The Church of England General Synod has taken "a step towards gay marriage" in churches, the Daily Telegraph reports.
Members voted against a bishops' report saying marriage in church should only be between a man and a woman and services should not be held to bless same-sex relationships.
The report had been criticised by equality campaigners, who said the church was also adopting a "don't ask, don't tell" policy on gay clergy – a reference to the former US military policy.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What did the report say?
Marriage and Same Sex Relationships after the Shared Conversations suggests new teachings on marriage and relationships should be drawn up to replace those introduced in the 1990s. While rejecting the idea of changing policy on same-sex relationships, it says the new teachings should provide "maximum freedom" for gay couples and clergy.
What was the reaction?
Members of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and intersex (LGBTI) community had expressed anger that, after engaging in three years of so-called "shared conversations", the bishops had decided not to recommend any change to church practice. Campaigner Peter Tatchell welcomed the synod's rejection of the report and called it a "victory for love and equality".
He added: "The bishops' report treats LGBTI clergy and laity as second class, both within the church and the wider society."
What was said last night?
Many bishops struck a conflicted or conciliatory tone. The Bishop of Willesden, the Rt Rev Pete Broadbent, said he did not want to "attempt an exercise in self-justification".
The Bishop of Norwich, Graham James, said he regretted any "pain or anger" the report may have caused.
-
Who owns Gaza? Israel's occupation plansThe Explainer Egypt, Israel and Britain have ruled the beleaguered territory
-
Savages: a tragi-comedy set in a 'quirky handcrafted world'The Week Recommends This new animated film by Oscar-nominated filmmaker Claude Barras is undeniably political, but it has a hopeful message
-
Why 'faceless bots' are interviewing job huntersIn The Spotlight Artificial intelligence is taking over a crucial part of recruitment
-
How China uses 'dark fleets' to circumvent trade sanctionsThe Explainer The fleets are used to smuggle goods like oil and fish
-
One year after mass protests, why are Kenyans taking to the streets again?today's big question More than 60 protesters died during demonstrations in 2024
-
What happens if tensions between India and Pakistan boil over?TODAY'S BIG QUESTION As the two nuclear-armed neighbors rattle their sabers in the wake of a terrorist attack on the contested Kashmir region, experts worry that the worst might be yet to come
-
Why Russia removed the Taliban's terrorist designationThe Explainer Russia had designated the Taliban as a terrorist group over 20 years ago
-
Inside the Israel-Turkey geopolitical dance across SyriaTHE EXPLAINER As Syria struggles in the wake of the Assad regime's collapse, its neighbors are carefully coordinating to avoid potential military confrontations
-
'Like a sound from hell': Serbia and sonic weaponsThe Explainer Half a million people sign petition alleging Serbian police used an illegal 'sound cannon' to disrupt anti-government protests
-
The arrest of the Philippines' former president leaves the country's drug war in disarrayIn the Spotlight Rodrigo Duterte was arrested by the ICC earlier this month
-
Ukrainian election: who could replace Zelenskyy?The Explainer Donald Trump's 'dictator' jibe raises pressure on Ukraine to the polls while the country is under martial law
