Why Iran has erupted into protest
Hundreds of people have died in widespread unrest following fuel price hikes
The Iranian government has admitted that its security forces shot and killed protesters taking part in street demonstrations across the country last month.
President Hassan Rouhani had been accused of “deliberately covering up the scale of the crackdown on the four days of unrest in more than 100 locations”, the BBC reports. Amid growing condemnation from the international community, Iran’s state-run IRTV2 channel broadcast a report this week confirming that police had killed people described as “armed thugs and rioters” who had allegedly attacked sensitive or military centres.
Amnesty International says that at least 208 protesters were killed in the clashes, with some estimates putting the death toll as high as 400. During a trip to London this week for a Nato summit, US President Donald Trump even claimed that “Iran is killing perhaps thousands and thousands of people right now as we speak”.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Why are Iranians protesting?
The protests began peacefully on 15 November “following a sudden government announcement about a fuel price hike which will have a detrimental impact on people who are already struggling amid Iran’s economic crisis”, says the Amnesty International website.
Under the changes, the price of petrol rose by 50% to 15,000 rials (£0.09 at the unofficial market exchange rate) a litre, and drivers were told they would be allowed to purchase only 60 litres each month before the price rose to 30,000 rials (£0.18).
The New York Times says that the energy policy “appeared to be the latest attempt by the Islamic Republic to manage an economic crisis worsened by American sanctions that have sharply reduced oil exports”.
Iranian officials this week reported that an estimated 200,000 people were involved in the protests, with a total of around 7,000 arrests made in cities and towns nationwide.
Crackdown
As the protests grew larger, the government took the unprecedented decision to shut down internet services in the country for more than a week, making it “hard to gather information about what was happening on the streets”, says the BBC. However, “video footage that reached the outside world appeared to show security forces shooting at unarmed demonstrators”, the broadcaster continues.
Rouhani subsequently “blamed the protests on foreign meddling and said his government had successfully pacified demonstrators”, Al Jazeera reports.
Although Tehran has now confirmed that there were fatalities during the unrest, no figures have been given. Along with “armed thugs and rioters”, those killed included security personnel, passers-by hit by crossfire or victims of “suspicious shootings”, according to the authorities.
Response
Philip Luther, Amnesty’s Middle East research and advocacy director, has said the number of deaths confirmed by his organisation is “evidence that Iran’s security forces went on a horrific killing spree”, The Guardian reports.
“Those responsible for this bloody clampdown on demonstrations must be held accountable for their actions,” Luther insisted.
But Iranian judiciary spokesperson Gholamhossein Esmaili told reporters that “the numbers and figures that are being given by hostile groups are utter lies, and the [official] statistics have serious differences with what they announced”.
However, in an apparent show of good will, Rouhani this week called for any unarmed and innocent people arrested during the protests to be freed.
“Religious and Islamic clemency should be shown and those innocent people who protested against petrol price hikes and were not armed ... should be released,” the president said in a televised speech.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Why more and more adults are reaching for soft toys
Under The Radar Does the popularity of the Squishmallow show Gen Z are 'scared to grow up'?
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Magazine solutions - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
Puzzles and Quizzes Issue - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
By The Week US Published
-
Magazine printables - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
Puzzles and Quizzes Issue - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
By The Week US Published
-
Why Assad fell so fast
The Explainer The newly liberated Syria is in an incredibly precarious position, but it's too soon to succumb to defeatist gloom
By The Week UK Published
-
Romania's election rerun
The Explainer Shock result of presidential election has been annulled following allegations of Russian interference
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Russia's shadow war in Europe
Talking Point Steering clear of open conflict, Moscow is slowly ratcheting up the pressure on Nato rivals to see what it can get away with.
By The Week UK Published
-
Cutting cables: the war being waged under the sea
In the Spotlight Two undersea cables were cut in the Baltic sea, sparking concern for the global network
By The Week UK Published
-
The nuclear threat: is Vladimir Putin bluffing?
Talking Point Kremlin's newest ballistic missile has some worried for Nato nations
By The Week UK Published
-
Russia vows retaliation for Ukrainian missile strikes
Speed Read Ukraine's forces have been using U.S.-supplied, long-range ATCMS missiles to hit Russia
By Arion McNicoll, The Week UK Published
-
Israel attacks Iran: a 'limited' retaliation
Talking Point Iran's humiliated leaders must decide how to respond to Netanyahu's measured strike
By The Week UK Published
-
Has the Taliban banned women from speaking?
Today's Big Question 'Rambling' message about 'bizarre' restriction joins series of recent decrees that amount to silencing of Afghanistan's women
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published