Ferdinand 'mum joke' charge, so what about Scudamore?
QPR defender charged for sending tweet with the word 'sket' during deadline day playground spat
It's hard to know which is more pathetic. The fact that a 35-year-old Rio Ferdinand used the down-with-the-kids word 'sket' and made a juvenile 'mum joke' in a tweet six weeks ago or the news on Tuesday evening that he has been charged with misconduct by the Football Association as a result.
You would have thought football's governing body in England might have more important business than bringing to book the QPR defender for his reaction to a little playground trolling, and the use of a word that millions of people – prior to Tuesday – had never heard of.
For those not immersed in the slang of the street, a 'sket', according to the Collins English Dictionary is a promiscuous girl or woman.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Ferdinand used the word in a tweet posted on transfer deadline day six weeks ago. According to The Guardian someone from Manchester had tweeted: "Maybe QPR will sign a good CB [centre-back] they need one". Ferdinand responded to the dig by including the original tweet in his message, and adding: "Get ya mum in, plays the field well son! #sket."
There was some immediate negative reaction to the undoubtedly vulgar tweet, presumably by the usual bunch of professional offence-takers, to which Ferdinand responded a few minutes later: "Don't play the role model card here....take ya slaps!"
If common sense had prevailed the matter would have ended there, but for reasons best known to the Football Association they have, six weeks on, decided to charge Ferdinand with misconduct. The Guardian says that the former England captain's original tweet was considered "abusive and/or indecent and/or insulting and/or improper" because it "included a reference to gender".
Ferdinand has until next Tuesday to respond to the charge but he, and others, might wonder why he finds himself in the dock for a relatively innocuous remark while the FA declined to take action in May following the leaking of sexist emails sent by the Premier League chief executive Richard Scudamore.
FA chairman Greg Dyke defended that decision, explaining: "Scudamore was not an employee of the Football Association and, as such, we had no position in terms of employment policy or taking disciplinary action... in terms of wider FA disciplinary action, we were advised that the FA does not as a matter of policy consider private communications sent with a legitimate expectation of privacy to amount to professional misconduct. The FA has applied this policy on an ongoing basis and in relation to numerous other cases."
Of course, Ferdinand has been in trouble on Twitter before, notably during the fall out of the race row involving his brother, Anton; John Terry; Ashley Cole and a high profile court case.
But as the Daily Mail notes: "This is becoming a complex area for the FA when Ferdinand will be only too aware that in recent months the governing body took no action against either Premier League chief executive Richard Scudamore or FA referees chief David Elleray over discrimination issues.
"No action has yet been taken against Malky Mackay and Iain Moody for their comments in the Textgate scandal last month when they were accused of sending or receiving sexist, homophobic and racist texts."
One rule for the suits, another for the players?
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Starmer vs the farmers: who will win?
Today's Big Question As farmers and rural groups descend on Westminster to protest at tax changes, parallels have been drawn with the miners' strike 40 years ago
By The Week UK Published
-
How secure are royal palaces?
The Explainer Royal family's safety is back in the spotlight after the latest security breach at Windsor
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Magnificent Tudor castles and stately homes to visit this year
The Week Recommends The return of 'Wolf Hall' has sparked an uptick in visits to Britain's Tudor palaces
By Irenie Forshaw, The Week UK Published
-
The Premier League's spending cap: levelling the playing field?
Talking Point Top clubs oppose plans to link spending to income of lowest-earning club, but rule could prevent success gap from widening
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is a new English football regulator an own goal for the game?
Talking Point PM hails 'historic moment for football fans' but West Ham owner warns it could 'ruin' Premier League
By The Week UK Published
-
2023-2024 Premier League predictions: champions, relegation and golden boot
feature A look at the top flight talking points and pundit picks for the new season
By Mike Starling Published
-
Man City: can ‘one of the best sides in history’ win the treble?
feature Guardiola’s Premier League champions have two more trophies in their sights
By The Week Staff Published
-
Premier League: Man City vs. Arsenal predictions
feature What the pundits say about tonight’s title race showdown at the Etihad
By Mike Starling Last updated
-
Antonio Conte leaves Tottenham after ‘extraordinary’ rant at players
feature After another year without a trophy, Spurs are now searching for a new manager
By The Week Staff Published
-
Liverpool 7 Man Utd 0: ‘welcome to Jürgen Klopp’s Liverpool 2.0’
feature Anfield’s ‘new front three’ were on fire in the humbling of their bitter rivals
By Mike Starling Published
-
Man City’s financial charges: what next for the Premier League champions?
feature The club is alleged to have breached financial rules around 100 times over a nine-year period
By Mike Starling Published