How Trump can keep from getting swindled by Kim Jong Un
7 things the president must do before his high-stakes summit with the North Korean dictator
What a difference a few months makes. Back at the end of 2017, it looked like the United States and North Korea were on a collision course for war. Then Kim Jong Un swerved.
The North Korean leader has finally decided to try diplomacy. Thanks to a combination of external sanctions pressure, the fear of a military strike by the U.S., and the North's ability to relegate its nuclear and missile research to the lab, Kim has opted to return to a time-tested playbook: the offering of an old-school great power summit to end this nuclear standoff once and for all.
Provided Pyongyang is sincere, what happens next will determine if there truly will be war or peace in northeast Asia. A successful summit between Kim and President Trump could set the stage for the denuclearization of North Korea. But a failed meeting would create tremendous pressures on both sides. North Korea would likely go back to missile and nuclear testing while America and its allies could increase sanctions further. This could force Kim to perhaps conduct an atmospheric test that pushes Washington to then respond with deadly military force.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Therefore, the Trump administration must not only lay the groundwork for testing Kim’s intentions, but set up very clear diplomatic redlines and conditions that Pyongyang must meet.
Indeed, such conditionality should not be controversial. Considering the stakes involved, both sides must be sure they can enter the meeting with much of the outcome already guaranteed. The worst mistake of all would be for the Trump administration, or even the North Koreans, to think two men who do not know each other, who have very different backgrounds and no mutual trust can hammer out a deal to denuclearize the so-called Hermit Kingdom in just a few hours or a day.
So here are a set of reasonable conditions that Team Trump should demand of the Kim regime for talks to happen. These will not only flush out their intentions, but make it clear the Trump administration means business about denuclearization.
1. First and foremost, the administration needs to be able to have a clear line of communication to North Korea. That means no more messages through Seoul. While South Korea is clearly acting as a bridge to the North and should be thanked for their efforts, it's time for Washington and Pyongyang to directly communicate important ideas. This is key to avoid misunderstandings. It's also especially important now that North Korea itself has not confirmed directly, at least according to all available press reports, that it has accepted a meeting with President Trump.
2. Next, the location of the meeting must be decided on carefully so no one side gets an optics advantage. That means the meeting can’t be held in Pyongyang or anywhere in North Korea. Even if the talks failed, Kim could use the image of a handshake with President Trump on his home turf as a show of strength to his people, further solidifying his hold on power. Having the meeting in China won’t work because it's a North Korean ally. Japan wouldn't work because it's a U.S. ally. Some neutral nation would also be problematic because of the logistic and security challenges. There is, however, a perfect location: the Demilitarized Zone. There, both sides would get no advantage in locale. Plus, with some of the world’s most powerful armed forces staring at each other, the entire world would see the gravity of the situation — and why a deal must be struck.
3. North Korea must release all three U.S. citizens it has held captive. There is no way Pyongyang can hold this type of leverage over Washington and expect talks to be conducted in good faith.
4. Kim must continue to hold back any nuclear or missile testing while talks are underway. While this has already been agreed to, there is a potential loophole North Korea could try to exploit: claiming to conduct a satellite test that would allow Kim to perfect his ICBM technology — something the regime has done before. Washington must make it clear that any launch of a missile or rocket — no matter the purpose — would nullify any hope of talks.
5. Pyongyang cannot demand the ending of any joint U.S.-South Korea military exercises, either diplomatically or in its propaganda outlets. This is a condition Washington has been firm on, and it must hold the line. We must remember North Korea has drilled its forces all winter long and it's the right of any sovereign nation to make sure its military is a trained, fighting force. Washington and Seoul should be afforded the same right.
6. There should also be no letup of the maximum pressure campaign before or while talks are ongoing. That means no sanctions relief of any kind from any nation. Also, no resumption of North-South Korea joint industrial park efforts will be considered before a nuclear deal is struck. We must not repeat the mistakes of the past, and give North Korea even a cent for talking. Pyongyang would just do what it always does: pocket the concessions, stall talks for months or years, and develop even better missiles and nuclear bombs.
7. Perhaps the most important thing Team Trump must keep in mind is what it hopes this gathering will set in motion: North Korea's eventual forfeiture of its nuclear weapons and missile programs. To get there, Team Trump must demand of Pyongyang at least some outline of what denuclearization means to them and what a roadmap towards that goal looks like. If North Korea can present such a plan, Washington and its allies would offer to slowly roll back sanctions in a reciprocal fashion. For example, if North Korea destroys 10 percent of its nuclear weapons and missile arsenals, Washington and its allies would remove 10 percent of its sanctions.
This is a key point, as in the past, North Korea has demanded a guarantee of its security in exchange for the ceding of its nukes. That can mean anything. For example, the Kim regime has demanded in the past everything from the ending of the U.S.-South Korea alliance and the removal of all U.S. forces from the peninsula to Washington also giving up its nukes. As you can imagine, all of that would be a non-starter, as such moves would be unacceptable to our allies and most likely the American people.
Clearly, we are at the start of a very delicate diplomatic dance where many things could go wrong, endangering and perhaps derailing any chance of a historic meeting. However, the worst thing that could happen would be for President Trump to meet with Kim Jong Un with no preconditions set and no guaranteed deliverables. If that occurred, the chances of failure would be astronomically high, setting the stage for the ultimate nuclear showdown.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Harry J. Kazianis is director of defense studies at the Center for the National Interest, founded by former U.S. President Richard M. Nixon.
-
Can AI tools be used to Hollywood's advantage?
Talking Points It makes some aspects of the industry faster and cheaper. It will also put many people in the entertainment world out of work
By Anya Jaremko-Greenwold, The Week US Published
-
'Paraguay has found itself in a key position'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
Meet Youngmi Mayer, the renegade comedian whose frank new memoir is a blitzkrieg to the genre
The Week Recommends 'I'm Laughing Because I'm Crying' details a biracial life on the margins, with humor as salving grace
By Scott Hocker, The Week US Published
-
Has the Taliban banned women from speaking?
Today's Big Question 'Rambling' message about 'bizarre' restriction joins series of recent decrees that amount to silencing of Afghanistan's women
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Cuba's energy crisis
The Explainer Already beset by a host of issues, the island nation is struggling with nationwide blackouts
By Rebekah Evans, The Week UK Published
-
Putin's fixation with shamans
Under the Radar Secretive Russian leader, said to be fascinated with occult and pagan rituals, allegedly asked for blessing over nuclear weapons
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Chimpanzees are dying of human diseases
Under the radar Great apes are vulnerable to human pathogens thanks to genetic similarity, increased contact and no immunity
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Deaths of Jesse Baird and Luke Davies hang over Sydney's Mardi Gras
The Explainer Police officer, the former partner of TV presenter victim, charged with two counts of murder after turning himself in
By Austin Chen, The Week UK Published
-
Quiz of The Week: 24 February - 1 March
Puzzles and Quizzes Have you been paying attention to The Week's news?
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will mounting discontent affect Iran election?
Today's Big Question Low turnout is expected in poll seen as crucial test for Tehran's leadership
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Sweden clears final NATO hurdle with Hungary vote
Speed Read Hungary's parliament overwhelmingly approved Sweden's accession to NATO
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published