The FDA has been timid on COVID tests. It should have been bold.
One of the more aggravating aspects of the Omicron surge is that the country needs lots and lots of COVID tests, preferably cheap, but getting them is difficult. It's easier to slow the spread of a virus — or to safely visit family at the holidays — if you know who has the bug and who doesn't. But nearly two years into the pandemic, achieving that simple goal in America is still elusive. (In Europe, testing kits are relatively cheap and easy to obtain.)
The problem seems to be at the FDA. ProPublica reported last month that companies trying to develop rapid COVID tests have encountered an "arbitrary, opaque process" which takes so long to complete that one agency scientist quit in frustration earlier this year. One company was ready to roll out a product in March 2020, right as the pandemic was getting under way, but approval never came.
"You could have antigen tests saving lives since the beginning of the pandemic," said MIT's Irene Bosch, who developed that test. "That's the sad story."
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
All of this ought to raise an uncomfortable question for Democrats: Are conservatives right that America's regulatory processes are too much?
Republicans have long been obsessed with deregulation, and in particular they have argued the FDA's approval processes prevent new life-saving treatments from getting to the people who need them. The party has acted accordingly: Then-President Donald Trump signed a federal "right to try" law in 2018 that lets sick patients try experimental drugs. His administration also raised alarms earlier this year when it tried to jam through last-minute directives to reduce the agency's oversight of new drugs and medical devices. The FDA's defenders say its processes try to balance speed and the need to deliver safe, effective care — and present themselves as defenders of the scientific process.
Maybe that's the intent, but the ongoing dearth of cheap and plentiful COVID tests suggests the balance is out of whack. The FDA has been timid where it ought to be bold. And it suggests that Republicans have had a point. Regulations exist to protect Americans from harm, whether that be through illness, injury, or some other cause. In the case of COVID testing, though, the FDA's processes have arguably created more problems than they have prevented.
As the party of Big Government — and as the party currently in charge — Democrats must fix this testing mess. The answer isn't to merely eliminate safety rules and leave Americans at the mercy of the markets, but to make the process more flexible and ready to act in emergencies. It's time to make the system work. Two years is too long to wait for COVID tests.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Joel Mathis is a writer with 30 years of newspaper and online journalism experience. His work also regularly appears in National Geographic and The Kansas City Star. His awards include best online commentary at the Online News Association and (twice) at the City and Regional Magazine Association.
-
Her Lotus Year: Paul French's new biography sets lurid rumours straight
The Week Recommends Wallis Simpson's year in China is less scandalous, but 'more interesting' than previously thought
By The Week UK Published
-
Today's political cartoons - November 21, 2024
Cartoons Thursday's cartoons - wild cards, wild turkeys, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Say Nothing: 'sensational' dramatisation of Patrick Radden Keefe's bestselling book
The Week Recommends The series is a 'powerful reminder' of the Troubles
By The Week UK Published
-
The Pentagon faces an uncertain future with Trump
Talking Point The president-elect has nominated conservative commentator Pete Hegseth to lead the Defense Department
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
Should Sonia Sotomayor retire from the Supreme Court?
Talking Points Democrats worry about repeating the history of Ruth Bader Ginsburg
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
US election: who the billionaires are backing
The Explainer More have endorsed Kamala Harris than Donald Trump, but among the 'ultra-rich' the split is more even
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Donald Trump and the fascism debate
Talking Points Democrats sound the alarm, but Republicans say 'it's always the F-word'
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Would Trump really use the military against Americans?
Talking Points The former president says troops could be used against 'enemy within'
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Trump blames migrants for the housing crisis. Experts aren't so sure.
Talking Points Migrants need housing. They also build it.
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published