Facebook denies censoring conservative topics
Social giant accused of manipulating its 'Trending' news sidebar to remove right-wing stories
Facebook has denied censoring its "Trending" news sidebar after a former employee claimed the social media giant would routinely suppress stories of interest to right-wing users.
The ex-worker, a journalist employed to develop the "highly-influential" section, told Gizmodo staff would prevent stories about conservative figures and events from appearing despite trending organically among the site's users.
"I'd come on shift and I'd discover that CPAC [the Conservative Political Action Conference] or Mitt Romney or Glenn Beck or popular conservative topics wouldn't be trending because either the curator didn't recognize the news topic or it was like they had a bias against Ted Cruz", said the source.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Gizmodo also claimed that news curators were encouraged to artificially float articles in the section, either to pick up stories dominating the front pages or to promote topics "deemed important for making the network look like a place where people talked about hard news".
The report comes just weeks after Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg appeared to publicly denounce presumptive Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump during a developer conference.
The Guardian says the report has caused a "firestorm in conservative media circles", with prominent US conservative mouthpiece Breitbart saying it confirmed what conservatives had "long suspected".
In a statement, Facebook denied supressing conservative viewpoints and topics and said the site was a "platform for people and perspectives from across the political spectrum".
It also explained the system behind the feature, saying such censorship was "technically not feasible" as the tools used by reviewers do not allow them to discriminate against sources of particular "ideological origin".
"Popular topics are first surfaced by an algorithm, then audited by review team members to confirm that the topics are in fact trending news in the real world and not, for example, similar-sounding topics or misnomers," wrote Tom Stocky, who leads the section.
As the BBC explains, the list is "edited by humans so as to avoid regularly recurring topics – such as 'Lunch'".
Facebook also rejected claims that news stories such as the Black Lives Matter movement were artificially ranked: "We do not insert stories artificially into trending topics, and do not instruct our reviewers to do so," said Stocky.
He added: "We have in place strict guidelines for our trending topic reviewers as they audit topics surfaced algorithmically. At the same time, our reviewers' actions are logged and reviewed, and violating our guidelines is a fireable offense."
Ironically, Gizmodo's original story began trending on Facebook's trending topics section on Monday.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Drugmakers paid pharmacy benefit managers to avoid restricting opioid prescriptions
Under the radar The middlemen and gatekeepers of insurance coverage have been pocketing money in exchange for working with Big Pharma
By Theara Coleman, The Week US Published
-
The week's best photos
In Pictures A cyclone's aftermath, a fearless leap, and more
By Anahi Valenzuela, The Week US Published
-
The Imaginary Institution of India: a 'compelling' exhibition
The Week Recommends 'Vibrant' show at the Barbican examines how political upheaval stimulated Indian art
By The Week UK Published
-
Is the AI bubble deflating?
Today's Big Question Growing skepticism and high costs prompt reconsideration
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
How social media is limiting political content
The Explainer Critics say Meta's 'extraordinary move' to have less politics in users' feeds could be 'actively muzzling civic action'
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Twitter's year of Elon Musk: what happens next?
In the Spotlight 'Your platform is dying', says one commentator, but new CEO is aiming for profitability next year
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Turns out Facebook isn't as polarizing as previously thought
Talking Point New studies show that, contrary to prior belief, the algorithm has little effect on driving polarization
By Theara Coleman Published
-
Threads: will privacy fears scupper Meta’s Twitter ‘killer’?
Under the Radar Mark Zuckerberg’s new Threads app has launched but data protection rules mean it isn’t yet available in the EU
By Keumars Afifi-Sabet Published
-
Mark Zuckerberg vs. Elon Musk: a tale of the tech tape
Under the Radar The two men challenged each other to a fight after years of sniping
By Justin Klawans Published
-
How greater online regulation is prompting fears of a ‘splinternet’
feature Government pressure worldwide means the internet is not as open as it once was
By Sorcha Bradley Published
-
Donald Trump, the Pope and the disruptive power of AI images
feature AI-generated deepfakes blur reality and could be used for political disinformation or personal blackmail
By The Week Staff Published