The FDA has been timid on COVID tests. It should have been bold.
One of the more aggravating aspects of the Omicron surge is that the country needs lots and lots of COVID tests, preferably cheap, but getting them is difficult. It's easier to slow the spread of a virus — or to safely visit family at the holidays — if you know who has the bug and who doesn't. But nearly two years into the pandemic, achieving that simple goal in America is still elusive. (In Europe, testing kits are relatively cheap and easy to obtain.)
The problem seems to be at the FDA. ProPublica reported last month that companies trying to develop rapid COVID tests have encountered an "arbitrary, opaque process" which takes so long to complete that one agency scientist quit in frustration earlier this year. One company was ready to roll out a product in March 2020, right as the pandemic was getting under way, but approval never came.
"You could have antigen tests saving lives since the beginning of the pandemic," said MIT's Irene Bosch, who developed that test. "That's the sad story."
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
All of this ought to raise an uncomfortable question for Democrats: Are conservatives right that America's regulatory processes are too much?
Republicans have long been obsessed with deregulation, and in particular they have argued the FDA's approval processes prevent new life-saving treatments from getting to the people who need them. The party has acted accordingly: Then-President Donald Trump signed a federal "right to try" law in 2018 that lets sick patients try experimental drugs. His administration also raised alarms earlier this year when it tried to jam through last-minute directives to reduce the agency's oversight of new drugs and medical devices. The FDA's defenders say its processes try to balance speed and the need to deliver safe, effective care — and present themselves as defenders of the scientific process.
Maybe that's the intent, but the ongoing dearth of cheap and plentiful COVID tests suggests the balance is out of whack. The FDA has been timid where it ought to be bold. And it suggests that Republicans have had a point. Regulations exist to protect Americans from harm, whether that be through illness, injury, or some other cause. In the case of COVID testing, though, the FDA's processes have arguably created more problems than they have prevented.
As the party of Big Government — and as the party currently in charge — Democrats must fix this testing mess. The answer isn't to merely eliminate safety rules and leave Americans at the mercy of the markets, but to make the process more flexible and ready to act in emergencies. It's time to make the system work. Two years is too long to wait for COVID tests.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Joel Mathis is a freelance writer who has spent nine years as a syndicated columnist, co-writing the RedBlueAmerica column as the liberal half of a point-counterpoint duo. His work also regularly appears in National Geographic, The Kansas City Star and Heatmap News. His awards include best online commentary at the Online News Association and (twice) at the City and Regional Magazine Association.
-
The new powers to stop stalking in the UK
The Explainer Updated guidance could help protect more victims, but public is losing trust in police and battered criminal justice system
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Criminal trail?'
Today's Newspapers A roundup of the headlines from the US front pages
By The Week Staff Published
-
Grindr 'shared user HIV status' with ad firms, lawsuit claims
Speed Read LGBTQ dating app accused of breaching UK data protection laws in case filed at London's High Court
By Rebecca Messina, The Week UK Published
-
Is the Supreme Court about to criminalize homelessness?
Talking Points The court will decide if bans on outdoor camping are 'cruel and unusual'
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Myanmar: the Spring Revolution and the downfall of the generals
Talking Point An armed protest movement has swept across the country since the elected government of Aung San Suu Kyi was overthrown in 2021
By The Week Staff Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Less than total recall
Editor's Letter Why our brains want to forget the darkest days of the pandemic
By Theunis Bates Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
'A wonky bureaucratic tweak has dramatically changed how Americans drive'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
It's not really about Biden's brain — unless it is
Talking Points Depending on who you ask, the renewed focus on the president's mental acuity is an election-year distraction, a legitimate point of concern, and sometimes both
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published