Three suggestions to solve the housing shortage
The MoD is sitting on redundant military bases ripe for house building
When the government announced its intention to simplify and relax the planning system, it knew it was courting trouble. Rural groups and the heritage lobby have been quick to claim that the countryside has been put up for grabs, to quote the National Trust, or at any rate that the proposals would mean more building in places where it is not welcome. The latter, at least, must be true – otherwise there would be no point in the proposals.
But the government's riposte that more homes are needed, and that the places where they are needed most are often those which resist them most fiercely, is also true. With the population booming and house building at its lowest level since the 1920's, this, too, could hardly be otherwise.
Last winter a similar outcry over selling off state-owned forests produced a rapid climbdown by the government. This time round, however, ministers sense that their critics are vulnerable – perhaps more than they realise - to the charge that they don't care about young people struggling to get on the housing ladder, or the need to get the economy growing again. But even if another U-turn looks unlikely, the problem is not just about where developers want to build; it is also about what they build, and especially how it looks. It is not only in the countryside that we do not like building. We don't much like it in towns or suburbs, and very often not in the cities either. Over the last few decades, we have got ourselves into a vicious circle whereby much modern development – and particularly housing – is so cramped, repetitive and unattractive that it reinforces the prejudice against itself.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Ironically, one of the main reasons for this is that the tight planning restrictions we rely on to protect the environment have driven the price of building land to such astronomical levels that not only are flats, houses and gardens all much smaller than they used to be, but too little money is left over for decent design, materials and finishes. Another unintended effect of the current system is that it is now so costly and difficult to get permission for new developments, that only the biggest house builders have the resources to manage it. The result is an industry dominated by half a dozen or so big players, who turn out the same depressingly uniform designs up and down the country.
The most effective way to improve the quality and variety of modern housing would be to reduce the dominance of the big developers, and – most important of all – to build at lower densities. The snag, of course, is that this would require releasing more land, which is precisely what the opponents of reform most fear. But there are things that could help square the circle.
First off, the government should reintroduce minimum space standards for new homes, on the lines of the old Parker Morris rules, as Boris Johnson is trying to do in London.
Second, the government should release more of its own land for house building. The MoD, in particular, is sitting on a multitude of semi-redundant military bases, many in the southern half of England where the pressure for new homes is most acute. Between them they account for tens of thousands of acres of brown field land, much of which could be used for low-density housing.
Third, the system should help more people to build their own homes, rather than having to rely on the big developers. In many countries it is normal to buy a serviced plot with planning permission, the utilities, roads etc already in place, and then commission a local firm to build a house to your own specification, but within overall guidelines governing size and appearance.
If councils were told to ensure there is enough serviced land in small plots to provide for at least ten per cent of all new homes, we could have something comparable in this country.
Of course it will take more than these suggestions to solve the housing shortage. But they would make a difference, not only to the number of homes that could be built but also to how people perceive them.
This problem has been festering since the 1980s, and for all that time, the countryside versus development debate has hardly moved one iota. Until both sides accept that resistance to development is as much about quality as quantity, it is hard to see how the impasse will ever be broken.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Last hopes for justice for UK's nuclear test veterans
Under the Radar Thousands of ex-service personnel say their lives have been blighted by aggressive cancers and genetic mutations
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Donald Trump wreck the Brexit deal?
Today's Big Question President-elect's victory could help UK's reset with the EU, but a free-trade agreement with the US to dodge his threatened tariffs could hinder it
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
What is the next Tory leader up against?
Today's Big Question Kemi Badenoch or Robert Jenrick will have to unify warring factions and win back disillusioned voters – without alienating the centre ground
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
What is Lammy hoping to achieve in China?
Today's Big Question Foreign secretary heads to Beijing as Labour seeks cooperation on global challenges and courts opportunities for trade and investment
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Trump blames migrants for the housing crisis. Experts aren't so sure.
Talking Points Migrants need housing. They also build it.
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
'Postwar Ukraine is going to be an intensely hostile neighbor'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
'We simply haven't built enough new housing'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
Will Kamala Harris give YIMBYs a voice in the White House?
Today's Big Question And can federal officials do anything about local housing rules?
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published