Is Facebook always listening to me?
Company admits its contractors transcribed Messenger app voice recordings, but insists it has now stopped the practice
Facebook has admitted that it paid contractors to listen to voice recordings of users’ private conversations.
The social media giant confirmed that it had been “transcribing users’ audio” after company insiders told Bloomberg that people were hired to analyse conversations on the firm’s Messenger service.
The aim was to check the accuracy of speech-to-text artificial intelligence (AI) systems, the news site says.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Facebook told Bloomberg that it has now stopped transcribing user recordings after rival tech firms, including Apple, Google and Amazon, came under fire for a similar practice.
“Much like Apple and Google, we paused human review of audio more than a week ago,” a Facebook spokesperson said.
Although “human oversight” of automated systems is commonplace in the tech industry, The Guardian says that examining user conversations from chat apps and voice-activated speakers poses “a significantly higher level of concern over privacy”.
How - and why - Facebook records your voice
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
As reported by The Daily Telegraph, audio recordings were analysed courtesy of the “voice chat transcription option” in Facebook’s Messenger app. The option lets users record a brief audio clip, which is then sent to a recipient and transcribed into text through AI.
Facebook’s privacy policy doesn’t explicitly say that these recordings would be evaluated by a human moderator, but it does state that “content, communications and other information you provide” may be shared with “vendors and service providers who support our business”, the paper adds.
Facebook claims that it used human moderators to help improve the accuracy of its products, which include the AI system that transcribes audio messages into text on the Messenger app, the Financial Times notes.
The firm also insists that the identity of users was anonymised before their voice recordings were passed on to the contractors, the FT says.��
What did the contractors hear?
Sources familiar with the practice told Bloomberg that the contractors were not told how the audio files were obtained or where they were recorded. The moderators were simply asked to listen to the recordings and transcribe them.
The company insiders say the moderators could listen to “Facebook users’ conversations”, some of which contained “vulgar content”, the news site reports. The contractors, however, were unaware as to why Facebook needed the recordings transcribed.
Contractors working for other firms appear to have been exposed to more extreme content.
In an interview with Vice, one moderator, working for the Microsoft-owned video calling service Skype, said that they could hear conversations that could “clearly be described as phone sex”, as well as “people entering full addresses” or asking the Cortana AI system to “provide search returns on pornography queries.
“While I don’t know exactly what one could do with this information, it seems odd to me that it isn’t being handled in a more controlled environment,” the contractor said.
So is Facebook always listening to me?
Judging by comments made to Bloomberg, it would appear that Facebook does not listen to every user at all times - especially now the firm states that it no longer examines voice recordings.
But Jake Moore, a cybersecurity specialist at ESET, told Forbes that Facebook “already admits to scanning Messenger content such as text, images and links for many reasons so transcribing audio or video content is really just an add on to what they are already doing.
“Micro targeted advertising is their multimillion-dollar business so naturally there may be data within this audio which will add to people’s profile,” he said. “However, where this becomes a privacy matter or even grey area is, people wrongly tend to assume that this content is private from all eyes and ears.”
-
‘Social media is the new tabloid’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Can the NBA survive FBI’s gambling investigation?Talking Points A casualty of the ‘sports gambling revolution’
-
How are ICE’s recruitment woes complicating Trump’s immigration agenda?TODAY’S BIG QUESTION Lowered training standards and ‘athletically allergic’ hopefuls are hindering the White House plan to turn the Department of Homeland Security into a federal police force
-
Trump allies reportedly poised to buy TikTokSpeed Read Under the deal, U.S. companies would own about 80% of the company
-
What an all-bot social network tells us about social mediaUnder The Radar The experiment's findings 'didn't speak well of us'
-
Broken brains: The social price of digital lifeFeature A new study shows that smartphones and streaming services may be fueling a sharp decline in responsibility and reliability in adults
-
Supreme Court allows social media age check lawSpeed Read The court refused to intervene in a decision that affirmed a Mississippi law requiring social media users to verify their ages
-
What's Linda Yaccarino's legacy? And what's next for X?Today's Big Question An 'uncertain future' in the age of TikTok
-
Social media: How 'content' replaced friendshipFeature Facebook has shifted from connecting with friends to competing with entertainment companies
-
Fake AI job seekers are flooding US companiesIn the Spotlight It's getting harder for hiring managers to screen out bogus AI-generated applicants
-
Meta on trial: What will become of Mark Zuckerberg's social media empire?Today's Big Question Despite the CEO's attempt to ingratiate himself with Trump, Meta is on trial, accused by the U.S. government of breaking antitrust law