Is Ofcom on collision course with GB News?
UK broadcast regulator launches yet another probe into right-leaning channel over impartiality and bias
Ofcom is investigating the prime minister's controversial appearance on a GB News Q&A show, highlighting the media watchdog's ongoing battle to regulate the right-wing TV channel.
"People's Forum: the Prime Minister", which aired on 12 February, resulted in more than 500 complaints related to bias being sent to Ofcom. Rishi Sunak took questions from 100 undecided voters, and presenter Stephen Dixon said the questions had not been seen in advance by the PM or by GB News.
Ofcom requires political and news shows to maintain impartiality, fairness and accuracy – especially in the run-up to elections. In a statement about the investigation, the regulator highlighted parts of its broadcasting code requiring that "an appropriately wide range of significant views must be included and given due weight in such programmes, or in clearly linked and timely programmes".
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The prime minister's spokesperson said Sunak did not regret taking part, adding that media appearances "are an important part of the democratic process".
What did the commentators say?
The impartiality requirement "does not mean that the same amount of time needs to be given to opposing views", said Sky News. But the issue of political figures such as Jacob Rees-Mogg presenting topical programmes is "increasingly becoming contentious as more MPs take these jobs".
The problem, said Politico's London Playbook newsletter, is that it's "not at all clear what Ofcom is investigating". Complainants accused Sunak of answering only "selected questions", and criticised the timing of the show, which aired just days before two by-elections (both of which the Conservatives lost). Questions were also raised about the presence of two "so-called 'vaccine-damaged' participants" in such a small audience. Ofcom "wouldn't say whether those issues were the subject of the probe".
But GB News "emphasised on the night of the broadcast" that Keir Starmer had been invited to take part in a programme with the same format, said The Telegraph.
The Labour leader's decision not to do so is perhaps explained by the five occasions that GB News has been found in breach of Ofcom guidelines since launching in 2021, said Left Foot Forward. These occasions included Ofcom ruling that potentially harmful content related to the Covid-19 vaccine had been shared by presenter Mark Steyn, who "wrongly claimed figures from the UK Health Security Agency data provided evidence of a third booster causing hospitalisation and death".
The network is also under 12 ongoing investigations, many related to impartiality issues. But Ofcom last week rejected 70 complaints about GB News presenter Neil Oliver linking the Covid-19 vaccine to "turbo cancer". It appears that Oliver's "freedom to express misleading or indeed outright deranged ideas trumps Ofcom's mandate to prevent harmful or offensive content", said Jane Martinson in The Guardian.
This "odd decision" helps to "sum up where Ofcom is failing". Despite a "constant bombardment of extreme content from GB News", lately the watchdog has "fetishised free speech above all else" – even above protecting the public from harmful content, despite its newly expanded remit as the formal regulator for online harm in the recent Online Safety Act.
Quite right, said Andrew Tettenborn on Spiked. "We should be reducing, not increasing, the power of regulators to police what we can see and hear." The British people "should be trusted to decide which news broadcasts to trust or not", rather than being treated like "schoolchildren".
What next?
Ofcom's investigation into Sunak's appearance on GB News "serves as a good get-out for Starmer not to appear", said Politico.
But surely the best way to balance Sunak's televised Q&A would be for the Labour leader to accept the network's invitation, said right-wing news blog Guido Fawkes. In any case, Ofcom "urgently needs to clarify their regulations as the political broadcasting landscape changes". It's clear that "channels are still in limbo about what exactly will be allowed during the election campaign".
Yet GB News "shows little concern about Ofcom", said Martinson in The Guardian. The investigations into Rees-Mogg's shows have not stopped him persuading the prime minister "to take his place presenting on the channel on Monday".
"Ofcom is in a challenging position in the face of wily new operatives and politically motivated bad actors," she wrote. "Yet it would do well to remember that the dangers of misinformation, like pollution or disease, are often difficult to spot until it's too late."
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Harriet Marsden is a writer for The Week, mostly covering UK and global news and politics. Before joining the site, she was a freelance journalist for seven years, specialising in social affairs, gender equality and culture. She worked for The Guardian, The Times and The Independent, and regularly contributed articles to The Sunday Times, The Telegraph, The New Statesman, Tortoise Media and Metro, as well as appearing on BBC Radio London, Times Radio and “Woman’s Hour”. She has a master’s in international journalism from City University, London, and was awarded the "journalist-at-large" fellowship by the Local Trust charity in 2021.
-
The Onion is having a very ironic laugh with Infowars
The Explainer The satirical newspaper is purchasing the controversial website out of bankruptcy
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
How AI is offering journalists protection from persecution in Venezuela
Under the Radar Media organisations launch news show hosted by AI-generated avatars to 'shelter their real-life journalists'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Reporter on leave over alleged RFK relationship
Speed Read New York magazine political reporter Olivia Nuzzi admitted to having a personal relationship with her subject
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Rupert Murdoch's behind-closed-doors succession court battle
The Explainer Media mogul's legal dispute with three of his children over control of his influential empire begins today
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
OpenAI, Condé Nast and the future of the media
In the Spotlight Eye-catching deal for use of content to train chatbots, but other publishers are worried they're signing away their souls
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Rupert Murdoch is in a 'Succession'-style rift with his kids over his media empire
The Explainer Murdoch and his son Lachlan are attempting to maintain his empire's conservative swing following his eventual death
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
The increasing ubiquity of 'pink-slime' journalism
The Explainer The issue is becoming more concerning as the US election draws closer
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
Shake-up at The Washington Post leaves paper's position uncertain
Talking Points The soon-to-be executive editor of the Post currently works at a British conservative paper, The Telegraph
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published