Will Tigray truce deliver lasting peace in Ethiopia?
Rebels and government agree ‘cessation of hostilities’ to allow humanitarian aid to reach millions in need
Tigrayan rebels have agreed to a “cessation of hostilities” in the almost 17-month war in Ethiopia after the government announced an indefinite humanitarian truce just a day earlier.
In a statement sent to the Agence France-Presse (AFP) news agency, the rebels said they were “committed to implementing” an end to the fighting “effective immediately”. They called on the Ethiopian authorities to speed up the delivery of emergency aid into Tigray, where hundreds of thousands face starvation as a result of a blockade during the conflict.
Since the outbreak of fighting in November 2020, “thousands have died”, The Guardian reported, and many more civilians have fled their homes “as the conflict has expanded from Tigray to the neighbouring regions of Amhara and Afar”.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Tentative peace
In a statement announcing the truce, the Ethiopian government called for “the donor community to redouble their generous contributions to alleviate the situation and reiterate its commitment to work in collaboration with relevant organisations to expedite the provision of humanitarian assistance to those in need”.
The government also asked the Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF), the regional party that led the war against Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed, to “desist from all acts of further aggression and withdraw from areas they have occupied in neighbouring regions”, adding that such a move would “pave the way for the resolution of the conflict”.
The statement came as a “surprise” to observers, said Al Jazeera. “Fighting has dragged on for more than a year, triggering a humanitarian crisis, as accounts have emerged of mass rapes and massacres.” Both sides have been accused of human rights violations.
“Western nations have been urging both sides to agree to a ceasefire,” France 24 reported, with the US, the EU, the UK and Canada all “hailing the truce declaration”.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said, in a statement released shortly after the government’s announcement: “This commitment to a cessation of hostilities should be a critical step towards the resumption and sustainment of humanitarian assistance to the people in Tigray and all Ethiopian regions and communities in need.
“It should also serve as an essential foundation of an inclusive political process to achieve progress towards common security and prosperity for all the people of Ethiopia.”
The EU delegation to Ethiopia tweeted: “The EU welcomes the declaration of a humanitarian truce by the [government[ of Ethiopia and the statement on cessation of hostilities by the Tigrayan Authorities.”
The UN World Food Programme warned in January that three-quarters of Tigray’s population of six million were “using extreme coping strategies to survive” and that more than a third were “suffering an extreme lack of food”.
Responding to the deal, a spokesperson for UN Secretary General António Guterres said that he “hopes that this truce will translate into an effective cessation of hostilities, respected by all parties in this conflict, to allow for effective humanitarian access for all who need it”.
End of the war?
The conflict in Tigray is already “believed to have caused the deaths of tens of thousands of people and the displacement of millions”, The Washington Post said. And “although the war has subsided in several places… concerns remain in the northeastern Afar region”.
The government in Addis Ababa has repeatedly “denied blocking aid to the region”, the Financial Times (FT) reported. However, “UN officials in Tigray have said that no trucks have made it through since December”.
David Satterfield, US special envoy for the Horn of Africa, told the paper it is hoped the deal “will substantially improve the humanitarian situation on the ground and pave the way for the resolution of the conflict in northern Ethiopia without further bloodshed”.
It could also lead to direct talks between the TPLF and the Ethiopian government, which “would present the best opportunity” to end the conflict, the FT said.
Analysts described the truce as “an important step but urged the government to act quickly to ease humanitarian access to Tigray”, The Guardian reported.
William Davison, the International Crisis Group’s senior Ethiopia expert, told the paper: “The unconditional and unrestricted delivery of aid could also help create enough trust to pave the way for ceasefire talks and, eventually, dialogue.”
However, knitting together a more permanent settlement between different factions in the ethnically divided nation could prove tricky.
In an article on Foreign Policy, Getachew Reda, a member of the executive committee of the TPLF, argued that “international solidarity with Kyiv in the face of Russian aggression is admirable” but that “Tigrayans brutalised by Ethiopia and Eritrea deserve the same”.
The truce is the first time “that both sides have expressed willingness to halt fighting”, Al Jazeera said, which is “a breakthrough of sorts in an atmosphere where threats of annihilation and even hate speech have become commonplace”.
But “a number of factors including lack of details and conflicting statements continue to shroud Ethiopia’s latest civil war truce in mystery”, the broadcaster added. The question of whether the peace will hold remains “open to speculation”.
-
Will California's EV mandate survive Trump, SCOTUS challenge?
Today's Big Question The Golden State's climate goal faces big obstacles
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
'Underneath the noise, however, there’s an existential crisis'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
2024: the year of distrust in science
In the Spotlight Science and politics do not seem to mix
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Why Assad fell so fast
The Explainer The newly liberated Syria is in an incredibly precarious position, but it's too soon to succumb to defeatist gloom
By The Week UK Published
-
Yes Band Aid, Ethiopians do know it's Christmas time
In the Spotlight East African nation was one of the first to adopt Christianity, but celebrates with other Orthodox Christian churches on 7 January
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Romania's election rerun
The Explainer Shock result of presidential election has been annulled following allegations of Russian interference
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Russia's shadow war in Europe
Talking Point Steering clear of open conflict, Moscow is slowly ratcheting up the pressure on Nato rivals to see what it can get away with.
By The Week UK Published
-
Cutting cables: the war being waged under the sea
In the Spotlight Two undersea cables were cut in the Baltic sea, sparking concern for the global network
By The Week UK Published
-
The nuclear threat: is Vladimir Putin bluffing?
Talking Point Kremlin's newest ballistic missile has some worried for Nato nations
By The Week UK Published
-
Russia vows retaliation for Ukrainian missile strikes
Speed Read Ukraine's forces have been using U.S.-supplied, long-range ATCMS missiles to hit Russia
By Arion McNicoll, The Week UK Published
-
Has the Taliban banned women from speaking?
Today's Big Question 'Rambling' message about 'bizarre' restriction joins series of recent decrees that amount to silencing of Afghanistan's women
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published