Is sex education under threat?
New sex education guidance a 'drastic over-reaction' say critics
![Illustration of a teacher showing young students anatomical diagrams, alongside a hand holding a condom](https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/VFt5gfzTLRYbRggMktKg35-415-80.jpg)
The government has claimed that children will be "protected" from "inappropriate teaching" on sex and relationships by new guidance announced today – but critics say they are alarmed by the rollback of sex education in England's schools.
The government has published new guidelines on Relationships, Sex and Health Education (RSHE) in schools in England following, it said, "multiple reports of disturbing materials" being used in sex education lessons in schools.
Under the guidelines, children will not be taught sex education before Year 5 – about nine years old – "and at that point from a purely scientific standpoint".
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
![https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg](https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516-320-80.jpg)
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
'Let children be children'
"Children must be allowed to be children", said Education Secretary Gillian Keegan writing in The Sun, announcing the new policy. While children need to be prepared for issues they will face in the future, "that doesn't mean they should be rushed into being adults or bombarded with concepts that they are not ready to grasp".
In the three and a half years since RSHE was made compulsory in schools "vocal groups have used it to push inappropriate and inaccurate teaching", said Keegan.
As well as introducing "age limits" for the first time, the guidelines "leave no room for doubt" that teachers should not teach about "the contested issue of gender identity", she said. "Never again will young girls be led to believe they might be happier if they were a boy, or children to think that there are 72 genders", she said.
A certain group of Conservative MPs have long pushed the idea that England's sex education is "age-inappropriate, extreme, sexualising and inaccurate", said Nimo Omer in The Guardian. Some 50 MPs urged Rishi Sunak last year to commission an independent inquiry into how sex education was being conducted in schools after evangelical Christian Conservative MP Miriam Cates claimed children were being presented with "graphic" material including "lessons on oral sex" and "how to choke your partner safely".
But most teachers "do not recognise" this characterisation of sex education; most say schools are "exceedingly cautious" about what they teach. Nevertheless, the "crusade against sex education" appears to have "won out" with the government announcing an overhaul of guidance.
'War on woke'
It's hard to view this policy as anything other than part of the Tories' "war on woke" said Liz Toner in The Independent. Since parents can already opt their children out of sex education this new guidance seems firmly aimed at "the self-proclaimed anti-'woke' brigade, who believe that kids are filtering into school aged five, handed a rainbow flag and told they're any gender they want". For Sunak, this is not "a true issue of concern or conscience" but about avoiding "a trouncing at the polls".
As an "old-fashioned common sense type" I have a "horrid suspicion" I may be the kind of parent the government is trying to appeal to, said Jemima Lewis in The Telegraph. But the new guidance is "both a drastic over-reaction, and a cowardly fudge" which seeks to "mollify two quite different cohorts of concerned parents: the middle-aged liberals like me who think sex is tremendous but the whole gender thing has gone a bit far; and the religiously devout, who don't want their children exposed to any of this filth".
"Both cohorts are somewhat deluded", as "like it or not, our children will pick up most of their sex 'education' from the internet'", said Lewis. But if the government really is concerned about "unscientific gender notions being reinforced in schools" then it should address that issue separately. "Lumping gender in with sex – quite apart from being a category error – is politically short-sighted" and risks "destroying a good, and increasingly necessary, part of the education system in order to pacify two completely different groups of anxious parents, neither of whom are likely to be satisfied".
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Sorcha Bradley is a writer at The Week and a regular on “The Week Unwrapped” podcast. She worked at The Week magazine for a year and a half before taking up her current role with the digital team, where she mostly covers UK current affairs and politics. Before joining The Week, Sorcha worked at slow-news start-up Tortoise Media. She has also written for Sky News, The Sunday Times, the London Evening Standard and Grazia magazine, among other publications. She has a master’s in newspaper journalism from City, University of London, where she specialised in political journalism.
-
Today's political cartoons - September 7, 2024
Cartoons Saturday's cartoons - football widows, meddling kids, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Smoking ban: the return of the nanny state?
Talking Point Starmer's plan to revive Sunak-era war on tobacco has struck an unsettling chord even with some non-smokers
By The Week UK Published
-
Crossword: September 7, 2024
The Week's daily crossword puzzle
By The Week Staff Published
-
On Leadership: why Tony Blair's new book has divided critics
Talking Point The former Labour leader has created a 'practical guide to good governance' but should Keir Starmer take note?
By Ellie O'Mahoney, The Week UK Published
-
'Year-round school is also good for kids'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
Is Britain about to 'boil over'?
Today's Big Question A message shared across far-right groups listed more than 30 potential targets for violence in the UK today
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
UK's Starmer slams 'far-right thuggery' at riots
Speed Read The anti-immigrant violence was spurred by false rumors that the suspect in the Southport knife attack was an immigrant
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Why did the Secret Service fail to protect Trump?
Talking Point Secret Service under pressure to explain operational failures – and it's not the first time they’ve slipped up
By The Week UK Published
-
Iran: does Masoud Pezeshkian's election mark a turning point?
Talking Point New president is seen as a progressive but much will depend on how the US reacts
By The Week UK Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The Tamils stranded on 'secretive' British island in Indian Ocean
Under the Radar Migrants 'unlawfully detained' since 2021 shipwreck on UK-controlled Diego Garcia, site of important US military base
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published