The Supreme Court will consider an appeal that could block the Environmental Protection Agency from restricting greenhouse gas output from power plants, reports Bloomberg.
The court will hear from coal mining companies and Republican-led states that want to pare back the EPA's authority to curb emissions. Depending how the court rules, President Biden's administration could be prevented from enacting climate change measures working toward its pledge to reduce U.S. emissions in half by the end of this decade.
As Bloomberg writes, critics have argued the EPA has overstepped its bounds in establishing new rules around greenhouse gas emissions. Even so, the decision by the Supreme Court to hear the appeal came as a "big surprise," Jeff Holmstead, a former EPA assistant administrator, told Bloomberg. The ruling will have "massive consequences," predicted a West Virginia-led group of 18 states, and could force "dramatic changes" in the regulation and production of U.S. energy.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
A ruling in favor of the mining companies would not only keep the EPA from regulating emissions, but would also block Congress from delegating that power to the agency, writes the University of Texas School of Law's Steve Vladeck. In the wake of the court's decision to take this case, energy reporter David Roberts predicted "SCOTUS [will] gut EPA authority" in several ways over the next few years. "It will radically constrain Biden's ability to reduce carbon," wrote Roberts, and "there's nothing he (or we) can do about it." In similarly dire terms, Reason's Jonathan Adler wrote: "Whichever way the Court goes, this will undoubtedly be the most important environmental law case on the Court's docket this term, and could well become one of the most significant environmental law cases of all time."
EPA Administrator Michael Regan said the administration is "very optimistic that EPA does have the appropriate statutory authority to reduce CO2 emissions from coal plants." Read more at Bloomberg.
-
September 14 editorial cartoonsCartoons Sunday’s political cartoons include RFK Jr on the hook, the destruction of discourse, and more
-
Air strikes in the Caribbean: Trump’s murky narco-warTalking Point Drug cartels ‘don’t follow Marquess of Queensberry Rules’, but US military air strikes on speedboats rely on strained interpretation of ‘invasion’
-
A tour of Sri Lanka’s beautiful northThe Week Recommends ‘Less frenetic’ than the south, this region is full of beautiful wildlife, historical sites and resorts
-
Canyons under the Antarctic have deep impactsUnder the radar Submarine canyons could be affecting the climate more than previously thought
-
SpaceX breaks Starship losing streak in 10th testspeed read The Starship rocket's test flight was largely successful, deploying eight dummy satellites during its hour in space
-
NASA is moving away from tracking climate changeThe Explainer Climate missions could be going dark
-
Rabbits with 'horns' sighted across Coloradospeed read These creatures are infected with the 'mostly harmless' Shope papilloma virus
-
Lithium shows promise in Alzheimer's studySpeed Read Potential new treatments could use small amounts of the common metal
-
Scientists discover cause of massive sea star die-offSpeed Read A bacteria related to cholera has been found responsible for the deaths of more than 5 billion sea stars
-
'Thriving' ecosystem found 30,000 feet underseaSpeed Read Researchers discovered communities of creatures living in frigid, pitch-black waters under high pressure
-
What would happen to Earth if humans went extinct?The Explainer Human extinction could potentially give rise to new species and climates
