Now what? ‘Gutless’ Cameron refuses to debate Miliband
Lib Dems say if Cameron won’t defend coalition’s record on TV, then Nick Clegg will step in
The proposed televised leaders debates are hanging in the balance today after David Cameron refused to take part in a head-to-head debate with Ed Miliband. The MP says he will agree to one debate among all seven party leaders – but only if it takes place before the end of March.
Cameron is being accused alternatively of “being chicken” and of “bullying” the broadcasters, who are left with the dilemma: do they go ahead with the three debates as planned – the head-to-head and the two ‘group of seven’ debates, all scheduled for April - and ‘empty chair’ the Prime Minister?
This raises the spectacle of Ed Miliband answering questions on his own – though the Lib Dems have come in with a last-minute solution, namely that Nick Clegg could stand in for Cameron against the Labour leader.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Former Lib Dem leader Lord [Paddy] Ashdown said this morning: “If the PM hasn’t got the guts to stand up for the record of the government, we would be. Nick Clegg would be there.”
Cameron’s flat refusal to debate Miliband and his agreement to take part in only one ‘group of seven’ debate as long as it takes place in the week of March 23 comes in a letter from Craig Oliver, Cameron’s director of communications, to Sue Inglish, who chairs the broadcasters’ leaders’ debates committee.
Oliver accuses the broadcasters of allowing the debate negotiations to descend into “chaos” by never consulting Number Ten about the schedule when the Prime Minister had made it clear he did not want the debates to interrupt the “short campaign” (1 April onwards).
The letter concludes: “This is our final offer, and to be clear, given the fact this has been a deeply unsatisfactory process and we are within a month of the short campaign, the Prime Minister will not be participating in more than one debate.”
It is no secret, of course, that on the advice of their election guru Lynton Crosby, the Tories have tried everything possible to kill the debates stone dead or at least ensure there are so many leaders involved that few viewers will stay tuned to the resulting “bore-athon”.
Crosby believes that, as the incumbent, Cameron has nothing to gain from the televised debates and plenty to lose. Depending on you believe, that’s because Nigel Farage could wipe the floor with him, and/or Ed Miliband could come across a lot better than the Tory propaganda machine has led the public to expect.
What particularly irks the Prime Minister’s opponents is that it was Cameron himself who, in 2010, declared the party leader debates “vital to the democratic process in the modern media age” – a point Alastair Campbell makes in his blog today.
“How pathetic it is, five years on," writes Campbell, "to watch his wriggling and weaseling to avoid them.”
It is now up to the broadcasters to decide who blinks first - do they ‘empty chair’ Cameron and go ahead with the proposed head-to-head televised debate, with Jeremy Paxman asking the questions in front of an invited audience and Ed Miliband appearing on his own?
“It will be absurd,” Campbell told the Today programme.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Outer Hebrides: a top travel destination
The Week Recommends Discover 'unspoiled beauty' of the Western Isles
By Tess Foley-Cox Published
-
The Biltmore Mayfair review: a quintessential slice of luxury London
The Week Recommends This swanky retreat in Grosvenor Square blends old-world glamour with modern comforts
By Caroline Dolby Published
-
Is ChatGPT's new search engine OpenAI's Google 'killer'?
Talking Point There's a new AI-backed search engine in town. But can it stand up to Google's decades-long hold on internet searches?
By Theara Coleman, The Week US Published
-
What is the next Tory leader up against?
Today's Big Question Kemi Badenoch or Robert Jenrick will have to unify warring factions and win back disillusioned voters – without alienating the centre ground
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
What is Lammy hoping to achieve in China?
Today's Big Question Foreign secretary heads to Beijing as Labour seeks cooperation on global challenges and courts opportunities for trade and investment
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Britain about to 'boil over'?
Today's Big Question A message shared across far-right groups listed more than 30 potential targets for violence in the UK today
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
UK's Starmer slams 'far-right thuggery' at riots
Speed Read The anti-immigrant violence was spurred by false rumors that the suspect in the Southport knife attack was an immigrant
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The Tamils stranded on 'secretive' British island in Indian Ocean
Under the Radar Migrants 'unlawfully detained' since 2021 shipwreck on UK-controlled Diego Garcia, site of important US military base
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
David Cameron resigns as Sunak names shadow cabinet
Speed Read New foreign secretary joins 12 shadow ministers brought in to fill vacancies after electoral decimation
By Arion McNicoll, The Week UK Published
-
Britain's Labour Party wins in a landslide
Speed Read The Conservatives were unseated after 14 years of rule
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published