The mundane badness of Trump and Putin
There is no Trump-Putin supervillain scandal. Here on Earth, bad people are bad in humbler, less exciting ways.
Politics makes strange bedfellows, and no public menage in our time is odder than the one in which liberals have united with far-right online LARPers in pretending that both President Trump and Russia's Vladimir Putin are ferocious reactionaries.
There is nothing reactionary or particularly supervillainous about Putin or his regime. Far from being a kind of theocratic neo-tsar who seeks to revive the glorious dream of the Rus' in the hearts of his post-Soviet countrymen and bring the decadent neoliberal West to heel, he is actually a cheap grifter, the head of an international mafia of oilmen and mineral tycoons who starve their fellow citizens in order to purchase luxury condos in the various major cities of Western Europe. Instead of serving as the secular enforcer of the spiritual authority of the Russian Orthodox Church, this divorcé has reduced the venerable Moscow patriarchate to a shabby front organization for Russian intelligence. His foreign policy is aggressive, but this has nothing whatever to do with Putin's allegedly right-wing attitudes and everything to do with the consistent policy of the Soviet Union throughout the last century. If the man at the Kremlin is a reactionary, so was Stalin.
The same is true of President Trump. For years now he has occasioned the most far-flung and lunatic speculation about his views on abortion and even contraception and extramarital sex. How anyone can believe that this twice-divorced, serially philandering, porn star-boinking, philistine manwhore, the only living head of state (to my knowledge anyway) who has appeared in a commercially distributed pornographic video, cares a fig about the Christian virtue of chastity is beyond me. Probably the same absurd things would be insisted upon no matter what Republican was in the White House, but there have to be limits even to exaggeration.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
At least it is easier to make sense of the caricature of Trump as a kind of Buchananite populist who has broken with the post-1989 neoliberal consensus and wishes to replace it with some kind of quasi-Falangist economic nationalism. But this, too, is absolute nonsense. Trump's views on trade are barely more radical than those of Ronald Reagan and totally in line with those of Senator (though not of course President) Barack Obama. His economic policy has come straight from the GOP playbook: lowering taxes, increasing GDP without regard for wages or other even less tangible factors such as the dignity of work, and boosting the Dow Jones Industrial Average to unsustainable highs. Love or hate all of this, it's painfully ordinary Republican stuff.
None of this has prevented cynical politicians and their counterparts in journalism or, on the other hand, a pseudonymous army of post-teenaged Xbox players with Twitter usernames like @constantinoplevictory343, from living out their dark fantasies of a world on the cusp of a return to the Middle Ages. It is easy to understand why the latter group likes to indulge in these games. It is simply an extension of what they are doing with the rest of their time. But everyone else? Perhaps the answer is that in an age in which wealth and leisure are, for a certain class, world-historically abundant and entertainment is a ubiquitous feature of life, all politics has become a form of role-playing.
I am not immune to this temptation. Part of me wishes that I could believe for even a moment that Trump is a Butlerian jihadist intent on ushering in a world or even universe-wide Dark Age with the power of the American sword. Such a fantastically remote contingency would be, at any rate, less boring than the normal business of government, with its perennial mind-numbing debates about rather boring, straightforward subjects, like the best means of providing American citizens with health care.
Trump isn't a reactionary of any kind, and neither is Putin. The content of their summit, which is taking place amid the announcement that 12 Russian intelligence officials have been indicted by Special Counsel Robert Mueller in the course of his investigation of the 2016 election, will not be the horror of abortion or the evils of dog yoga or Trump's next directives as a Putin-controlled Manchurian candidate or even the downside to globalized free trade, but the same things that American and Russian leaders have discussed for years: the manifold tensions between the de facto head of NATO and the successor of the communist dictators whom the last century's longest lasting alliance was designed to overthrow and their numerous consequences, among them the hacking of the Democratic National Committee's emails.
None of this should be taken to suggest that these men are not bad or dangerous. But the real world is not a lame Hulu show or your favorite role-playing game. Here bad people are bad in humbler, less exciting ways.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Matthew Walther is a national correspondent at The Week. His work has also appeared in First Things, The Spectator of London, The Catholic Herald, National Review, and other publications. He is currently writing a biography of the Rev. Montague Summers. He is also a Robert Novak Journalism Fellow.
-
Ukraine hints at end to 'hot war' with Russia in 2025
Talking Points Could the new year see an end to the worst European violence of the 21st Century?
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
What does the FDIC do?
In the Spotlight Deposit insurance builds confidence in the banking system
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
2024: The year of conspiracy theories
IN THE SPOTLIGHT Global strife and domestic electoral tensions made this year a bonanza for outlandish worldviews and self-justifying explanations
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Why Assad fell so fast
The Explainer The newly liberated Syria is in an incredibly precarious position, but it's too soon to succumb to defeatist gloom
By The Week UK Published
-
Romania's election rerun
The Explainer Shock result of presidential election has been annulled following allegations of Russian interference
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Russia's shadow war in Europe
Talking Point Steering clear of open conflict, Moscow is slowly ratcheting up the pressure on Nato rivals to see what it can get away with.
By The Week UK Published
-
Cutting cables: the war being waged under the sea
In the Spotlight Two undersea cables were cut in the Baltic sea, sparking concern for the global network
By The Week UK Published
-
The nuclear threat: is Vladimir Putin bluffing?
Talking Point Kremlin's newest ballistic missile has some worried for Nato nations
By The Week UK Published
-
Russia vows retaliation for Ukrainian missile strikes
Speed Read Ukraine's forces have been using U.S.-supplied, long-range ATCMS missiles to hit Russia
By Arion McNicoll, The Week UK Published
-
Has the Taliban banned women from speaking?
Today's Big Question 'Rambling' message about 'bizarre' restriction joins series of recent decrees that amount to silencing of Afghanistan's women
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Cuba's energy crisis
The Explainer Already beset by a host of issues, the island nation is struggling with nationwide blackouts
By Rebekah Evans, The Week UK Published