Social care: the unanswered questions
How the government's proposals will be implemented and funded remains unclear
Boris Johnson is promising to reform adult social care in England with funding from a newly announced National Insurance hike.
The manifesto-breaking 1.25% tax increase will kick in from next April, before being rebadged as a health and social care levy from 2023. The government yesterday published a “Build Back Better” plan explaining how the money raised will be used to both improve social care and tackle the Covid-related backlog of NHS patients.
But while critics have long been calling for reform, key questions remain unanswered.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
When will the cash flow be diverted from the NHS to social care?
Most of the money raised by the tax increase will go to the NHS rather than social care for first the three years of the new funding system.
Downing Street estimates that the new tax will raise an additional £12bn a year. Of the total £36bn gained over the next three years, £5.4bn is earmarked for adult social care in England.
As The Guardian noted, that equates to “less than one in every six pounds” of the extra money. And what proportion will be allocated to social care after the intial phase of the plan remains unclear.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Health Secretary Sajid Javid admitted during a press conference yesterday that he was unable to say “how much money social care will actually get and when, because it all depends on how NHS gets on with clearing the backlog”, tweeted Sky News’ Kate McCann.
She added: “NHS bosses say it could take ten years...”
What happens to people who need care before the reforms kick in?
As part of the new social care plans, the government will introduce an £86,000 cap on how much individuals must pay towards the cost of their care.
“However, the fine print of the rushed-out plans revealed that the cap, to be implemented in October 2023, applies only to ‘personal care’, the physical acts of caring that are regulated by the Care Quality Commission,” reported The Telegraph. So the “very expensive” costs of accommodation, cleaning and food will not be included.
In a further blow, thousands of adults entering the adult care system before the new social care funding plans kick will not be protected by the cap, which is “not retrospective”, said The Mirror.
Around 250,000 people are currently in residential or nursing care in England.
Will the new money reverse the effects of previous spending cuts?
Councils fear that the money raised by the new tax hike will be “swallowed up” by covering the cost of the cap and funding the NHS, reported the BBC’s health correspondent Nick Triggle.“If these fears are realised, it would mean the system remains on its knees with insufficient staff to provide the care people need.”
The Institute of Fiscal Studies has warned that additional funding for social care over the next three years will not be enough to reverse cuts made in the mid 2010s. “Thus, while more people will become entitled to financial support as a result of the reforms planned, many people with care needs not considered severe enough will continue to miss out,” said the think tank.
According to an IFS analysis of government figures, at an average of £1.8bn per year, the social care funding boost is equivalent to around 9% of what councils spent on adult social care services in 2019-20.
“However, the early-to-mid 2010s saw big cuts in spending, despite an ageing population and rising numbers of people with learning disabilities,” said the economic research institute. “And as a result, adult social care spending per person was 7.5% lower in real terms in 2019-20, the latest year for which we have data, than in 2009-10.”
The IFS concluded that “while the precise path for spending - and hence for the availability and quality of care - is unclear, it is clear that the extra funding will not be sufficient to reverse the cuts in the numbers receiving care seen during the 2010s”.
What about staff shortages?
The government says that under the new plan, £500m will be invested in providing “support in professionalising and developing the workforce”, including funding hundreds of thousands of training places and development opportunities.
But care companies say the plans only contain “vague commitments about staff retention and training”, and should be “accompanied by clearer targets for improving pay and progression”, said the i news site.
More than 430,000 people left jobs in adult social care in 2019-20, with many citing low pay, burnout, and poorer working benefits, according to a recent report from MPs on the Health and Social Care Committee.
“While £500m investment over three years in training and improving well-being is welcome, the benefits will not be felt until next year and until there is parallel action on pay and career progression,” Nina Hemmings of The Care Worker’s Charity told the i site.
-
Is Elon Musk about to disrupt British politics?
Today's big question Mar-a-Lago talks between billionaire and Nigel Farage prompt calls for change on how political parties are funded
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
The complaint that could change reality TV for ever
In the Spotlight A labour complaint filed against Love Is Blind has the potential to bolster the rights of reality stars across the US
By Abby Wilson Published
-
Assad's fall upends the Captagon drug empire
Multi-billion-dollar drug network sustained former Syrian regime
By Richard Windsor, The Week UK Published
-
John Prescott: was he Labour's last link to the working class?
Today's Big Quesiton 'A total one-off': tributes have poured in for the former deputy PM and trade unionist
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Last hopes for justice for UK's nuclear test veterans
Under the Radar Thousands of ex-service personnel say their lives have been blighted by aggressive cancers and genetic mutations
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Donald Trump wreck the Brexit deal?
Today's Big Question President-elect's victory could help UK's reset with the EU, but a free-trade agreement with the US to dodge his threatened tariffs could hinder it
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
What is the next Tory leader up against?
Today's Big Question Kemi Badenoch or Robert Jenrick will have to unify warring factions and win back disillusioned voters – without alienating the centre ground
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
What is Lammy hoping to achieve in China?
Today's Big Question Foreign secretary heads to Beijing as Labour seeks cooperation on global challenges and courts opportunities for trade and investment
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Britain about to 'boil over'?
Today's Big Question A message shared across far-right groups listed more than 30 potential targets for violence in the UK today
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
UK's Starmer slams 'far-right thuggery' at riots
Speed Read The anti-immigrant violence was spurred by false rumors that the suspect in the Southport knife attack was an immigrant
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published