me. I can anticipate them. They are just intensifications of the sort of political frustrations I already have.
Trump's victory would be something else altogether. In part because a Trump victory would, by definition, involve the defeat of nearly every certainty in America's political culture. That, I might enjoy. The status quo deserves a major upset. But I would be very nervous.
Theoretically, I should be cheered that someone running against Washington's stupid wars and against an out-of-control immigration system won. But Trump is mostly lying about his foreign policy judgment. When wars are on the horizon, he generally supports them. And his nationalist views on immigration and trade are practically labeled "for the rubes."
He openly mocks his own supporters when he says that he could shoot someone and not lose a vote. He admits, "If it gets a little boring... I just say, 'We will build the wall!'" When his campaign says that Trump "doesn't want to waste time on policy and thinks it would make him less effective on the stump," he is intermittently breaking the fourth wall and letting everyone know just how stupid he thinks his supporters are. The truth is that if Trump cared about American workers, he would invest in them. He wouldn't get on a debate stage and claim that America is too hot for American workers.
Trump's great political advantages are his shamelessness, his ignorance, his touchy ego, and his complete freedom from the norms of our political culture. These traits made him dangerous to other Republicans when Trump was just one candidate among many. And they would make him dangerous to his countrymen if he were invested with the awesome powers of the presidency. Without the constraints of party orthodoxy, without the restraint of personal shame, we would be electing a man with a hyper-sensitive personality and little working knowledge of government to lead the most important nation on Earth.
I'm still the sort of conservative who thinks it wrong to knowingly elect people of low and base character to high offices. But the most important reason I'll be nervous if Trump wins is this: His victory will invite foreign rivals to challenge the United States, and I simply don't want the man who goes to DEFCON 1 on TV rivals like Rosie O'Donnell to be the person who actually gets to command our armed forces to go to DEFCON 1.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Michael Brendan Dougherty is senior correspondent at TheWeek.com. He is the founder and editor of The Slurve, a newsletter about baseball. His work has appeared in The New York Times Magazine, ESPN Magazine, Slate and The American Conservative.
-
7 drinks for every winter need possible
The Week Recommends Including a variety of base spirits and a range of temperatures
By Scott Hocker, The Week US Published
-
'We have made it a crime for most refugees to want the American dream'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Anya Jaremko-Greenwold, The Week US Published
-
Was the Azerbaijan Airlines plane shot down?
Today's Big Question Multiple sources claim Russian anti-aircraft missile damaged passenger jet, leading to Christmas Day crash that killed at least 38
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: who the billionaires are backing
The Explainer More have endorsed Kamala Harris than Donald Trump, but among the 'ultra-rich' the split is more even
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
1 of 6 'Trump Train' drivers liable in Biden bus blockade
Speed Read Only one of the accused was found liable in the case concerning the deliberate slowing of a 2020 Biden campaign bus
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Biden, Trump urge calm after assassination attempt
Speed Reads A 20-year-old gunman grazed Trump's ear and fatally shot a rally attendee on Saturday
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published