Politics of Mark Carney: SNP and Labour have cause to shudder
With his warning to the Scots and his comments on Labour's bank reforms, has the Governor gone too far?
IS MARK CARNEY, Governor of the Bank of England, getting too political? It's a question raised, not for the first time, after yesterday's intervention over sterling appeared to put the skids under Alex Salmond's Yes campaign for Scottish independence. Carney told an audience of business figures after meeting Salmond at Bute House that if Scotland wanted a durable, successful currency union with the Bank of England then it will require "some ceding of national sovereignty" by Scotland. The Scotsman today reports a Scottish Government spokesman accepting Carney's point that there would have to be a sharing of risk and fiscal stability across Scotland and what remained of the UK. "Any independent government looks at pooling sovereignty on a range of fronts," the spokesman told the paper. "This is done when it is in the country's interests to pool sovereignty, and rules and structures are put in place. We would still be responsible for our own taxation." Which raises the question: what is the point of Scottish independence and the Great Scottish Referendum later this year? As James Kirkup, political correspondent of the Daily Telegraph, put it in his ‘evening briefing' yesterday, Carney has "lobbed a hand grenade into the Scottish independence debate". Kirkup's colleague Ben Brogan added this morning: "Mr Carney delivered an unpalatable home truth to Mr Salmond: you can have independence, or the pound, but not both; and if Scotland were to join a currency union with Britain, it would have to hand over more fiscal powers than countries in the eurozone currently have to. "The intervention clearly represents a setback for Mr Salmond. As our leader points out, ‘Independence would not only leave the Scots in a materially precarious situation but, ironically, less free than before'." But the far more significant message that has emerged from Carney's intervention - at least for those south of the border who won't get a say in the referendum - is the extent to which he is prepared to engage in highly controversial political issues, and how that may read across to his relations with Ed Balls, Labour's shadow chancellor, and George Osborne, the Tory Chancellor who appointed him. As Kirkup put it yesterday, "Despite his eloquent protestations to the contrary, he [Carney] is turning out to be a rather political governor." Indeed, this is not the first time Carney has tip-toed into the political arena. Soon after arriving at the Bank from Canada last year, Carney and the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) issued forward advice to the City that serious consideration would be given to raising interest rates when unemployment fell to seven per cent. Last week unemployment fell to 7.1 per cent - threatening a rise in interest rates that could choke off all those home-buyers boosting the economy through mortgages and purchases of household goods to fill their new homes and, in one fell swoop, scupper Osborne's plans. But Carney immediately indicated that there was no immediate increase in interest rates in prospect. That got a big sigh of relief from the Treasury. But was it an economic decision, or a political one? And that's not all. When the news broke earlier this month that Ed Miliband wanted to impose a limit on the market share of individual banks, Carney was asked for his view by members of the Commons Treasury select committee. "Just breaking up an institution doesn't necessarily create or enable a more intensive competitive structure," the Carney responded. A cap on market share, he said, would "not result in substantial improvement to competition". As one of the BBC political team, Chris Mason, commented at the time, Carney also made it clear that he didn't favour Miliband's other big idea – a cap on banker's bonuses.
When shadow business secretary Chuka Umunna was asked later about Carney's remarks, he responded coolly: "I actually had an exchange in July 2010 with Mark Carney's predecessor, then Sir Mervyn King. He made it very clear to me that it is not a good thing for governors of the Bank of England to be involved in political matters."
Labour's shadow Treasury team will be watching like hawks to see if the Governor takes decisions in the run-up to the 2015 general election that can be construed as "political" to help Osborne win re-election for the Conservatives. Carney and his team might deny that anything so crude could possibly happen at the Bank of England, but don't underestimate the room for conflict between Chancellors and the Governor. We now know, thanks to Damian McBride's memoirs, that back in 2004 when Gordon Brown was Chancellor he issued a four-letter tirade against Mervyn King (albeit over the CIA spying on us rather than the economy). McBride recalls how Brown told King he was talking "f***ing bull****" when he said he had a duty to speak out and that it was his "f***ing ego dictating his position, not his duty to the country". You can expect Ed Balls to say something similar if there is any suggestion of Carney acting politically from his perch in Threadneedle Street.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Today's political cartoons - November 3, 2024
Cartoons Sunday's cartoons - presidential pitching, wavering convictions, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Why Man United finally lost patience with ten Hag
Talking Point After another loss United sacked ten Hag in hopes of success in the Champion's League
By The Week UK Published
-
Who are the markets backing in the US election?
Talking Point Speculators are piling in on the Trump trade. A Harris victory would come as a surprise
By The Week UK Published
-
What is the next Tory leader up against?
Today's Big Question Kemi Badenoch or Robert Jenrick will have to unify warring factions and win back disillusioned voters – without alienating the centre ground
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Alex Salmond: charismatic politician who nearly broke up the Union
In the Spotlight Remembering the former First Minister who 'normalised' the cause of Scottish independence
By The Week UK Published
-
What is Lammy hoping to achieve in China?
Today's Big Question Foreign secretary heads to Beijing as Labour seeks cooperation on global challenges and courts opportunities for trade and investment
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Britain about to 'boil over'?
Today's Big Question A message shared across far-right groups listed more than 30 potential targets for violence in the UK today
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
UK's Starmer slams 'far-right thuggery' at riots
Speed Read The anti-immigrant violence was spurred by false rumors that the suspect in the Southport knife attack was an immigrant
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The Tamils stranded on 'secretive' British island in Indian Ocean
Under the Radar Migrants 'unlawfully detained' since 2021 shipwreck on UK-controlled Diego Garcia, site of important US military base
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Britain's Labour Party wins in a landslide
Speed Read The Conservatives were unseated after 14 years of rule
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published