Impressionists on Paper: Degas to Toulouse-Lautrec review

The quality on show at the Royal Academy is 'mixed' but the best works are real 'pearls'

'After the Bath, Woman Drying Herself' by Edgar Degas (1890-1895, detail)
'After the Bath, Woman Drying Herself' by Edgar Degas (1890-1895, detail)
(Image credit: IanDagnall Computing/Alamy Stock Photo)

"Impressionism – at the Royal Academy? Again?" That was my first thought on hearing about this latest show, said Alastair Sooke in The Daily Telegraph: I feared that its "overfamiliarity" would risk inducing "narcolepsy". But I was wrong. "Impressionists on Paper" puts forward a "neat, clear argument": that in the late 19th century, technical advances allowed good quality paper and paints to be manufactured in quantity. This considerably improved the status of works on paper, hitherto rarely appreciated as anything other than "preparatory" drawings. From here on in, "they came to be viewed on a par, almost, with paintings" – and Paris's artists exploited this to the full. Bringing together pictures by all of the movement's most famous names – the show is subtitled "Degas to Toulouse-Lautrec" – as well as works from lesser-known talents, it shows how the impressionists and those who came in their wake took drawing in new directions, transforming the medium. Containing wonders aplenty, from Manet's "rain-slickened" view of a Parisian street to Odilon Redon's view of "human-headed flowers sprouting surreally from a vase", it adds up to an impressive exhibition "filled with delicious little surprises". 

There are a couple of "masterpieces" here, said Jonathan Jones in The Guardian. Van Gogh provides several, including a landscape of Paris's peripheral fortifications, in which he deploys watercolours to turn the sky "a heartbreaking blue"; and an early depiction of a "peasant women with a face like a bereft elf". Just as impressive is Toulouse-Lautrec's "explicit" sketch of a lesbian couple working in a Paris brothel – a "raw yet sensitive" picture that brims with empathy for his subjects. Such highlights aside, the show is short on revelations: Renoir's drawings of women, it turns out, "are just as bland as his paintings"; and even a pair of "dreamlike" Monet views of "surreally shaped seaside cliffs" tell us nothing new about his art. The impressionists "did comparatively little important work on paper. They really were painters or nothing." And this is largely a rather "damp" show. 

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up
To continue reading this article...
Continue reading this article and get limited website access each month.
Get unlimited website access, exclusive newsletters plus much more.
Cancel or pause at any time.
Already a subscriber to The Week?
Not sure which email you used for your subscription? Contact us