What happens if Republicans accept that Trump is guilty?
Trump supporters seem to presume he's innocent of multiple state and federal felony charges. What happens if they are persuaded otherwise?
Former President Donald Trump is the clear frontrunner for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination. He also faces the real possibility of being convicted of several felonies before Election Day.
Trump could be convicted of lying to New York State about paying off a porn actress to hide an alleged extramarital affair, or he could be convicted of keeping top secret national security documents in unsecured rooms and lying to the federal government when ordered to return them. He may also conceivably be convicted of illegally or violently trying to stay in power after losing the 2020 election.
Americans are presumed innocent until found guilty, and Republicans have by and large presumed that Trump is being unfairly persecuted, held to a higher standard than other politicians, or even innocent. That presumption became harder to maintain after news organizations obtained and published a two-minute audio clip of Trump appearing to confess to the felonies charged by special counsel Jack Smith in the secret documents case.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Trump and his conservative media allies are trying to spin this recording as inconclusive, no big deal, or even, as Trump claimed, an "exoneration." But what would happen if Republicans just presumed that Trump is probably guilty?
What are the commentators saying?
A few months ago, proving that Trump willfully kept documents he knew were classified "looked like a major obstacle to conviction. Not so much anymore," Bonnie Kristian wrote at The Daily Beast. The audio of Trump showing off secret Iran attack documents sure "sounds like an admission of guilt" — here's "Trump, with perhaps the most recognizable voice on Earth, saying he knowingly did exactly what he's accused of doing."
Trump is likely to be convicted, but he "shouldn't go to prison" — because he's old, this isn't a violent crime, and it's one "we can absolutely guarantee he won't and can't commit again: All we have to do is not reelect him as president," Kristian said. "One way for that to happen is for Republican voters to accept his guilt here. The tape should make it easy enough."
No, "the sickness of the Republican Party as it is presently constituted is that there is no conceivable set of facts that would permit it to acknowledge Trump's guilt," Jonathan Chait argued at New York Magazine. The GOP has shifted from fighting for conservative policies to just "ruthlessly" fighting, equating "scruples" with weakness. "A willingness to do or say anything to win was the essence of Trump's appeal," and now "the concept of 'crime' has been redefined in the conservative mind to mean activities by Democrats." Regardless of the strength of the cases against Trump, his GOP "loyalists have been trained to either deny any evidence of misconduct by their side or rationalize it as a necessary countermeasure against their enemies."
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
"It's not too late for the Republican Party," conservative former federal appellate judge J. Michael Luttig said in The New York Times. Trump "cynically calculated that his indictment would ensure that a riled-up Republican Party base would nominate him as its standard-bearer in 2024," and he appears to be right so far. "The stewards of the Republican Party" have "managed to convince themselves that an indicted and perhaps even convicted Donald Trump is their party's best hope for the future," but that's a losing bet — "there is no path to the White House for Republicans with Mr. Trump." And if Trump's plausible guilt on Espionage Act charges "fails to shake the Republican Party from its moribund political senses, then it is beyond saving itself. Nor ought it be saved."
What happens next?
Trump's trial on the documents and obstruction charges will start sometime between when the GOP presidential debates begin and when Republicans start voting for their party's nominee. So far, Republican lawmakers are split on whether to support Trump for president "if he's convicted of federal crimes," NBC News reported. "While some GOP lawmakers say they couldn't support a convicted felon for the White House, others are reluctant to close the door," and "the divisions scramble ideological lines." Privately, though, congressional Republicans express "more consternation about the possibility that a convicted criminal could be their party's presidential nominee."
GOP voters seem less disturbed by the idea. A recent NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist poll found that 63% of Republicans said they would vote for Trump even if here were found guilty of a crime. "That so many rank-and-file Republicans would stick with Trump, seemingly no matter what, shows the real stronghold he has on the GOP base — and why he's considered the frontrunner to win the Republican nomination again," NPR News reported. But the Republican enthusiasm isn't broadly shared: The same poll — conducted April 17-19 among 1,291 adults, with a margin of error of ±3.4 percentage points — found that 64% of respondents don't want Trump to be president in general, and 70% are a no if he's convicted of a crime.
Peter has worked as a news and culture writer and editor at The Week since the site's launch in 2008. He covers politics, world affairs, religion and cultural currents. His journalism career began as a copy editor at a financial newswire and has included editorial positions at The New York Times Magazine, Facts on File, and Oregon State University.
-
‘The economics of WhatsApp have been mysterious for years’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Will Democrats impeach Kristi Noem?Today’s Big Question Centrists, lefty activists also debate abolishing ICE
-
Is a social media ban for teens the answer?Talking Point Australia is leading the charge in banning social media for people under 16 — but there is lingering doubt as to the efficacy of such laws
-
Trump threatens Minnesota with Insurrection ActSpeed Read The law was passed in 1807 but has rarely been used
-
Why is Trump threatening defense firms?Talking Points CEO pay and stock buybacks will be restricted
-
‘The security implications are harder still to dismiss’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Judge clears wind farm construction to resumeSpeed Read The Trump administration had ordered the farm shuttered in December over national security issues
-
Trump DOJ targets Fed’s Powell, drawing pushbackSpeed Read Powell called the investigation ‘unprecedented’
-
What are Donald Trump’s options in Iran?Today's Big Question Military strikes? Regime overthrow? Cyberattacks? Sanctions? How can the US help Iranian protesters?
-
Maduro’s capture: two hours that shook the worldTalking Point Evoking memories of the US assault on Panama in 1989, the manoeuvre is being described as the fastest regime change in history
-
Trump’s power grab: the start of a new world order?Talking Point Following the capture of Nicolás Maduro, the US president has shown that arguably power, not ‘international law’, is the ultimate guarantor of security
