Impeach Mark Sanford?
South Carolina's governor not only went AWOL for a foreign tryst, he's also accused of 37 ethics violations. Is it time for impeachment?
South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford (R) was charged with 37 counts of breaking state ethics laws, including using state aircraft for personal trips, flying first class on the taxpayers’ dime, and illegal use of campaign funds. The GOP-controlled state legislature is now considering impeaching Sanford before his term ends in January 2011, for the ethics violations and/or going AWOL for five days to visit his mistress in Argentina. Is impeachment really the right response? (Watch MSNBC discuss the Sanford case.)
Impeach the lame duck: Sanford’s lawyers call the infractions “minor and technical,” says South Carolina’s Pee Dee Morning News in an editorial, “but they’re enough to merit impeachment hearings in January, in our opinion.” That would give Sanford a chance to clear his name, and Sanford’s opponents a stage from which to publicly expose his lack of ethics, judgment, and respect for the law.
“Gov. Sanford’s actions have been damaging”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Impeachment is not the answer: “Moral outrage” is not a proper basis for impeachment, says the Anderson, S.C., Independent Mail in an editorial. If the House finds “legitimate and legal reasons” to impeach Sanford, rather than just “indignation over his infidelity,” we might change our mind. But otherwise, let’s spare South Carolina “yet another public embarrassment.”
“What’s next in the Sanford Saga?”
It’s not worth the effort: You’d think Democrats at least would want Sanford impeached, says Jamie Sanderson at Daily Kos. But despite “how nice it would feel,” it wouldn’t be good for the state, or even the party. Another Republican is in line to replace Sanford, and it seems like a waste of time and energy to kick out a “worthless politician who has already sealed his fate,” when South Carolina has much more pressing problems.
“Let’s talk about this Sanford mess, shall we?”
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Sanford should resign: If Sanford had any sense of shame or decency, says Jo-Ann Armao in The Washington Post, he’d “spare himself, his family, and his state further agony” by resigning immediately. But maybe that’s too much to expect of “a man who thinks nothing of leaving his four sons over Father's Day to travel to another time zone for a tryst with his mistress.”
“Where is Sanford’s shame?”
-
Palestine's newly freed political prisoners
The Explainer Terrorists, women and children have been released in the latest phase of the ceasefire prisoner swap
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
The resurgence of the Taliban in Pakistan
Under the Radar Islamabad blames Kabul for sheltering jihadi fighters terrorising Pakistan's borderlands
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Quiz of The Week: 25 - 31 January
Have you been paying attention to The Week's news?
By The Week Staff Published