Are Facebook privacy settings handing a ‘free pass’ to terrorists?
MI5 chief attacks plans to provide end-to-end encryption on social media platform
Terrorists could be given a “free pass” by Facebook if the social media giant follows through on plans to introduce stronger encryption on its network, the head of MI5 has claimed.
In his first public interview, UK spy boss Ken McCallum said plans proposed by Facebook chief executive Mark Zuckerberg would allow terrorists to plot attacks on the company’s platforms, while Facebook blocked hundreds of counter-terrorism investigations by security services.
Speaking to Times Radio, McCallum acknowledged the need for user privacy after Facebook expressed its intention to move away from its function as a digital “public square”, and instead become more like a user’s online “living room”. But the director general added that MI5’s job is to “deal with a one in a million case, where the living room is a terrorist living room”.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Facebook’s encryption plans mean it will no longer use algorithms to flag illegal content as messages can be viewed only by the sender and receiver. The company argues that it should be able to pass on suspicious content if security services obtain permission from the home secretary and a judge.
The MI5 head stressed security services were “not in any way seeking some form of surveillance state”, but emphasised there were “rare” occasions when it was essential security services could gain access to the contents of messages sent by those suspected of participating in illegal activities if there were concerns of “very substantial proportions”.
Decisions taken in “California boardrooms” by Facebook executives are “every bit as relevant” to security services’ ability to do their jobs “as decisions taken in Afghanistan or Syria”, he told Times Radio.
Facebook argues its end-to-end encryption will provide additional safety and security to its users, arguing it is “building strong safety measures” into the plans “including using information like behavioural patterns and user reports” to identify criminal activity.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
McCallum’s criticism of Facebook’s encryption plans comes weeks after Home Secretary Priti Patel warned the idea could jeopardise work to combat child sexual abuse. Patel said Facebook “intends to blind itself” to the proliferation of child sexual abuse images on its platforms by preventing access to messaging content from outside parties, says the BBC.
But supporters of encryption argue that any “legally enforced” weakening of encryption algorithms could potentially be exploited by criminals.
Jenny Afia, from legal firm Schillings, said end-to-end encryption had “already prevented a lot of crime”, while Jim Killock, from Open Rights Group, said encryption was “popular” with those who want “security and protection from fraud, scams and abuse of their data”.
"It would be completely unreasonable to ban or limit everyday security for one set of people over the other,” he said.
Other encryption supporters told the BBC it provides a “secure means of communication” for “dissidents and whistleblowers” and could put them at risk if back-door access were made available to governments.
Sorcha Bradley is a writer at The Week and a regular on “The Week Unwrapped” podcast. She worked at The Week magazine for a year and a half before taking up her current role with the digital team, where she mostly covers UK current affairs and politics. Before joining The Week, Sorcha worked at slow-news start-up Tortoise Media. She has also written for Sky News, The Sunday Times, the London Evening Standard and Grazia magazine, among other publications. She has a master’s in newspaper journalism from City, University of London, where she specialised in political journalism.
-
Is Daylight Saving Time good for the climate?
Under the Radar Scientists are split over the potential environmental benefits of the hotly contested time change
By Abby Wilson Published
-
Life in the post-truth era
Opinion The mainstream media can't hold back a tsunami of misinformation
By Theunis Bates Published
-
Magazine printables - November 8, 2024
Puzzles and Quizzes Issue - November 8, 2024
By The Week US Published
-
Is the AI bubble deflating?
Today's Big Question Growing skepticism and high costs prompt reconsideration
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
How social media is limiting political content
The Explainer Critics say Meta's 'extraordinary move' to have less politics in users' feeds could be 'actively muzzling civic action'
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Twitter's year of Elon Musk: what happens next?
Why Everyone's Talking About 'Your platform is dying', says one commentator, but new CEO is aiming for profitability next year
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Turns out Facebook isn't as polarizing as previously thought
Talking Point New studies show that, contrary to prior belief, the algorithm has little effect on driving polarization
By Theara Coleman Published
-
Mark Zuckerberg vs. Elon Musk: a tale of the tech tape
Under the Radar The two men challenged each other to a fight after years of sniping
By Justin Klawans Published
-
Clop gang: Russian hackers issue ‘dark web ultimatum’ to BBC, Boots and BA
Under the Radar Affected companies urged to install security patches and not pay cyber criminals behind hack
By Rebekah Evans Published
-
How greater online regulation is prompting fears of a ‘splinternet’
feature Government pressure worldwide means the internet is not as open as it once was
By Sorcha Bradley Published
-
Donald Trump, the Pope and the disruptive power of AI images
feature AI-generated deepfakes blur reality and could be used for political disinformation or personal blackmail
By The Week Staff Published