Saudi Arabia just trolled the global oil market
Here's why OPEC's decision to cut oil prices wasn't serious
Will Russia, Qatar, Venezuela, and Saudi Arabia finally have mercy on the global oil industry?
That was the question raised on Monday, when the four countries announced a tentative deal to freeze their oil output — pursuant to a few as yet unmet conditions, of course.
Up through mid-2014, the price of oil had been cruising along at about $110 per barrel. But problems were brewing: The slowdown in the global economy was cutting demand for oil in China and other developing markets. Meanwhile, the boom in North American shale oil production was driving up supply. And that's not the sort of thing companies can just flip off like a switch: The costs of paying off loans or of maintaining major projects like deepwater drilling can force companies to keep pumping to cover these expenses even when oil prices plunge.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Finally, the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) — which includes Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Venezuela, and keeps in dialogue with Russia — made an unusual decision. Instead of cutting production to bring supply more in line with demand, they decided to keep boosting production — the explicit point being to drive down the price and knock competitors out of business so they could corner more of the global oil market.
By the end of 2013 supply overtook demand and the global industry began building up big stockpiles of unused oil. Around mid-2014, the financial markets could no longer bridge the gap to sustain prices. The cost of a barrel of oil dropped like a rock, reducing itself by almost two-thirds. It's now bouncing around between $30 and $35 per barrel — the lowest it's been in a decade.
This brings us to the problems with the new deal proposed by Saudi Arabia & Co.
First off, the proposition is to freeze oil production at its January levels. They'd keep pumping, they just wouldn't increase the rate at which they're pumping. But industry experts weren't really expecting Russia, Qatar, and Venezuela to increase production much anyway, since they're already pumping about as fast as their infrastructures can manage.
As it stands, OPEC pumped a whopping 32.3 million barrels per day (mb/d) in January. Simply freezing at that rate isn't going to help much, as these December projections from the International Energy Agency (IEA) show:
(Graph from the International Energy Agency's December 2015 Oil Market Report)
The IEA actually assumed a slightly lower rate of OPEC output than what the international group pumped in January, and their projections still show supply (the green line) outpacing demand (the yellow line) at least through the end of 2016's third quarter. This means increases in oil stockpiles (the blue bars, measured on the right axis) will keep happening every quarter. But what's needed is for demand to overtake supply again, so that those blue bars can go negative again and the global industry can draw down the glut of oil stockpiles it's already built up.
"The market does not need a freeze. It needs a reduction," Michael Lynch, president of Strategic Energy and Economic Research in Massachusetts, told The New York Times. "They are not offering anything like that."
This isn't too surprising: Several OPEC nations, such as Saudi Arabia and Venezuela, are so thoroughly dependent on oil to fund their governments and power their economies that they can't really afford to stop pumping regardless of the price.
There are other wrinkles, too. The deal only holds "if other producers join this initiative," according to the Russian Energy Ministry. And neither Iran nor Iraq — both OPEC members — were among the initial four floating the idea.
Iraq is also already pumping about as fast as it can. And Iran is looking to ramp up: Its oil production was already slumping when sanctions were imposed on its exports in 2012. That drove Iranian production even lower, and it hasn't recovered since. Thanks to the nuclear deal, the sanctions were lifted last month, and Iran has made it clear they want to return to their pre-sanction rates of oil production. (IEA's projections assumed a ramp up in Iranian production as well.)
In short, even if the deal goes through, the main thing it might head off is an extra 0.73 mb/d from Iran. And that's nowhere close to what's needed to stabilize the price of oil. And the deal probably won't go through anyway, unless Saudi Arabia, Russia, Qatar, and Venezuela can convince Iran to swallow its pride.
At this point, the deal doesn't look like much more than Saudi Arabia & Co. trolling the global oil market.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Jeff Spross was the economics and business correspondent at TheWeek.com. He was previously a reporter at ThinkProgress.
-
'Make legal immigration a more plausible option'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
LA-to-Las Vegas high-speed rail line breaks ground
Speed Read The railway will be ready as soon as 2028
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Israel's military intelligence chief resigns
Speed Read Maj. Gen. Aharon Haliva is the first leader to quit for failing to prevent the Hamas attack in October
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
Geopolitics and the economy in 2024
Talking Point The West is banking on a year of falling inflation. Don't rule out a shock
By The Week UK Published
-
US-led price cap on Russian oil 'almost completely circumvented'
Speed Read 'Almost none' of seaborne crude oil from Moscow stayed below $60 per barrel limit imposed by G7 and EU last year
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Mexico's Sinaloa cartel bans fentanyl, reportedly under pain of death
Speed Read The top exporter of fentanyl to the U.S. is apparently looking to diversify as law enforcement turns up the heat
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The threat posed by bonds to the global financial system
Under The Radar The worst bear market in a century is unleashing huge strain on parts of the financial system
By The Week Staff Published
-
China: a superpower’s slump
The Explainer After 40 years of explosive growth, China’s economy is now in deep distress — with no turnaround in sight
By The Week Staff Published
-
Are Western sanctions working on Russia’s growing economy?
Today's Big Question IMF forecasts Russian growth but one expert says the West must be patient in bid to deter Putin
By Arion McNicoll Published
-
South Africa’s energy crisis explained
feature Electricity blackouts lead to rising crime and economic hardship and add to pressure on ANC
By The Week Staff Published
-
India’s geopolitical aspirations in 2023
feature The emerging Asian superpower is showing ‘growing confidence’ on the world stage
By Chas Newkey-Burden Published