Covid lab leak: is conspiracy theory becoming concrete truth?
US Energy Department becomes second government agency to conclude virus most likely came from Chinese laboratory
The contentious debate over the origins of the coronavirus took another turn over the weekend after a new report from the US Energy Department pointed to an accidental laboratory leak in China.
The shift in the department’s view came after a new classified intelligence report was provided to the White House and key members of Congress, which was first reported by The Wall Street Journal.
Its conclusions are supported by the FBI, which believes with “moderate confidence” that the virus first emerged accidentally from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, a Chinese lab that worked on coronaviruses.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
‘Once little more than a fringe theory’
The New York Times has reported that some officials briefed on the new intelligence contained in the Energy Department report said that it was “relatively weak” and that its conclusion was made with “low confidence”.
A low-confidence assessment “generally means that the information obtained is not reliable enough or is too fragmented to make a more definitive analytic judgment or that there is not enough information available to draw a more robust conclusion”, said CNN.
Nevertheless the latest assessment “further adds to the divide in the US government over whether the Covid-19 pandemic began in China in 2019 as the result of a lab leak or whether it emerged naturally”, said the news network. “The various intelligence agencies have been split on the matter for years.”
Four other US intelligence agencies, including the National Intelligence Council, have maintained their belief that the virus most likely emerged through natural transmission, probably via the large food and live animal market in Wuhan.
However, the Energy Department report “lends more attention to a belief that was once considered – and by some, still is – to be little more than a fringe theory”, said Forbes.
‘An asymmetrical debate’
“Most mass media have reported the lab-leak debate as a bitter debate between two groups of scientists,” said Slate. “In fact, the debate is asymmetrical. On the one side, the overwhelming weight of opinion among virologists, epidemiologists, evolutionary biologists, and other scientists with experience and expertise is that Covid reached humans directly from an animal host or hosts.”
Although a few such experts “have supported the lab-leak side”, added the magazine, the most prominent proponents of a lab-leak origin are those “who lack relevant expertise or experience”.
The New York Times argued that “how the pandemic began has become a divisive line of intelligence reporting, and recent congressional reports have not been bipartisan”. Many Republicans in Congress have been ramping up calls for a proper investigation into the lab-leak theory.
Unsurprisingly, Chinese authorities have repeatedly pushed back against claims that the virus came from a laboratory, calling the theory a lie that has no basis in science and is politically motivated.
In response to the latest Energy Department findings, a spokesperson for China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Mao Ning, highlighted the “authoritative and scientific” conclusion reached after a 2021 field mission between Chinese and World Health Organization (WHO) experts, who determined the lab-leak hypothesis was “highly unlikely”. Yet the WHO mission has been widely criticised as lacking transparency.
“Right now, there is not a definitive answer that has emerged from the intelligence community on this question,” National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan told CNN. “Some elements of the intelligence community have reached conclusions on one side, some on the other. A number of them have said they just don’t have enough information to be sure.”
Sullivan said US President Joe Biden had directed the national laboratories, which are part of the Department of Energy, to be brought into the assessment to determine the origins of the outbreak.
“The lab-leak debate has raged for three years now, without reaching a universally accepted resolution,” said Slate. What is more “there may not be a conclusive answer for a while: It took 29 years to definitively identify the source of Ebola, 26 years for HIV/AIDS, and 15 years for SARS.”
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Wildlife populations drop a 'catastrophic' 73%
Speed Read The decline occurred between 1970 and 2020
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Arizona kicks off swing-state early voting
Speed Read The voting began with less than a month to go before the presidential election
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Today's political cartoons - October 10, 2024
Cartoons Thursday's cartoons - Donald's DNA, deficit blues, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Long Covid: study shows damage to brain's 'control centre'
The Explainer Research could help scientists understand long-term effects of Covid-19 as well as conditions such as MS and dementia
By The Week UK Published
-
New Alzheimer's drug rejected: is Nice being nasty?
Talking Point Health watchdog has announced lecanemab will be denied to NHS patients on cost grounds
By The Week UK Published
-
FDA OKs new Covid vaccine, available soon
Speed read The CDC recommends the new booster to combat the widely-circulating KP.2 strain
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Mpox: how dangerous is new health emergency?
Today's Big Question Spread of potentially deadly sub-variant more like early days of HIV than Covid, say scientists
By The Week UK Published
-
What is POTS and why is it more common now?
The explainer The condition affecting young women
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Brexit, Matt Hancock and black swans: five takeaways from Covid inquiry report
The Explainer UK was 'unprepared' for pandemic and government 'failed' citizens with flawed response, says damning report
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Should masks be here to stay?
Talking Points New York Governor Kathy Hochul proposed a mask ban. Here's why she wants one — and why it may not make sense.
By Anya Jaremko-Greenwold, The Week US Published
-
Covid might be to blame for an uptick in rare cancers
The explainer The virus may be making us more susceptible to certain cancers
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published