How ‘landmark’ right to be forgotten case will change Google search results
Search giant wins four-year legal battle against tougher privacy laws
The EU’s highest court has ruled that Google does not have to remove links to personal data from its worldwide search results.
The judgment by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) brings to an end a four-year dispute between the search giant and French privacy regulator CNIL, the BBC reports.
In 2015, CNIL ordered Google to remove links to pages containing “damaging or false information about a person” from its global search results under the “right to be forgotten” laws, the broadcaster says.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Google introduced a “geoblocking” feature the following year, preventing users in Europe from viewing “delisted links”.
But it refused to censor search results for users in other parts of the world and contested a €100,000 (£88,100) fine issued by the French privacy watchdog, says The Verge.
“There is no obligation under EU law, for a search engine operator who grants a request for de-referencing made by a data subject… to carry out such a de-referencing on all the versions of its search engine,” the ECJ’s ruling said.
While the court’s decision means that Google is not under obligation to remove links from global searches that fall under the right to be forgotten laws, the company is still required to censor results for users in Europe.
What is the “right to be forgotten”?
The right to be forgotten was introduced by the ECJ in 2014 as a means of erasing “irrelevant and outdated material” in Europe, The Daily Telegraph explains.
In principle, the rights mean that any “embarrassing or incorrect information” about an individual, such as their “sexual history or criminal convictions”, that is available online can be erased upon request, the newspaper says.
In the case of Google’s dispute with CNIL, the French privacy watchdog said that the “international nature of the internet” could result in a person’s reputation being affected even if their personal information is deleted from search results in their region, the paper adds.
Google, on the other hand, argues that authoritarian governments could abuse right to be forgotten laws if they were policed outside of the European Union, to “cover up human rights abuses”, The Guardian says.
How will the ruling affect Google search results?
The Telegraph claims that the case was a “test” to see if the EU could “extend its laws beyond its borders” and whether a person could remove their personal information from the global web “without stifling free speech”.
With the ruling going in Google’s favour, the company needs to remove links to sensitive information only from European search results after receiving a takedown request from an EU citizen. Therefore, the information would still be visible in search results made by users outside of the EU.
There was a “second ruling”, which stated that tech companies are not “automatically” required to remove links just because they contain information about someone’s sex life or criminal convictions, the BBC says.
The ECJ, however, said that links that do not fall under the right to be forgotten laws, but are classified as containing sensitive information, should “fall down search result listings over time”, the broadcaster adds.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
US election: who the billionaires are backing
The Explainer More have endorsed Kamala Harris than Donald Trump, but among the 'ultra-rich' the split is more even
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'United States of Anxiety'
Today's Newspapers A roundup of the headlines from the US front pages
By The Week Staff Published
-
Langdale Chase Hotel: a cosy nook in the Lake District
The Week Recommends This Victorian villa has breathtaking views and expansive gardens
By Natasha Langan Published
-
'Stunningly lifelike' AI podcasts are here
Under the Radar Users are amazed – and creators unnerved – by Google tool that generates human conversation from text in moments
By Abby Wilson Published
-
Will the Google antitrust ruling shake up the internet?
Today's Big Question And what does that mean for users?
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Wall Street tumbles on poor tech results
Speed Read US markets had their worst day since 2022 as Tesla and AI stocks dropped
By Arion McNicoll, The Week UK Published
-
Why is the tech industry up in arms about Google's search algorithm leak?
Today's Big Question A leak of about 2,500 documents shed light on how Google's search engine operates, and not everyone is happy
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
How AI is going to change the Google search experience
Talking Points Summaries are the new links
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Google unveils 'AI overviews' atop search results
Speed Read Users of the search engine in the US will now get AI-generated answers first
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Perplexity AI: has Google finally met its match?
In The Spotlight Generative AI start-up provides fast, Wikipedia-like responses to search queries
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Artificial history
Opinion Google's AI tailored the past to fit modern mores, but only succeeded in erasing real historical crimes
By Theunis Bates Published