Trudeaus’ split: should we care about private lives of politicians?
The separation between what is private and public is ‘dubious’, says one commentator

Justin Trudeau, the Canadian prime minister, and his wife, Sophie Grégoire Trudeau, are to separate after 18 years of marriage.
The pair were a “political power couple”, said The Telegraph, and Grégoire has been not only “the wife to this prime minister and mother of his children” but also “an adviser, on everything from campaign style to the biggest decisions Trudeau has made”, the Toronto Star explained.
Therefore, their split has reopened the question of how much the private lives of politicians matter.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What did the papers say?
“It wasn’t too long ago that relationship difficulties could sink a political career – or cost you your head,” wrote John Sakellariadis for Politico, but news of the Trudeau split “isn’t exactly sending shockwaves across Ottawa or Washington”.
This is partly because “conjugal course corrections” are becoming more commonplace in society and also because Trudeau is “just the latest in a rapidly expanding line of elected officials who have run into marital trouble while in office”. Others include Nicolas Sarkozy, Silvio Berlusconi and Vladimir Putin.
But the media’s attitude to the personal lives of politicians has evolved over time. Although politicians have sought the “glory and the burden of public service”, said Time magazine in 1969, they do “have the right, simply as human beings, to privacy, relaxation and escape from responsibility”.
By 2004, wrote Martin Kettle for The Guardian, several news organisations would “actively promote the principle that whatever is of interest to the public is also in the public interest”.
“No politician should be covered solely through the lens of the worst/most embarrassing thing they’ve ever done,” wrote Chris Cillizza in The Washington Post, “but that doesn’t mean that the focus on the personal is completely misguided or corrosive to politics, journalism or both.”
Journalists should try to help us understand what makes people who “had the audacity to put themselves forward as the single best person in the country to represent it – tick”.
Content relating to the private lives of politicians “needs to be understood in terms of its relevance to their ability to execute their role”, wrote Bella Vacaflores for The Ethics Centre.
Therefore, she argued, we should “actively dismiss and avoid searching for details that tell us nothing about the honesty, accountability, competence, integrity, judgement, and self-discipline of a public official, no matter how salacious”. But equally, we can “feel justified in pursuing information that reveals their historic performance in such areas”.
Yet “the idea that ethics has anything to do with politics is often (justifiably) met with some degree of scepticism”, wrote Joshua Hobbs, lecturer and consultant in applied ethics, on The Conversation.
John F. Kennedy is “generally thought of as a competent politician, but with a very chaotic (and unethical) personal life”, wrote Hobbs. But he is “the exception” as it is “more likely that someone with an unethical private life would carry this behaviour into their politics”.
The “separation between private and public is dubious”, agreed Suzanne Moore in The Guardian. “We could say that nothing that happens outside a parliamentary setting is anyone’s goddamned business”, she wrote, “and just accept the protection this attitude affords powerful men.”
But “does it actually matter how men treat women in their personal lives?” she asked. “You know what, it does.”
What next?
The “big question on the lips of the chattering class in Ottawa” is whether the divorce could “change his political future”, wrote Kyle Duggan for Politico.
He’s “down in the polls, and not by a little”, he “recently moved around much of his team in Cabinet, to little fanfare”, plus “he’s getting legally separated and the kids are staying with him”, wrote Duggan.
But if the separation has been “weighing on” Trudeau and “causing his performance to struggle, putting it out there might give him an opportunity to bounce back and get his head back in the game”, he added.
Trudeau is yet to formally confirm whether he will be running for a fourth term in the Canadian election scheduled for October 2025, and his separation is the first of any sitting Canadian prime minister since his own parents’ divorce in 1977, noted the Daily Mail, so there is “little precedent for how it could affect his political ratings. However, it’s safe to say that his wife has been an effective political asset to him over the years – often seen by his side in election campaigns.”
And with his political career “closely tied to his personal life” his separation “could have a large impact on his future”, it added.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Chas Newkey-Burden has been part of The Week Digital team for more than a decade and a journalist for 25 years, starting out on the irreverent football weekly 90 Minutes, before moving to lifestyle magazines Loaded and Attitude. He was a columnist for The Big Issue and landed a world exclusive with David Beckham that became the weekly magazine’s bestselling issue. He now writes regularly for The Guardian, The Telegraph, The Independent, Metro, FourFourTwo and the i new site. He is also the author of a number of non-fiction books.
-
Gandhi arrests: Narendra Modi's 'vendetta' against India's opposition
The Explainer Another episode threatens to spark uproar in the Indian PM's long-running battle against the country's first family
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK
-
How the woke right gained power in the US
Under the radar The term has grown in prominence since Donald Trump returned to the White House
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK
-
Codeword: April 24, 2025
The Week's daily codeword puzzle
By The Week Staff
-
Elon Musk has his 'legion.' How will Republicans encourage other Americans to have babies?
Today's Big Question The pronatalist movement finds itself in power
By Joel Mathis, The Week US
-
How might Trump's tariffs affect the luxury goods market?
Today's Big Question Luxury clothes, cars and watches could take a hit in the coming months
By Justin Klawans, The Week US
-
Could Trump's tariff war be his undoing with the GOP?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION The catastrophic effects of the president's 'Liberation Day' tariffs might create a serious wedge between him and the rest of the Republican party
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US
-
Is Elon Musk's DOGE job coming to an end?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION Plummeting popularity, a stinging electoral defeat and Tesla's shrinking market share could be pulling the tech billionaire out of Trump's presidential orbit
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US
-
Detentions and hostile treatment: is it safe to visit the US?
The Explainer Spate of interrogations and deportations at US border sparking decline in overseas visitors
By The Week UK
-
Why are student loan borrowers falling behind on payments?
Today's Big Question Delinquencies surge as the Trump administration upends the program
By Joel Mathis, The Week US
-
What dangers does the leaked Signal chat expose the US to?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION The White House's ballooning group chat scandal offered a masterclass in what not to say when prying eyes might be watching
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US
-
23andMe's bankruptcy is not just a finance story, it is a potential privacy crisis
IN THE SPOTLIGHT The ancestral testing juggernaut's corporate collapse opens a new — but not wholly unforeseen — front in the battle over who has access to your genetic data
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US