Are lockdown effects ‘killing more people than Covid’?
Excess deaths data has blown open debate about pandemic restrictions
The effectiveness of the UK’s Covid lockdowns is being debated once again following the publication of new statistics which suggest that the pandemic response may now be killing more people than the virus itself.
Excess deaths data released this week by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) showed that around 1,000 more people than usual are dying each week from conditions other than the virus.
The figures revealed that the rate of excess deaths is 14.4% higher than the five-year average, and that 1,350 more people died than usual in the week ending 5 August.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Covid-related deaths accounted for 469 of the total, but the remaining 881 have “not been explained”, said the Daily Mail.
‘Silent health crisis’
The Telegraph said the figures “suggest the country is facing a new silent health crisis linked to the pandemic response rather than to the virus itself”. The paper reported that the Department of Health has ordered an investigation amid concern that the deaths are linked to delays in treatment for conditions such as cancer, diabetes and heart disease.
The British Heart Foundation told the paper that it was “deeply concerned” by the numbers, while Dr Charles Levinson, chief executive of Doctorcall, a private GP service, said: “Hundreds and hundreds of people dying every week – what is going on?”
He added that he thought “delays in seeking and receiving healthcare” were no doubt the driving force behind the startling figures.
The government was warned as far back as July 2020 that tens of thousands more people could die from the effects of the Covid lockdowns and efforts to protect the NHS than from the virus itself.
Experts told ministers that healthcare delays and the economic fallout of the coronavirus could result in up to 200,000 excess deaths.
‘Divisive and unhelpful’
Lockdown opponents have seized upon the findings, claiming they vindicate their anti-restriction stance. “Saying this over two years ago – but I suppose late is better than never,” said writer and former NHS consultant Gary Sidley on Twitter.
But others pointed the finger away from lockdown as a contributing factor to excess deaths. The writer Frances Coppola said it was not “lockdown effects” that were to blame but “underfunding-of-public-services effects”.
Stuart McDonald, founder and co-chair of the Covid-19 Actuaries Response Group, tweeted that blaming lockdown was “divisive and unhelpful”.
And Twitter statistician Adam Jacobs said that linking the excess deaths to lockdown restrictions was “total b***ocks” because “there were never any lockdown restrictions forbidding people from going to hospital or their GP”.
The problem was that “health services were overwhelmed treating patients with Covid” and therefore, he argued, it was not lockdowns but “Covid itself” that has caused the problem.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Chas Newkey-Burden has been part of The Week Digital team for more than a decade and a journalist for 25 years, starting out on the irreverent football weekly 90 Minutes, before moving to lifestyle magazines Loaded and Attitude. He was a columnist for The Big Issue and landed a world exclusive with David Beckham that became the weekly magazine’s bestselling issue. He now writes regularly for The Guardian, The Telegraph, The Independent, Metro, FourFourTwo and the i new site. He is also the author of a number of non-fiction books.
-
Inside the house of Assad
The Explainer Bashar al-Assad and his father, Hafez, ruled Syria for more than half a century but how did one family achieve and maintain power?
By The Week UK Published
-
Sudoku medium: December 22, 2024
The Week's daily medium sudoku puzzle
By The Week Staff Published
-
Crossword: December 22, 2024
The Week's daily crossword
By The Week Staff Published
-
Marty Makary: the medical contrarian who will lead the FDA
In the Spotlight What Johns Hopkins surgeon and commentator Marty Makary will bring to the FDA
By David Faris Published
-
Long Covid: study shows damage to brain's 'control centre'
The Explainer Research could help scientists understand long-term effects of Covid-19 as well as conditions such as MS and dementia
By The Week UK Published
-
New Alzheimer's drug rejected: is Nice being nasty?
Talking Point Health watchdog has announced lecanemab will be denied to NHS patients on cost grounds
By The Week UK Published
-
FDA OKs new Covid vaccine, available soon
Speed read The CDC recommends the new booster to combat the widely-circulating KP.2 strain
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Mpox: how dangerous is new health emergency?
Today's Big Question Spread of potentially deadly sub-variant more like early days of HIV than Covid, say scientists
By The Week UK Published
-
What is POTS and why is it more common now?
The explainer The condition affecting young women
By Devika Rao, The Week US Last updated
-
Brexit, Matt Hancock and black swans: five takeaways from Covid inquiry report
The Explainer UK was 'unprepared' for pandemic and government 'failed' citizens with flawed response, says damning report
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Should masks be here to stay?
Talking Points New York Governor Kathy Hochul proposed a mask ban. Here's why she wants one — and why it may not make sense.
By Anya Jaremko-Greenwold, The Week US Published