WhatsApp: is Facebook's acquisition worth $19bn?
Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg says the WhatsApp messaging service is 'incredibly valuable'
FACEBOOK stunned Wall Street last night when it announced it was to buy the messaging service WhatsApp for $19bn (£11.4bn).
Mark Zuckerberg's social networking site will pay a mixture of cash and stocks for the company, in a move that makes instant billionaires of WhatsApp's founders. The deal will consist of $12bn in Facebook shares and another $4bn in cash, plus $3bn in restricted shares to be paid out to WhatsApp's executives at a later date.
The move is Facebook's biggest acquisition yet. Last year, the social network bought the photo-sharing app Instagram for $1bn. It's also the biggest-ever buyout involving a tech start-up, easily trumping the $8.5bn paid by Microsoft for Skype in 2011.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
So what's up with the move for WhatsApp? Can a tiny company of 50 employees really be worth $19bn?
What is WhatsApp?
The five-year-old messaging application allows users to send free text messages to one another, as well as pictures, audio messages and videos. The service is free for the first year and then costs 99 cents per year after that. Unlike many other social media services, the fact that the company already has a revenue stream helps to justify its high price tag.
Is it really worth that much?
The messaging service has over 450 million users and is still going through a period of explosive growth – the company is said to take on a million new users every day. Crucially, its users are very loyal, with 70 per cent using the service daily, The Guardian reports.
"WhatsApp is on a path to connect 1 billion people. The services that reach that milestone are all incredibly valuable," said Zuckerberg, Facebook founder and CEO. "I've known Jan [Koum, the founder of WhatsApp] for a long time and I'm excited to partner with him and his team to make the world more open and connected."
Why does Facebook want to acquire it?
Facebook is working hard to expand its mobile businesses. The purchase of companies like Instagram and Whatsapp offers Facebook greater penetration into the expanding mobile market. Whatsapp is particularly successful in Europe and Latin America where market penetration is believed to be as high as 80 per cent in Brazil, Germany, Portugal and Spain.
Facebook may also be anxious to neutralise competition from younger, faster-growing social networks. "The deal gives Facebook access to the 450m people who use WhatsApp's service every month," says The Telegraph, "effectively turning one of its biggest potential threats into a valuable ally".
The app's developers Jan Koum and Brian Acton, who was turned down by Facebook when he applied for a job there in 2009, will join the board of Facebook after the deal goes through, The Times reports. "We're excited and honoured to partner with Mark and Facebook as we continue to bring our product to more people around the world," Koum said yesterday.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
The real story behind the Stanford Prison Experiment
The Explainer 'Everything you think you know is wrong' about Philip Zimbardo's infamous prison simulation
By Tess Foley-Cox Published
-
Is it safe for refugees to return to Syria?
Talking Point European countries rapidly froze asylum claims after Assad's fall but Syrian refugees may have reason not to rush home
By Richard Windsor, The Week UK Published
-
Quiz of The Week: 14 - 20 December
Have you been paying attention to The Week's news?
By The Week Staff Published
-
Is the AI bubble deflating?
Today's Big Question Growing skepticism and high costs prompt reconsideration
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
How social media is limiting political content
The Explainer Critics say Meta's 'extraordinary move' to have less politics in users' feeds could be 'actively muzzling civic action'
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Twitter's year of Elon Musk: what happens next?
In the Spotlight 'Your platform is dying', says one commentator, but new CEO is aiming for profitability next year
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Turns out Facebook isn't as polarizing as previously thought
Talking Point New studies show that, contrary to prior belief, the algorithm has little effect on driving polarization
By Theara Coleman Published
-
Mark Zuckerberg vs. Elon Musk: a tale of the tech tape
Under the Radar The two men challenged each other to a fight after years of sniping
By Justin Klawans Published
-
How greater online regulation is prompting fears of a ‘splinternet’
feature Government pressure worldwide means the internet is not as open as it once was
By Sorcha Bradley Published
-
Donald Trump, the Pope and the disruptive power of AI images
feature AI-generated deepfakes blur reality and could be used for political disinformation or personal blackmail
By The Week Staff Published
-
The Supreme Court, Section 230 and the future of the internet
feature Lawsuits brought against tech giants could have far-reaching consequences for the internet as we know it
By Richard Windsor Published