Is China’s slow response to blame for the coronavirus outbreak?
State led controls on information may have hampered efforts to curb spread of disease
The Chinese government was too slow to respond to the coronavirus, silencing doctors and potentially aiding its spread, according to reports.
The disease has now claimed over 300 lives worldwide, according to the BBC, including a man in the Philippines whose death was the first outside China.
More than 14,380 people have been infected, with some of the world’s leading experts now saying there are signs that a pandemic is imminent.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
“It’s very, very transmissible, and it almost certainly is going to be a pandemic,” Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, told The New York Times. “But will it be catastrophic? I don’t know.”
Did China respond too slowly?
According to The New York Times, “authorities silenced doctors and others for raising red flags” during the crucial seven weeks between the first symptoms of the virus in early December, and the government’s decision to lockdown Wuhan in January.
“They played down the dangers to the public, leaving the city’s 11m residents unaware they should protect themselves,” the paper reports.
Based on interviews with two dozen Wuhan residents, doctors and officials, on government statements and on Chinese media reports, the paper concludes that the Chinese goverment “delayed a concerted public health offensive”.
“By not moving aggressively to warn the public and medical professionals, public health experts say, the Chinese government lost one of its best chances to keep the disease from becoming an epidemic,” the paper reports.
According to Reuters, Chinese authorities also assured citizens in the days after the virus had first been identified that it was not widely transmissible.
This advice came despite “the lack of reliable data and testing capacity in Wuhan” and meant “city managers had little incentive to escalate problems to political superiors”, the news agency reports.
At the same time, the Chinese government also “censored negative online commentary about the situation, and arrested eight people it accused of being ‘rumour spreaders’”.
Why was the response delayed?
According to the Financial Times: “Part of the reason for the tightly controlled release of information was that Wuhan, a provincial capital, was hosting annual meetings of the top municipal and provincial officials from January 7 to 17.”
Dali Yang, an expert on Chinese bureaucracy at the University of Chicago, told the FT that the conference was a “major factor” in authorities attempts to “project an air of calm and most likely delayed taking action to stop the spread of the Wuhan coronavirus”.
“Local and central government officials are facing a growing wave of public anger over the handling of the new coronavirus,” reports The Guardian.
“On Sunday, state media reported that 337 party officials in Hubei had been ‘punished’, including six county-level officials who had been fired.”
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
William Gritten is a London-born, New York-based strategist and writer focusing on politics and international affairs.
-
The Week Unwrapped: Who will be the first trillionaire?
Podcast Plus, what has the Pope been doing in Asia? And why is ketamine addiction on the rise?
By The Week Staff Published
-
The week's best photos
In Pictures A pair of swans, a flooded street, and more
By Anahi Valenzuela, The Week US Published
-
Sam Leith picks his favourite children's books
The Week Recommends The author and journalist chooses works from Nicholas Fisk, Richard Adams and more
By The Week UK Published
-
A brief history of third parties in the US
In Depth Though none of America's third parties have won a presidential election, they have nonetheless had a large impact on the country's politics
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Chimpanzees are dying of human diseases
Under the radar Great apes are vulnerable to human pathogens thanks to genetic similarity, increased contact and no immunity
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Deaths of Jesse Baird and Luke Davies hang over Sydney's Mardi Gras
The Explainer Police officer, the former partner of TV presenter victim, charged with two counts of murder after turning himself in
By Austin Chen, The Week UK Published
-
Quiz of The Week: 24 February - 1 March
Puzzles and Quizzes Have you been paying attention to The Week's news?
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will mounting discontent affect Iran election?
Today's Big Question Low turnout is expected in poll seen as crucial test for Tehran's leadership
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Sweden clears final NATO hurdle with Hungary vote
Speed Read Hungary's parliament overwhelmingly approved Sweden's accession to NATO
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Modern royal scandals from around the world
The Explainer From Spain to the UAE, royal families have often been besieged by negative events
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
Zelenskyy says 31,000 troops dead in 2 years of war
Speed Read Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy gave a rare official military death toll
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published