With the US election just weeks away, Donald Trump appears to have a mountain to climb having trailed Joe Biden in nationwide polls for months.
But as many Hillary Clinton supporters learned in 2016, opinion polling is not always the best predictor of the election outcome.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What went wrong in 2016?
Contrary to the assessments of those who “swore off polls for ever” in the wake of the 2016 election, the polls were not necessarily wrong but misunderstood, The Times says.
US presidential elections are two-stage, state-by-state contests finalised through the Electoral College and do not directly represent the popular vote.
In almost all states, the candidate who has the highest vote total takes all the delegates for that state, and the candidate who seals a majority (270 or more) of the Electoral College wins the election.
As a result, it is possible for a candidate to win a plurality of votes but still lose the election, making opinion polling a less accurate predictor in tight races.
This is exactly what happened in 2016.
Pollster RealClearPolitics showed Clinton averaged a 3.2 percentage point lead over Trump across the US on the day of the election. She ended up winning the popular vote by 2.1 percentage points, “a 1.1 point difference that is within the margin of error for most polls”, Business Insider says.
But through a targeted campaign strategy, Trump took advantage of the Electoral College in a highly efficient way, converting just 46% of the popular vote into 56.5% of the Electoral College and taking the White House.
How does Biden’s lead compare?
Biden’s polling lead over Trump is significantly wider than Clinton’s ever was. Ahead of the first presidential debate on Tuesday, the ex-vice president held a seven-point advantage over Trump, increasing to eight after the showdown.
This is the largest polling lead at this point in an election cycle since former president Bill Clinton’s re-election in 1996, Newsweek reports.
And “even assuming that current national and state polls were as far off from the final result as they were in 2016”, Biden would “still win the Electoral College and five of the top six states analysts say are likely to decide the election”, Business Insider adds.
Can the polls be trusted?
This all depends on how we view them.
At a national level, polls show the number of people likely to vote for a candidate without taking into account the Electoral College. So any definitive predictions made using their figures run the risk of being incorrect.
It was an unusual year in 2016, in that a large number of voters remained undecided right up until polling day. This made predicting the outcome of the vote harder, the Pew Research Centre says.
That is not the case in 2020, where there is a smaller number of undecided voters than in most election years.
One thing worth taking into account, however, is the small number of major discrepancies in polling at state level in 2016. One example is Wisconsin, which Trump won by a margin of 0.7%, but which polls had Clinton leading by 6.5 points on average.
What happens if polls are wrong?
In 2016, incorrect polling predictions were surprising. In 2020, a similar outcome would be seismic.
“Only once in more than 80 years of polling” has a lead of the size that Biden now enjoys been overturned by election day, The Article reports. This was in 1948, when President Truman came from behind to defeat Thomas Dewey.
“So can we be certain that Trump will lose?” The Article asks. “No: but if he wins he will have achieved something that no candidate has managed for 72 years.”
-
El Paso airspace closure tied to FAA-Pentagon standoffSpeed Read The closure in the Texas border city stemmed from disagreements between the Federal Aviation Administration and Pentagon officials over drone-related tests
-
Political cartoons for February 12Cartoons Thursday's political cartoons include a Pam Bondi performance, Ghislaine Maxwell on tour, and ICE detention facilities
-
Arcadia: Tom Stoppard’s ‘masterpiece’ makes a ‘triumphant’ returnThe Week Recommends Carrie Cracknell’s revival at the Old Vic ‘grips like a thriller’
-
How corrupt is the UK?The Explainer Decline in standards ‘risks becoming a defining feature of our political culture’ as Britain falls to lowest ever score on global index
-
US to send 200 troops to Nigeria to train armySpeed Read Trump has accused the West African government of failing to protect Christians from terrorist attacks
-
Grand jury rejects charging 6 Democrats for ‘orders’ videoSpeed Read The jury refused to indict Democratic lawmakers for a video in which they urged military members to resist illegal orders
-
Trump links funding to name on Penn StationSpeed Read Trump “can restart the funding with a snap of his fingers,” a Schumer insider said
-
Trump reclassifies 50,000 federal jobs to ease firingsSpeed Read The rule strips longstanding job protections from federal workers
-
Is the Gaza peace plan destined to fail?Today’s Big Question Since the ceasefire agreement in October, the situation in Gaza is still ‘precarious’, with the path to peace facing ‘many obstacles’
-
Vietnam’s ‘balancing act’ with the US, China and EuropeIn the Spotlight Despite decades of ‘steadily improving relations’, Hanoi is still ‘deeply suspicious’ of the US as it tries to ‘diversify’ its options
-
Trump demands $1B from Harvard, deepening feudSpeed Read Trump has continually gone after the university during his second term
